Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

test2222

Friday, November 15, 2002

PLAINTIFFS DATE, Court, CASE # DEFENDANTS ALLEGED CLAIMS LAWSUIT PREEMPTION? CASE STATUS Q = CASE CLOSED
New Orleans, LA 10/30/98Louisiana Supreme Court 2000-CA-1132 15 manufacturers and distributors, 5 dealers, 3 associations Defective design, negligent distribution YES - passed 4/99 State Supreme Court reversed lower court decision 4/3/01 and DISMISSED all claims. U.S. Supreme Court DENIED CERT. on 10/9/01. q
Chicago and Cook County, IL 11/12/98 amended 4/7/99 IL App. Ct. 1st Jud. Dist.00-3541 22 manufacturers and distributors, 12 dealers Negligent distribution,defective design, nuisance NO CONSOLIDATED & DISMISSED by trial court. Appealed to Illinois 1st Dist. App. court. Argument heard 12/2001. Public nuisance claim allowed to proceed 11/4/02. IL Sup. Ct. granted appeal on 4/8/03.
State of Illinois 11/14/00 Cir. Ct. Cook County 00-CH-016394 4 manufacturers and 8 distributors Public nuisance NO Motion to dismiss filed on 1/29/01. Argument 1/10/02. DISMISSED.
Miami-Dade County, FL 1/27/99FL Supreme Ct.SC-01861 26 manufacturers and distributors, 3 associations, 2 dealers Defective design, deceptive advertising, negligent distribution YES -- SB 412 signed by Gov. Bush 5/1/01 DISMISSED at trial 12/13/99, DISMISSED at Appellate Court 2/14/01, appealed to State Supreme Court. Grant of cert. denied 10/24/01. q
Bridgeport, CT 1/27/99 amended 4/22/99CT Supreme CourtSC-16465 21 manufacturers and distributors, 12 dealers, 3 associations Negligent distribution, defective design, deceptive advertising, nuisance, conspiracy, unjust enrichment NO DISMISSED at trial 12/10/99, appealed 12/29/99, transferred to CT Supreme Court. Trial Court AFFIRMED on 10/9/01 q
Atlanta, GA 2/5/99Court of Appeals, GAA01A2521 14 manufacturers and distributors, 3 associations Defective and negligent design, conspiracy, negligent distribution YES - passed 2/99 DISMISSED 2/13/02 by Court of Appeals citing lawsuit preemption statute. No appeal to GA Sup. Court filed. q
Cleveland, OH 4/8/99US Dist. Ct. N. Dist. Of OH1:99-CK-1134 17 manufacturers and distributors, 3 associations Defective design, nuisance, unjust enrichment YES - HB 192 signed by Gov. 7/6/01. Motion to dismiss DENIED 3/14/00. No action taken since stay lifted 6/2002.
Detroit, MI(consolidated with Wayne County) 4/26/99MI Ct. of Appeals 24 manufacturers and distributors, 11 dealers Negligent distribution, nuisance YES - passed 6/2000 - On 3/30/01 court ruled the retroactive application of the statute was unconstitutional DISMISSED negligence claim, DENIED public nuisance claim DENIED lawsuit preemption statute claim 3/23/01. Defendants appealed. Argument heard 11/19/02.
Wayne County, MI(consolidated with Detroit) 4/26/99MI Ct. of Appeals 24 manufacturers and distributors, 11 dealers Negligent distribution, nuisance YES - passed 6/2000 - On 3/30/01 court ruled the retroactive application of the statute was unconstitutional DISMISSED negligence claim, DENIED public nuisance claim DENIED lawsuit preemption statute claim 3/23/01. Defendants appealed. Argument heard 11/19/02.
Cincinnati, OH 4/28/99Supreme Ct., OH00-1705 16 manufacturers and distributors, 3 associations Negligent distribution, defective design, deceptive advertising, nuisance YES - HB 192 signed by Gov. 7/6/01. DISMISSED, at trial, AFFIRMED by Court of Appeals. A split OH Sup. Ct. reinstated case 6/12/02. Back in trial court. Trade Assoc.`s dismissed from suit on 11/15/02. City dropped suit on 4/30/03. q
St. Louis, MO 4/30/99City of St. Louis Circuit Ct.992-01209 25 manufacturers and distributors, 2 dealers, 3 associations Negligent distribution, defective design, deceptive advertising, nuisance, conspiracy, unjust enrichment YES - SB 1 passed in 1999. Motion to dismiss was filed 10/5/00. Argument on motion to dismiss heard on 1/24/03.
CITIES OF NORTH CA Oakland, Berkeley, Sacramento, East Palo Alto, San Francisco, Alameda County, San Mateo County 5/25/99Case coordinated with cities below.Superior Court, San Diego.JCCP # 4095 28 manufacturers, 6 distributors and dealers, 3 associations Negligent distribution, nuisance, defective design, deceptive advertising, fraudulent business practices NO -- Product liability protection at CA. CIV. CODE § 1714.4 was repealed 9/25/02 Motion to dismiss DENIED 9/15/00. Manu. filed motion to preclude evidence on 6/28/02. Defendants filed motion for summary judgment 1/3/03 following close of discovery. DISMISSED in part on 3/7/03. Appeal has been filed.
CITIES OF SOUTH CA Los Angeles, Compton, West Hollywood, Inglewood 5/25/99Case coordinated with cities above.Superior Court, San Diego.JCCP # 4095 39 manufacturers, 5 distributors, 5 dealers, 3 associations Negligent distribution, nuisance, defective design, deceptive advertising, fraudulent business practices NO -- Product liability protection at CA. CIV. CODE § 1714.4 was repealed 9/25/02 Motion to dismiss DENIED 9/15/00. Manu. filed motion to preclude evidence on 6/28/02. Defendants filed motion for summary judgment 1/3/03 following close of discovery. DISMISSED in part on 3/7/03. Appeal has been filed
County of Los Angeles,CA 8/6/99Casecoordinatedwith cities above.JCCP # 4095 28 manufacturers, 6 distributors and dealers, 3 associations Negligent distribution, nuisance, defective design, deceptive advertising, fraudulent business practices NO -- Product liability protection at CA. CIV. CODE § 1714.4 was repealed 9/25/02 Motion to dismiss DENIED 9/15/00. Defendants filed motion to preclude evidence on 6/28/02. Defendants filed motion for summary judgment 1/3/03 following close of discovery. DISMISSED in part on 3/7/03. Appeal has been filed
Camden Co., NJ 6/2/1999 US Dist. Ct, Dist. Of New Jersey99-CV-2518 22 manufacturers Negligent distribution, defective design, assault and/or battery, economic interference NO U.S. District Ct. DISMISSED 12/5/00, appealed to U.S. 3rd Cir. Ct. App. 1/3/01. Argument heard 9/4/01. DISMISSED 11/16/01. No appeal to U.S. Sup. Court. q
Boston, MA 6/3/99Superior Court, Suffolk County99-2590 29 manufacturers and distributors, 3 associations Negligent distribution, defective design, deceptive advertising, nuisance, unjust enrichment NO Motion to dismiss DENIED 7/13/00, interlocutory appeal denied 9/19/00, the 3 trade associations filed a separate motion dismiss for lack of jurisdiction - DENIED 11/20/00. Discovery completed 1/19/02. Trial was scheduled to begin 9/24/02. The city dropped its suit 3/27/02. q
City of Newark, NJ 6/9/99Superior Ct. of NJ, Essex CountyESX-L-6059-99 28 manufacturers, 2 distributors, 2 associations Negligent distribution, defective design, deceptive advertising, nuisance, unjust enrichment NO DISMISSED products liability & unjust enrichment claims but DENIED dismissal of negligent marketing & distribution claim 12/11/01. Appealed. On 3/11/03 AFFIRMED but trade groups were dismissed.
City of Camden, NJ 6/21/99Superior Ct. of NJ, Camden CountyCAM-4510-99 19 manufacturers and 3 associations Negligent distribution, defective design, deceptive advertising, nuisance, unjust enrichment NO Oral argument on a motion to dismiss heard 2/22/01. DISMISSED 7/7/03.
City of Gary, IN 8/27/99Lake Superior Ct.45-D05-0005-CT-243 21 manufacturers & distributors, 3 assoc., 5 dealers Negligent distribution & marketing, negligence, nuisance YESEffective 4/18/2001 DISMISSED 1/23/01. 1st amended complaint DISMISSED 3/13/01. Appealed on 4/13/01. On 9/20/02 App. Ct. upheld dismissal of all but 3 dealer defendants. Indiana Sup. Ct. heard appeal 2/27/03.
City of Wilmington, DE 9/29/99Del. Superior Ct., New Castle County99-C-09-283 12 manufacturers, 3 associations Negligent distribution, marketing, design, inadequate warnings, nuisance, fraud, unjust enrichment, civil conspiracy NO DISMISSED by Superior Court. A decision to not file an appeal was made on 12/26/02. q
Wash., D.C. 1/20/00DC Superior Ct., Civ. Div.00-000428 25 manufacturers and 4 distributors Negligent distribution, strict liability, public nuisance NO Oral argument on motion to dismiss heard 4/13/01. 12/16/02 case DISMISSED. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal.
City of Philadelphia 4/11/00Ct. of Common Pleas, Phila. County00-1442 14 manufacturers and distributors Negligent distribution, public nuisance YES - passed 12/99 U.S. Dist. Ct. DISMISSED 12/20/00, appealed to U.S. 3rd Cir. Ct. of Appeals. AFFIRMED 1/11/02. City did not appeal further.q
City of New York 5/20/00US Dist. Ct., ED NY1:00-CV-3641 24 manufacturers and distributors, 3 trade associations Negligent distribution, public nuisance, deceptive advertising NO Defendants did not file a motion to dismiss. Discovery is ongoing at this time.* Stayed pending NY state case.
State of New York 6/26/00NY Superior Ct. NY County402586/00 25 manufacturers and distributors Negligent distribution, public nuisance NO DISMISSED 8/10/01 by trial court. Appealed. AG argued 5/10/02 to reinstate case. Appeals Court AFFIRMED trial court ruling 6/24/03.
Jersey City v. Smith & Wesson et al 3/28/02Sup. Ct. Of NJ, Hudson County. 12 manufacturers, 2 dealers, 3 trade associations Public nuisance NO Complaint filed on 3/28/02.
TRENDING NOW
Arizona: Anti-Gun Lawmakers Waste No Time Taking Aim at Second Amendment Rights

Friday, November 6, 2026

Arizona: Anti-Gun Lawmakers Waste No Time Taking Aim at Second Amendment Rights

Just hours after Election Day, anti-gun lawmakers in Arizona are already signaling plans to pursue gun control in 2027, leaving law-abiding Arizonans to face the harsh reality that a consequential legislative session lies ahead.  

The Election is Over: Now the Real Work Begins

News  

Wednesday, November 4, 2026

The Election is Over: Now the Real Work Begins

While the complete picture from the 2026 midterm elections is still emerging, the results, to say the least, were not what gun owners wanted. Anti-gun forces took control of the U.S. Senate and House of ...

Article by NRA-ILA Litigation Director Joseph Greenlee and Professor George Mocsary Published in Yale Law Journal Forum

News  

Monday, November 2, 2026

Article by NRA-ILA Litigation Director Joseph Greenlee and Professor George Mocsary Published in Yale Law Journal Forum

A new Essay authored by NRA-ILA Litigation Director Joseph Greenlee and University of Wyoming College of Law Professor George Mocsary has been published in the Yale Law Journal Forum.

Jive Turkeys: Everytown Gears Up to Spoil Thanksgiving with Gobbledygook

News  

Monday, November 17, 2025

Jive Turkeys: Everytown Gears Up to Spoil Thanksgiving with Gobbledygook

Thanksgiving in America isn’t just about food, family and football. According to a survey published by casino.ca (with its Great Thanksgiving Family Feud Map), the holiday typically “comes with a slice of family chaos and a touch of ...

Trump’s Gun Rights Policies Making America Safe Again

News  

Monday, November 2, 2026

Trump’s Gun Rights Policies Making America Safe Again

“Crime’s way down thanks to Trump — Dems will fight to send it back up,” warns an editorial in the N.Y. Post. “Law-and-order works. Immigration enforcement works. And — like it or not — Trump’s ...

New York:  Gov. Kathy Hochul Signs Gun Ban in State Budget Process

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

New York: Gov. Kathy Hochul Signs Gun Ban in State Budget Process

On Wednesday, May 27, Gov. Kathy Hochul signed S.9005C, which “enacts into law major components” of the state’s public protection and general government budget.

The Hunting Vote: What’s at Stake in 2026 and Beyond

News  

Monday, November 2, 2026

The Hunting Vote: What’s at Stake in 2026 and Beyond

As votes are now being cast nationwide, one influential voting bloc is drawing renewed attention: America's hunters, sportsmen, and sportswomen.

U.S. House Passes Repeal of Social Security Administration Gun Grab, Begins Rolling Back Obama Era Executive Gun Control

News  

Friday, February 3, 2017

U.S. House Passes Repeal of Social Security Administration Gun Grab, Begins Rolling Back Obama Era Executive Gun Control

On Thursday, the U.S. House of Representatives issued a strong statement in support of the Second Amendment by passing H.J. Res. 40, which would repeal Barack Obama’s scandalous attempt to grab guns from thousands of vulnerable, ...

District Court Declines to Enter Agreement to Invalidate Florida’s Waiting Period Law in NRA Case and Invites Amici Participation

Thursday, October 29, 2026

District Court Declines to Enter Agreement to Invalidate Florida’s Waiting Period Law in NRA Case and Invites Amici Participation

Yesterday, U.S. District Judge Steven D. Merryday denied the parties’ joint motion for entry of judgment in the National Rifle Association’s challenge to Florida’s firearm waiting period law. The case, Dunn v. Glass, remains pending ...

Different Election, Same Billionaire, Same Gun Control Agenda

News  

Monday, October 26, 2026

Different Election, Same Billionaire, Same Gun Control Agenda

Another election, same former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg working to shape the nation’s gun laws. For years, NRA has exposed Bloomberg’s relentless efforts to export New York style gun restrictions to the rest ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.