Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

NRA`s Friend Of The Court Brief In U.S. V. Emerson

Tuesday, February 15, 2000

__________________

No. 99-10331
__________________

IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

TIMOTHY JOE EMERSON
Defendant-Appellee
__________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Texas, San Angelo Division
__________________

BRIEF SUPPORTING APPELLEE OF AMICUS CURIAE
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
__________________

Of Counsel:
Professor Nicholas J. Johnson
140 W. 62nd Street, Room 226
New York, N.Y. 10023
(212) 636-6983

Robert Dowlut
11250 Waples Mill Rd. 6N (NRA)
Fairfax, VA 22030-7400
(703) 267-1254
Fax (703) 267-3985
Counsel for Amicus Curiae



IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Appeal Numbers 99-10331

Plaintiff-Appellant


v.

) Appeal from U.S. District Court, Northern
) District of Texas
) San Angelo Division
) Criminal No. 6:98CR103C
) Honorable Sam R. Cummings

Defendant-Appellee
TIMOTHY JOE EMERSON,

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS

The undersigned counsel of record for amicus curiae National Rifle Association of America (NRA) certifies that the following listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the judges of this Court may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal.

Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross Appellee:

United States of America

Represented by:

William Bryan Mateja
U. S. Attorney`s Office
1205 Texas Avenue, 7th Floor
Lubbock, Texas 79401

Defendant-Appellee-Cross Appellant:

Timothy Joe Emerson

Represented by:

Timothy Crooks
Federal Public Defender
600 Texas Street, Suite 100
Fort Worth, Texas 76102-4612

Amicus Curiae:
National Rifle Association of America is a New York not-for-profit corporation. It has not issued stock or debt securities to the public. It is recognized by the Internal Revenue Service as a 26 U.S.C. Sec. 501(c)(4) entity.

Represented by:

Robert Dowlut
11250 Waples Mill Rd., 6N (NRA)
Fairfax, Virginia 22030-7400
Attorney for Amicus Curiae

Respectfully submitted,

________________________________
Robert Dowlut
Attorney for Amicus Curiae NRA

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Certificate of Interested Persons

Table of Authorities

Statement of Interest and Identity of Amicus Curiae National Rifle Association of America

Summary of Argument

Argument

I. The Second Amendment protects the fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms

A. The text and history of the Second Amendment are consistent and unambiguous

B. The right to keep and bear arms continues to serve its constitutional purpose in contemporary America

II. Supreme Court precedent does not support the constitutionality of the government`s attempted application of section 922(g)(8)

A. The Miller decision

B. Miller accepted the individual right interpretation of the Second Amendment

C. Miller`s holding applies only to weapons peculiarly adapted to criminal purposes

III. The Fifth Circuit precedents cited by the government do not address the issue in this case

IV. Precedent from other circuits provide no persuasive reason to accept the government`s attempted application of Sec. 922(g)(8)

A. The "states` right" theory should not be adopted by this Court

B. This Court should not adopt an interpretation of Miller that renders the Second Amendment a dead letter

Conclusion

Certificate of Service

Certificate of Compliance

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Cases

Aymette v. State, 21 Tenn. (2 Hum.) 154 (1840)
Cases v. United States, 131 F.2d 916 (1st Cir. 1942), cert. denied, 319 U.S. 770 (1943)

DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989)

Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968)
Gillespie v. City of Indianapolis, 185 F.3d 693 (7th Cir. 1999)
Hickman v. Block, 81 F.3d 98 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 912 (1996)
Lewis v. United States, 445 U.S. 55 (1980)
Love v. Pepersack, 47 F.3d 120 (4th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 813 (1995)
Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252 (1886)
Quilici v. Village of Morton Grove, 695 F.2d 261 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 863 (1983)

Saenz v. Heldenfels Brothers, Inc., 183 F.3d 389 (5th Cir. 1999)
United States v. Bass, 404 U.S. 336 (1971)
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)

v

United States v. Friel, 1 F.3d 1231 (1st Cir. 1993)
United States v. Hale, 978 F.2d 1016 (8th Cir. 1992) cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 (1993)
United States v. Johnson
, 497 F.2d 548 (4th Cir. 1974)
United States v. Johnson, 441 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939)
United States v. Oakes, 564 F.2d 384 (10th Cir. 1977) cert. denied, 435 U.S. 926 (1978)

United States v. Rybar, 103 F.3d 273 (3d Cir. 1996) cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 46 (1997)
United States v. Stevens, 440 F.2d 144 (6th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Toner, 728 F.2d 115 (2d Cir. 1984)
United States v. Tot, 131 F.2d 261 (3rd Cir. 1942), rev`d on other grounds, 319 U.S. 463 (1943)

United States v. Warin, 530 F.2d 103 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied 426 U.S. 948 (1976)

United States v. Williams, 446 F.2d 486 (5th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Wright, 117 F.3d 1265 (11th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 584 (1997)

Constitutional and Statutory Provisions

10 U.S.C. Sec. 311

18 U.S.C. Sec. 922(g)(8)

Act of May 8, 1792, ch. 33, 1 Stat. 271

Articles of Confederation art. VI, para. 4

U.S. Const. art. I, Sec. 8, cl. 16

Other Authorities

William Blackstone, Commentaries (St. George Tucker ed. 1803)

Thomas M. Cooley, The General Principles of Constitutional Law in the United States of America (2d ed. 1891)

3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45 (2d ed. 1836)

3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 425 (3d ed. 1937)

Robert J. Cottrol & Raymond T. Diamond, The Second Amendment: Toward an Afro-Americanist Reconsideration, 80 Georgetown L.J. 309 (1991)

2 Max Farrand, The Records of the Federal Convention (1911)

The Federalist (C. Rossiter ed., 1961)

Don B. Kates, The Second Amendment and the Ideology of Self-Protection, 9 Const. Commentary 87 (1992)

Gary Kleck, Targeting Guns: Firearms and their Control (Aldine de Gruyter 1997)

Gary Kleck & Marc Gertz, Ar

TRENDING NOW
Trump’s DOJ Will Participate in Oral Arguments in Illinois Semi-Auto Ban Case

News  

Monday, September 15, 2025

Trump’s DOJ Will Participate in Oral Arguments in Illinois Semi-Auto Ban Case

Within six months of the landmark United States Supreme Court decision of NYSRPA v. Bruen (2022), Illinois disregarded the Court’s clear directives and enacted into law H.B. 5741, the Protect Illinois Communities Act (PICA). 

Armed Citizens: Not Just an American Concept

News  

Monday, September 15, 2025

Armed Citizens: Not Just an American Concept

We frequently post stories about law-abiding citizens who, by exercising their rights protected under the Second Amendment, bring an end to violent criminal assaults.  

New York Law Imperils U.S. Olympic Target Shooting, Favors China’s Dominance

News  

Monday, September 15, 2025

New York Law Imperils U.S. Olympic Target Shooting, Favors China’s Dominance

As U.S. shooting sports athletes prepare for the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles, New York law is burdening target shooters in the Empire State.

Third Circuit Strikes Some New Jersey Carry Restrictions in NRA Case

Thursday, September 11, 2025

Third Circuit Strikes Some New Jersey Carry Restrictions in NRA Case

Yesterday, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Siegel v. Platkin, striking some of the carry restrictions New Jersey enacted in response to the NRA’s landmark Supreme Court victory, New York State Rifle & ...

“Sensitive Places” Embolden Criminals and Threaten the Law-abiding

News  

Monday, September 15, 2025

“Sensitive Places” Embolden Criminals and Threaten the Law-abiding

A beyond horrific murder flashed before our eyes in recent weeks, and a nation collectively mourned Iryna Zarutska after the sickening attack that took her life on a public train in Charlotte, North Carolina

California: Legislature Adjourns with Anti-Gun Bills Headed to the Governor's Desk

Monday, September 15, 2025

California: Legislature Adjourns with Anti-Gun Bills Headed to the Governor's Desk

On Friday the California State Legislature adjourned the 2025 legislative session in typical California fashion, advancing anti-gun legislation to Governor Newsom's desk. Contact Governor Newsome today and urge his veto of AB 1078, AB 1127, AB ...

Gun Control “Journalist” Says the Quiet Part Out Loud

News  

Monday, September 8, 2025

Gun Control “Journalist” Says the Quiet Part Out Loud

Pure gun control. As in disarmament and banning of firearms. It’s rare that anti-gunners get straight to the exact point that we have been warning of for decades. 

Colorado: CSSA Files Suit Challenging "Polis Permission Slip" Permit-to-Purchase Law

Tuesday, September 9, 2025

Colorado: CSSA Files Suit Challenging "Polis Permission Slip" Permit-to-Purchase Law

Last week, the Colorado State Shooting Association (CSSA), the official state affiliate of NRA, filed a lawsuit challenging Senate Bill 25-003...

Minnesota: Senate Gun Violence Prevention Working Group Meeting on Monday

Friday, September 12, 2025

Minnesota: Senate Gun Violence Prevention Working Group Meeting on Monday

On Monday, September 15th, the Minnesota Senate will hold a special working group on "gun violence prevention."

Florida: Miami Beach City Commission Considering Anti-Gun Resolution Tomorrow

Tuesday, September 16, 2025

Florida: Miami Beach City Commission Considering Anti-Gun Resolution Tomorrow

Tomorrow, September 17, at 8:30 a.m., the Miami Beach City Commission will hold a public meeting to consider an anti-gun resolution. The resolution, proposed by Commissioner Alex Fernandez, directs the Office of the City Attorney ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.