Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Twenty-four State Attorneys General Urge Congress to Pass H.R. 38

Monday, June 2, 2025

Twenty-four State Attorneys General Urge Congress to Pass H.R. 38

On May 21, two dozen state attorneys general sent a letter to the leadership of the U.S. House of Representatives, urging that body to pass H.R. 38, the Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act.

The effort, led by Gentner Drummond of Oklahoma and John B. McCuskey of West Virginia, is the largest show of law enforcement support for H.R. 38 in this Congress. It reflects the “perspective [of] the chief law officers of … states … which either recognize the right of law-abiding citizens to carry concealed handguns without a permit or grant full recognition to concealed carry credentials issued by other states.” That experience led the signatories to state: “we know firsthand that recognizing a broad right of concealed carry among law-abiding Americans promotes public safety and respects the fundamental liberties of our constituents.”

Responding to news reports and other critics of the legislation, the letter debunked various fallacies about what the bill would do and whom it would benefit.

It first noted the bill only protects those who are federally eligible to possess firearms, which excludes individuals with a serious criminal history, those subject to certain restraining orders, and persons illegally present in the U.S. Also excluded would be those with dangerous mental health conditions, as established by court commitments or adjudications.

The letter also pushed back against the idea the bill would be an infringement of “states rights,” noting nothing would change about the laws of the states themselves and outlining how state laws and property rights would remain broadly enforceable. It also hinted that these objections were not necessarily offered sincerely or in good faith, observing that such concerns “would have been completely unfamiliar, if not repugnant, to some of these same pundits in any other context.”

The missive further asserted that concerns about the ability of police to keep the peace were obviously overblown, “as permitless carry is now the majority rule in the United States, and police departments … continue to protect and serve the public as before.” It emphasized the continued “authority of a police officer encountering an individual with a concealed firearm to conduct an appropriate investigative stop, consistent with Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), to determine the lawfulness of the behavior and whether the person meets the thresholds for protection under the Act.”

Finally, the letter took on the false premise that the legislation would “force states with strict permitting standards to accommodate carriers from jurisdictions with more lax requirements.” It argued anti-gun states made this claim not because their permitting standards were better at screening out high-risk applicants, but simply because they prevented as many people from carrying as possible. “But failure to acknowledge the right is not the same thing as permitting only the ‘safest’ people to carry,” the AGs noted.

The letter concluded:

our constituents are threatened with arrest, prosecution, and mandatory prison time for technical violations of licensing or possession laws involving conduct that is perfectly legal in all but a handful of states, most of which have well-established history and practice of suppressing the right to keep and bear arms. This is unacceptable, and Congress has the authority and the duty to protect these rights.

While suppressors have lately been in the spotlight because of Congress moving legislation to remove them from the NFA, the NRA remains committed to achieving the goal of interstate reciprocity for concealed carry. The AGs’ letter represents an important milestone illustrating the broad support and success concealed carry has achieved in the states. Hopefully Congress is paying attention and will finally catch up to the states in recognizing this fundamental aspect of Second Amendment rights and, indeed, of the American experience.  

In the meantime, the NRA thanks Attorneys General Drummond and McCuskey as well as the rest of the signatories for their leadership in this important effort. 

TRENDING NOW
FBI Releases Final Crime Report for 2025 to the Dismay of Firearm Prohibitionists

News  

Monday, August 24, 2026

FBI Releases Final Crime Report for 2025 to the Dismay of Firearm Prohibitionists

There has been a certain amount of anticipation while the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) analyzed the available crime data for last year. The speculation among many was that the report would be, not just ...

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

News  

Monday, August 17, 2026

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

On August 12, we reported on an important development in the ongoing litigation over the National Firearms Act (NFA) filed by multiple plaintiffs in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. These included, ...

DOJ Relaunches Federal Firearms Rights Restoration with New Final Rule

News  

Monday, August 24, 2026

DOJ Relaunches Federal Firearms Rights Restoration with New Final Rule

On August 20, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) published a final rule in the Federal Register that establishes application standards for those seeking relief from federal firearm disabilities under the Gun Control Act of ...

SCOTUS Statutory Ruling Not the Final Word on Biden-Era “Frame or Receiver” Rule

News  

Monday, August 24, 2026

SCOTUS Statutory Ruling Not the Final Word on Biden-Era “Frame or Receiver” Rule

For years, NRA-ILA has closely followed and reported on the legal and regulatory saga surrounding the Biden-Harris administration’s so-called “Frame or Receiver” rule. 

District Court Enters Final Judgment Striking Down New Mexico’s Waiting Period Law in NRA Victory

Friday, August 28, 2026

District Court Enters Final Judgment Striking Down New Mexico’s Waiting Period Law in NRA Victory

The U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico granted summary judgment holding New Mexico’s 7-day waiting period law unconstitutional in Ortega v. Grisham—a case brought by the National Rifle Association and Mountain States ...

California: Anti-Gun Bills Pass the Legislature, Now Heading to the Governor's Desk

Wednesday, August 26, 2026

California: Anti-Gun Bills Pass the Legislature, Now Heading to the Governor's Desk

This week, three anti-gun bills received final passage from the legislature and will now be transmitted to the Governor's desk for his consideration. The most egregious among these measures is Senate Bill 948, which imposes ...

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

In another major victory for the National Rifle Association and law-abiding gun owners, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas today held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for ...

What Does the Texas NFA Decision Mean for You?

News  

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

What Does the Texas NFA Decision Mean for You?

On August 5, 2026, Judge Wesley Hendrix of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns ...

NRA Files Another Lawsuit Challenging the National Firearms Act

Thursday, October 9, 2025

NRA Files Another Lawsuit Challenging the National Firearms Act

Today, the National Rifle Association—along with the American Suppressor Association, Firearms Policy Coalition, and Second Amendment Foundation—announced the filing of another lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA).

ATF Director Corrects Gun Control Advocates on Regulatory Reform

News  

Monday, August 17, 2026

ATF Director Corrects Gun Control Advocates on Regulatory Reform

In a stark departure from the last administration, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is taking gun control advocates to task for their sensationalist rhetoric and questionable legal claims. 

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.