Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Rolling the Dice on New Jersey’s Voluntary Surrender Law

Monday, November 2, 2020

Rolling the Dice on New Jersey’s Voluntary Surrender Law

New Jersey is one of only eight states that continue to ban the possession of firearm silencers or suppressors (these remain regulated under federal law, which defines suppressors as “firearms” under the Gun Control Act and National Firearms Act).

New Jersey law defines “prohibited weapons and devices” to include “firearm silencers,” and any person who knowingly has one in his or her possession is guilty of a crime. A separate law, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-12, directs that “[n]o person shall be convicted of an offense” based on their unlawful possession of a silencer if, before any law enforcement investigation is commenced or charges are brought, the silencer is voluntarily surrendered to the local police chief or state police superintendent. The section advises that it does not grant “immunity from prosecution for any crime or offense except” for the unlawful possession of the devices surrendered.

According to news reports, New Jersey resident Matthew Moran placed two orders for automotive “fuel filters” in response to an ad on Instagram. After the first package of two arrived, Moran thought they looked like silencers and took them to a friend at an auto parts shop. He was told the items were not fuel filters and that he should dispose of them.

As allowed by the state law, Moran voluntarily surrendered the first shipment to his local police department and told the detective that the second shipment, which had yet to arrive, was being cancelled.  He “notified the China-based Instagram vendor, PayPal, and his bank to cancel the second order and payment,” and alerted the U.S. Postal Service that he was refusing delivery of any shipment from that vendor. When the second order was delivered to his home despite his instructions and precautions, Moran “immediately” transported it to the police to voluntarily surrender the package. He was arrested on his way into the building.

In a press release regarding the arrest and charges, Bergen County Prosecutor Mark Musella   announced that “an international arms-trafficking investigation” had identified Moran as a “person of interest” because “illegal silencers were purchased by [him] from a company based in China and smuggled though the mail to his residence.” A search warrant executed at Moran’s home resulted in the seizure of firearms, magazines, ammunition and ballistic vests, none of which appear to have resulted in charges. The only charges listed are four counts of possession of a silencer in violation of state law.

New Jersey law defines a “firearm silencer” as any instrument or appliance “for causing the firing of any gun, revolver, pistol or other firearm to be silent, or intended to lessen or muffle the noise of the firing” of any firearm, but it isn’t clear whether the devices delivered to Moran are actually silencers or even operable as such. In addition, if Moran’s shipments of two items each are the only ones involved, the charges appear to include the first set that was voluntarily surrendered and presumably covered by the statutory immunity from prosecution.

Ads for these kinds of “fuel filters” are ubiquitous. Well-meaning citizens could assume that this widespread availability means the devices are lawful or have been cleared for sale. In the case of an honest mistake, such individuals may believe they can rely on the immunity that New Jersey holds out as an inducement to come forward and surrender items that are of questionable legality.

Moran’s case suggests that the process is much more of a gamble.

Moran’s attorney, Evan Nappen, summarizes the situation by describing his client, a licensed gun owner with no prior criminal convictions, as one who initiated the contact with law enforcement, voluntarily surrendered the initial order, was forthright and truthful about the second shipment, and did everything he could to cancel the outstanding order and stop delivery. Regardless, Moran was arrested, his home was searched and his property seized, and he has been labeled as an international arms trafficker. The case, of course, remains pending and the claims against Moran are simply allegations.         

IN THIS ARTICLE
New Jersey Gun Confiscation
TRENDING NOW
FBI Releases Final Crime Report for 2025 to the Dismay of Firearm Prohibitionists

News  

Monday, August 24, 2026

FBI Releases Final Crime Report for 2025 to the Dismay of Firearm Prohibitionists

There has been a certain amount of anticipation while the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) analyzed the available crime data for last year. The speculation among many was that the report would be, not just ...

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

News  

Monday, August 17, 2026

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

On August 12, we reported on an important development in the ongoing litigation over the National Firearms Act (NFA) filed by multiple plaintiffs in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. These included, ...

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

In another major victory for the National Rifle Association and law-abiding gun owners, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas today held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for ...

All Flags, No Fix: Michigan’s Real Public Safety Problem

News  

Monday, August 31, 2026

All Flags, No Fix: Michigan’s Real Public Safety Problem

Sorry, Michiganders, but the state has developed a serious problem with crime and consequences.

District Court Enters Final Judgment Striking Down New Mexico’s Waiting Period Law in NRA Victory

Friday, August 28, 2026

District Court Enters Final Judgment Striking Down New Mexico’s Waiting Period Law in NRA Victory

The U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico granted summary judgment holding New Mexico’s 7-day waiting period law unconstitutional in Ortega v. Grisham—a case brought by the National Rifle Association and Mountain States ...

DOJ Relaunches Federal Firearms Rights Restoration with New Final Rule

News  

Monday, August 24, 2026

DOJ Relaunches Federal Firearms Rights Restoration with New Final Rule

On August 20, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) published a final rule in the Federal Register that establishes application standards for those seeking relief from federal firearm disabilities under the Gun Control Act of ...

What Does the Texas NFA Decision Mean for You?

News  

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

What Does the Texas NFA Decision Mean for You?

On August 5, 2026, Judge Wesley Hendrix of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns ...

Biden-Era “Engaged in the Business” Rule (Again) Ruled Illegal

News  

Monday, August 31, 2026

Biden-Era “Engaged in the Business” Rule (Again) Ruled Illegal

The anti-gun programs and policies of the Biden-Harris administration have been falling like dominoes, lately.

California: Anti-Gun Bills Pass the Legislature, Now Heading to the Governor's Desk

Wednesday, August 26, 2026

California: Anti-Gun Bills Pass the Legislature, Now Heading to the Governor's Desk

This week, three anti-gun bills received final passage from the legislature and will now be transmitted to the Governor's desk for his consideration. The most egregious among these measures is Senate Bill 948, which imposes ...

SCOTUS Statutory Ruling Not the Final Word on Biden-Era “Frame or Receiver” Rule

News  

Monday, August 24, 2026

SCOTUS Statutory Ruling Not the Final Word on Biden-Era “Frame or Receiver” Rule

For years, NRA-ILA has closely followed and reported on the legal and regulatory saga surrounding the Biden-Harris administration’s so-called “Frame or Receiver” rule. 

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.