Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News Second Amendment

Famed Law Professor, Defense Attorney Latest to Suggest Second Amendment Needs to Go

Friday, July 31, 2015

Famed Law Professor, Defense Attorney Latest to Suggest Second Amendment Needs to Go

The legal profession is full of blowhards, egomaniacs, hypocrites, and elitists, but even so, rarely are all those qualities present in a single individual to the same degree as in Alan Dershowitz. At age 28, Dershowitz became the youngest full professor of law in history with his appointment at Harvard. And, yes, it went to his head. He has written that he “does not hide behind the distorting shield of false humility” and has even suggested things might have gone differently for Jesus if he had been there to represent him. When not busy indoctrinating impressionable law students in his own particular brand of politics, Prof. Dershowitz has advocated on behalf of various celebrity clients, including in highly-publicized cases involving allegations of murderous domestic violence. 

Despite his reputation in some circles as a civil rights champion, Dershowitz is no fan of the Second Amendment. He has advocated for a variety of gun controls, including banning all semi-automatic firearms. As he said on the (since cancelled) Piers Morgan show, “If I could ban 100 percent of guns without violating the Constitution, I would do that ….” In the same appearance, he called the idea that guns have a role in protecting liberty “a myth.” Nevertheless, at least at one point, he was willing to go on record as admitting the Second Amendment protects an “individual right to ownership of guns,” although subject to regulation.  

Nevertheless, Dershowitz (who admitted in 2003 that he's never held a pistol) on Monday claimed America’s “experiment” with private ownership of firearms “has failed miserably.” During an appearance on Newsmax TV, he went on to say, “If I could write the Bill of Rights over again, I would skip amendment number two. We’re the only country in the world that puts in our Constitution the right to bear arms.”   

Even though Dershowitz is famed for his expansive readings of other provisions of the Bill of Rights, he would have no problem regulating the Second Amendment into oblivion.  “What is needed,” he said, “is some very tough legislation on both the federal and state level to make it much, much harder to get guns and to create a presumption against gun ownership instead of a presumption in favor of gun ownership ….”

Although perhaps the most obnoxious, Dershowitz is by no means the first legal prima donna to suggest rewriting the Bill of Rights to eliminate the Second Amendment. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has publicly suggested that a “future, wiser court” could revisit the landmark Heller decision, which recognized a private right to arms under the Second Amendment. Later, in a televised appearance from Cairo, Egypt, Justice Ginsburg remarked that she “would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012.” 

More recently, another dissenter from the Heller case, former U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, wrote an entire book about how he would refashion the U.S. Constitution to his liking. Among his suggestions is limiting “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” in the Second Amendment with the phrase, “when serving in the militia.” 

While we at the NRA don’t think much of their constitutional scholarship, we can at least credit these influential legal thinkers for their candor and for illustrating the true philosophical underpinnings of the gun control movement. No matter how else they may couch their rhetoric – most recently as “gun safety” proponents, gun control advocates simply hate guns and do not trust the American people to have them.  It should surprise no one that the legal elites among them are perfectly willing to repeal or judicially nullify the Second Amendment entirely.  

The next U.S. president could appoint perhaps three or even four Supreme Court justices to a bench where the Heller and McDonald decisions currently survive by one vote. The importance of who makes those appointments should not be lost on those who value the right to keep and bear arms. Whatever else can be said of his tendency towards incessant bloviation, that’s one lesson from Prof. Dershowitz we all should heed.

 

 

  

TRENDING NOW
JP Morgan, in Growing Trend, Backtracks on Anti-Gun Policies

News  

Monday, February 9, 2026

JP Morgan, in Growing Trend, Backtracks on Anti-Gun Policies

Beginning with the Obama-Biden administration, financial institutions developed a troubled relationship with the firearms industry.

New Mexico: Sweeping Gun Control Bill Passes Senate

Sunday, February 8, 2026

New Mexico: Sweeping Gun Control Bill Passes Senate

Last night, the New Mexico Senate passed an omnibus gun control package by a vote of 21 to 17 that would severely undermine the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding New Mexicans and threaten the viability ...

Virginia: Gun Control on Senate Floor Today

Monday, February 9, 2026

Virginia: Gun Control on Senate Floor Today

Today, February 9th, the Senate will vote on several gun control bills, including the semi-auto and magazine ban and the industry liability bill.

Virginia Gun Owners Face Magazine Confiscation!

Monday, February 2, 2026

Virginia Gun Owners Face Magazine Confiscation!

Astute Virginia gun owners anticipated terrible gun control legislation from the 2026 General Assembly. Still, some may be shocked to learn that anti-rights zealots in the Virginia Senate have advanced a bill to CONFISCATE standard capacity firearm ...

AI Bias on Guns, Crime: Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? No.

News  

Monday, February 9, 2026

AI Bias on Guns, Crime: Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? No.

It’s bad enough that anti-gun activists and politicians, aided by the mainstream media, are busy pushing out lies and fantasies about guns and gun control, but now inanimate chatbots and artificial intelligence (AI) tools are ...

Connecticut: Draconian Pistol Ban Introduced in Hartford

Friday, February 6, 2026

Connecticut: Draconian Pistol Ban Introduced in Hartford

As a new legislative session begins in Connecticut, it certainly feels like Groundhog Day again as Gov. Ned Lamont unveiled his latest swipe at law-abiding gun owners.  The state’s Chief Executive came out of the ...

North Carolina: Permitless Carry Veto Override Vote Postponed

Tuesday, January 13, 2026

North Carolina: Permitless Carry Veto Override Vote Postponed

Today, the North Carolina House of Representatives rescheduled this morning’s veto override on Senate Bill 50, Freedom to Carry NC, to February 9, 2026.

Maryland: House Judiciary Committee to Hear Handgun Ban

Monday, February 9, 2026

Maryland: House Judiciary Committee to Hear Handgun Ban

This Wednesday, February 11, the House Judiciary Committee will hear House Bill 577, legislation that would ban many common semi-automatic handguns. Please use the Take Action button below to contact members of the House Judiciary Committee ...

Virginia: Excise Tax on Firearms Continues to Advance, Other Gun Control Stalls

Wednesday, February 11, 2026

Virginia: Excise Tax on Firearms Continues to Advance, Other Gun Control Stalls

As we swiftly approach the legislative crossover deadline in Virginia, radical anti-gun legislators continue to push policies targeting law-abiding gun owners.

New Mexico: Sweeping Gun Control Bill Scheduled for a Hearing on Wednesday

Tuesday, February 10, 2026

New Mexico: Sweeping Gun Control Bill Scheduled for a Hearing on Wednesday

Last night, the New Mexico House assigned the omnibus gun control package to the House Commerce & Economic Development Committee for a hearing on Wednesday at 1:30 PM. If signed into law, the legislation would ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.