Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Free Speech Is Essential To Protecting The Bill Of Rights

Thursday, January 1, 2015

The stunning 2014 election victories–increasing the pro-Second Amendment majority in the U.S. House of Representatives and installing a pro-freedom majority in the U.S. Senate, mark a new day—the beginning of a restoration of liberty for our country.

Voters, led by NRA members across the nation, resoundingly said “no” to President Barack Obama’s “transformation” of our great nation and they said “no” to his unconstitutional abuse of executive power.

These historic mid-term elections would not have been possible without Americans’ unfettered access to the Internet—the freest, most open means of communication in history.

Nowhere was that more accurately demonstrated than with the geometric power of NRA-inspired gun owners.

The Internet is the ultimate contemporary amplification of the First Amendment.

Without the Internet, Americans would have known nothing about Operation Fast and Furious—the Obama administration’s government-sponsored gun-running to Mexican drug cartels resulted in body counts in Mexico. Then the administration used those deaths as an excuse for pressing new gun controls.

Without the Internet, the Obama big-media cover-up of the murder of our diplomats and brave security personnel by terrorists in Benghazi, Libya would never have been challenged.

Without the Internet, most Americans would never have known about the Obama administration’s weaponizing of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) against conservative groups.

Without the Internet, Americans would have known little about any of the serial lies of the president and the abuse of power on a host of issues.

And for us—for the NRA—without the Internet our message of freedom to the general public would have been limited, ridiculed, twisted or quashed by the big corporate media.

As the archtype corporate media censor, former NBC News anchor, Tom Brokaw, declared, “the Internet works best when there are gatekeepers. … people making determinations and judgments about what information is relevant and factual and useful.”

In that pre-Internet universe, big-media gatekeepers fostered a nation of low-information voters. To the gatekeepers, individual citizens were treated as too stupid to seek and sort facts, opinion and information. With big media, it is still true today.

One remarkable aspect of the Internet is that it has been essential to high information voters—a term that perfectly describes NRA members and the majority of people who stand with us.

The Internet is a totally free marketplace for ideas, open to all sides of an issue. With that free access to facts, we win the debate. The Internet offers boundless free choice.

Despite the midterm elections, President Obama is unrepentant, swearing to continue his lawless “rule” by executive fiat. Among his administration’s goals is to extinguish free speech on the Internet.

Recently, the leader of the Obama faction on the Federal Election Commission (FEC) announced a major effort to bring the Internet under the regulatory heel of the federal government.

Ann M. Ravel, FEC vice chairman, recently threatened that the federal government cannot “turn a blind eye to the Internet’s force in the political arena.”  She announced a major push in the coming year to bring about total regulation of political speech on the Web. In her world, advocacy on the Internet would be subject to inspection, fines and criminal referral under what would essentially be a free speech star-chamber.

The challenge arose when the commission deadlocked on a complaint brought by an entity partially funded by billionaire gun-banner George Soros. At issue were YouTube videos exposing and opposing Obama policies.

With a 3-3 commission split, the demand for Internet censorship was voted moot. But a change in one vote could open the way for an oppressive move by the agency to further regulate First Amendment rights.

Vowing to “fight any additional regulation on online political speech,” the Republican Chairman of the FEC, Lee E. Goodman, warned, “I cannot imagine a regulatory regime that would put government censors on the Internet, daily culling YouTube video posts for violations of law—nothing short of a Chinese censorship board.”

As with the Second Amendment, the NRA is at the forefront of protecting the rights of all Americans guaranteed under the First Amendment.

To that end, we are pledged to fight any government oversight of the free speech universe of the Internet. The future of the Second Amendment depends on it.

IN THIS ARTICLE
James Porter Election 2014
TRENDING NOW
FBI Releases Final Crime Report for 2025 to the Dismay of Firearm Prohibitionists

News  

Monday, August 24, 2026

FBI Releases Final Crime Report for 2025 to the Dismay of Firearm Prohibitionists

There has been a certain amount of anticipation while the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) analyzed the available crime data for last year. The speculation among many was that the report would be, not just ...

DOJ Relaunches Federal Firearms Rights Restoration with New Final Rule

News  

Monday, August 24, 2026

DOJ Relaunches Federal Firearms Rights Restoration with New Final Rule

On August 20, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) published a final rule in the Federal Register that establishes application standards for those seeking relief from federal firearm disabilities under the Gun Control Act of ...

SCOTUS Statutory Ruling Not the Final Word on Biden-Era “Frame or Receiver” Rule

News  

Monday, August 24, 2026

SCOTUS Statutory Ruling Not the Final Word on Biden-Era “Frame or Receiver” Rule

For years, NRA-ILA has closely followed and reported on the legal and regulatory saga surrounding the Biden-Harris administration’s so-called “Frame or Receiver” rule. 

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

News  

Monday, August 17, 2026

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

On August 12, we reported on an important development in the ongoing litigation over the National Firearms Act (NFA) filed by multiple plaintiffs in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. These included, ...

ATF Director Corrects Gun Control Advocates on Regulatory Reform

News  

Monday, August 17, 2026

ATF Director Corrects Gun Control Advocates on Regulatory Reform

In a stark departure from the last administration, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is taking gun control advocates to task for their sensationalist rhetoric and questionable legal claims. 

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

In another major victory for the National Rifle Association and law-abiding gun owners, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas today held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for ...

DOJ’s Post Office Directive Marks Another Second Amendment Milestone

News  

Monday, August 17, 2026

DOJ’s Post Office Directive Marks Another Second Amendment Milestone

For decades, federal law and United States Postal Service regulations turned one of the most ordinary stops in American life, your local post office, into a federal “gun free zone.”  That changed on August 12 with ...

California: Multiple Anti-Gun Bills Still Alive as Legislature Enters Final Week

Friday, August 21, 2026

California: Multiple Anti-Gun Bills Still Alive as Legislature Enters Final Week

The California Legislature enters its final full week of the 2026 Legislative Session on Monday, with several anti-gun bills eligible for floor votes. The most egregious bills include AB 2047, which further restricts the use ...

What Does the Texas NFA Decision Mean for You?

News  

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

What Does the Texas NFA Decision Mean for You?

On August 5, 2026, Judge Wesley Hendrix of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns ...

DOJ Withdraws Appeal in Challenge to Post Office Firearms Ban

News  

Monday, July 27, 2026

DOJ Withdraws Appeal in Challenge to Post Office Firearms Ban

Another significant victory has emerged in the ongoing effort to roll back unconstitutional restrictions on the right to bear arms in places that millions of law-abiding Americans visit every day in every state in towns ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.