On January 8, the State of Illinois petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for a rehearing before the full court in the NRA-backed case Shepard v. Madigan. A month earlier, on December 11, a three-judge Seventh Circuit panel struck down Illinois' complete ban on Right-to-Carry outside the home.
Writing the initial decision was Judge Richard Posner, who made clear that in light of the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago, Illinois' ban was unconstitutional and that "To confine the right to be armed to the home is to divorce the Second Amendment from the right to self-defense described in Heller and McDonald." The panel ruled that Illinois had 180 days to enact a suitable Right-to-Carry law, and the filing of the petition doesn't stop the clock on that deadline.
In the petition for rehearing, Illinois claims that the Shepard decision contradicts two other federal appeals court decisions, Kachalsky v. County of Westchester in the Second Circuit and United States v. Masciandaro in the Fourth Circuit, both of which interpreted the right to self-defense in Heller more narrowly, upholding restrictions on carrying firearms outside the home. Illinois also took issue with the panel's holding that the state failed to show empirical evidence that the carry ban "was vital to public safety."
Joining Illinois was the Brady Center, which filed a "friend of the court" brief supporting the state. In line with the group's anti-self-defense mission, the brief assailed Judge Posner's decision as "broad and unmeasured." The brief goes on to argue against an interpretation of the Second Amendment that would include self-defense outside the home, and asks the court to consider empirical public safety data in its analysis of the law's legitimacy. Presumably that means Brady-approved firearm studies.
NRA-ILA will continue to litigate this case aggressively in order to bring Illinois into line with the 49 states that have some legal mechanism for exercising the right to carry outside the home.
Illinois Seeks Review of Right-to-Carry Case

Friday, January 11, 2013
Thursday, May 22, 2025
Earlier today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R.1 the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which included Section 2 of the Hearing Protection Act, completely removing suppressors from the National Firearms Act (NFA).
Thursday, May 22, 2025
"This morning, the U.S. House of Representatives passed President Trump's One, Big, Beautiful Bill, which includes the complete removal of suppressors from the National Firearms Act (NFA). This represents a monumental victory for Second Amendment ...
Monday, May 19, 2025
The U.S. House of Representatives has another chance to amend the current Reconciliation Bill making its way through Congress. The Reconciliation Bill would currently rescind the unconstitutional tax on suppressors, but it doesn’t remove them ...
Monday, May 19, 2025
On Friday, May 16, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the settlement of several lawsuits arising from the Biden-Harris regime’s attempt to reclassify forced reset triggers (FRTs) as “machineguns.” DOJ’s announcement cited President Trump’s Executive Order Protecting ...
Monday, May 5, 2025
On April 30, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) introduced the so-called “Assault Weapons Ban of 2025.” Picking up where his predecessor Dianne Feinstein left off, Schiff’s legislation would ban commonly-owned semi-automatic firearms, such as the AR-15.
More Like This From Around The NRA
