Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Democratic Administrations Flip-Flop-Flip on Gun Dealer Licensing

Monday, March 21, 2022

Democratic Administrations Flip-Flop-Flip on Gun Dealer Licensing

Recent Democratic presidential administrations have been all over the place when it comes to gun dealer licensing. In the early 1990s, President Bill Clinton went to great efforts to eliminate as many Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs or gun dealers) as he could. President Barack Obama reversed course and demanded that those marginally engaged in the businessof gun selling acquire an FFL. Now President Joe Bidens administration has the government running the Clinton playbook again operating a zero tolerancepolicy that is shuttering FFLs over trivial violations. This sort of schizophrenic policy-making could give the impression that this strategy” has been motivated by anti-gun politics rather than concerns about violent crime.

It was an article of faith among gun control organizations in the early-1990s that there were just too many gun dealers in the country. Back in the pre-District of Columbia v. Heller days, gun control supporters were more honest about their goals and anything that made guns more obtainable, like a healthy supply of gun dealers, was something they openly opposed.

Never mind the fact that FFLs were, and are, subject to significant federal regulation and help to carry out the federal firearm tracing scheme that gun control proponents contend is vital to public safety. Moreover, this campaign neglected ATFs history of forcing low-volume gun dealersinto the federal licensing scheme. In the 1980s for example, there was evidence of ATF revoking the FFL of a person because he only sold three guns during the year, while simultaneously prosecuting another person for selling three guns that year without a license.

In December 1992, the handgun prohibitionists at the Violence Policy Center published a report titled More Gun Dealers Than Gas Stations.The authors whined that there was a bloated, unmanageable universe of illegitimate FFL holders.VPC took particular aim at small-scale FFLs they termed kitchen-tablegun dealers.

Less than a year later, Clinton targeted these small businesses.

On August 11, 1993 Clinton issued a memorandum for the Secretary of the Treasury on gun dealer licensing. The memo directed the secretary to take whatever steps are necessaryto reduce the number of gun dealers. Clinton complained, 30 percent of licensees engage in a limited level of business, typically out of private residences.” At Clintons behest, ATF implemented regulatory restrictions that sought to create a minimum threshold of business activity for FFL eligibility.

Clintons attack on small-scale FFLs proved effective, with the number of gun dealers dropping 80 percent between 1994 and 2007. In 2006, Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence Director Dennis Henigan called Clintons assault on firearm commerce a major policy success.

Shedding doubt on Henigans dubious characterization, in January 2016 Obama reversed course on the Clinton-era policy.

By that year, so-called universalbackground checks were gun control proponentsobsession. Having failed to curb private firearm transfers in April 2013 with the Manchin-Toomey amendment, gun controllers were eager to stretch federal law to require background checks on a wider array of gun sales.

Under federal law, those engaged in the businessof selling firearms must obtain an FFL and conduct background checks on prospective buyers. Those who sell guns out of a personal collection without doing so with the principal objective of livelihood and profitdo not need to be licensed with the federal government and are not required by federal law to conduct background checks.

Understanding that the Gun Control Act of 1968 and the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986 limited the federal governments ability to regulate the private transfer of firearms, the Obama administration released a document clarifying the circumstances under which a person must obtain an FFL. Titled, Do I need a license to buy and sell firearms?,the guidance explained the relevant federal statutes and regulations concerning firearm dealing and summarized the administrations view of the controlling case law.

In a fact sheetaccompanying the guidance, the Obama administration made clear that their goal was to get more individuals into the federal licensing scheme, and thus increase the number of firearm transfers that were subject to a background check. The document described the goal of the Administrations efforts as ensur[ing] that anyone who is engaged in the businessof selling firearms is licensed and conducts background checks on their customers.In direct contrast to Clinton-era policy, the fact sheetstated,

Quantity and frequency of sales are relevant indicators. There is no specific threshold number of firearms purchased or sold that triggers the licensure requirement. But it is important to note that even a few transactions, when combined with other evidence, can be sufficient to establish that a person is “engaged in the business.” For example, courts have upheld convictions for dealing without a license when as few as two firearms were sold or when only one or two transactions took place, when other factors also were present.

Biden appears to have characteristically forgotten about the Obama administrations effort to increase the number of FFLs.

On June 23, 2021, the Biden administration announced a new policy of zero tolerance for rogue gun dealers that willfully violate the law.The policy further specified that [a]bsent extraordinary circumstances that would need to be justified to the Director, ATF will seek to revoke the licenses of dealers the first time that they violate federal law...for certain specified violations.

Then, last December, ATF updated its Federal Firearms Licensee Quick Reference and Best Practices Guide. The updated guide makes clear that ATF will, absent extraordinary circumstances, initiate proceedings to revoke the license of any dealer that has committed a willful regulatory violation of the Gun Control Act (GCA) for specified violations.

Despite the Biden administrations colorful characterization of the dealers they claim to be targeting, their zero tolerancepolicy can result in the revocation of a well-meaning gun dealers FFL for minor mistakes, including simple paperwork errors. The new zero tolerancepolicy has a clear aim of reducing the number of federally licensed dealers, which will in turn make it more difficult for law-abiding Americans to exercise their Second Amendment rights.

So, it seems the Democratic strategy is to decrease, then increase, then decrease gun dealers in order to reduce violent crime. That confused approach to the federal firearm licensing regime makes little sense if taken at face value. However, more cynical observers may detect an overarching pattern in the madness: Frustrate law-abiding gun owners by whatever means possible.

TRENDING NOW
CBS Report: Chicago’s Responsible Gun Owners Wrongfully Arrested, Charged

News  

Monday, October 27, 2025

CBS Report: Chicago’s Responsible Gun Owners Wrongfully Arrested, Charged

The Windy City has its fair share of problems, but a lack of violent criminals isn’t one of them, as anyone who takes a moment to look through local crime news source CWB Chicago knows for a ...

Major Digital Currency’s Terms of Use Prohibit Firearm and Ammunition Sales

News  

Monday, October 20, 2025

Major Digital Currency’s Terms of Use Prohibit Firearm and Ammunition Sales

So much of the energy surrounding the digital currency space has been aimed at bringing forth a new liberty. 

NRA-ILA Files Comments on DOJ’s Relief from Disabilities Rulemaking

News  

Monday, October 27, 2025

NRA-ILA Files Comments on DOJ’s Relief from Disabilities Rulemaking

Last Monday, NRA-ILA (ILA) filed comments in response to a proposed rulemaking by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to revive the government’s “relief from disabilities” program for people categorically prohibited from acquiring or possessing firearms. 

Trump Continues Commitment to Gun Owners

News  

Monday, October 27, 2025

Trump Continues Commitment to Gun Owners

We’ve covered the numerous ways in which President Donald Trump has used his office to defend or advance our rights protected under the Second Amendment. 

Taxpayer-Funded Orgs Bankroll Ad Council “Children” and Firearms Propaganda

News  

Monday, October 27, 2025

Taxpayer-Funded Orgs Bankroll Ad Council “Children” and Firearms Propaganda

The idiot box has been living up to the nickname.

North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Friday, October 24, 2025

North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Last week the North Carolina General Assembly briefly returned from recess and re-referred Senate Bill 50, Freedom to Carry NC, to the House Rules Committee.

NRA-ILA Files Reply Brief Pressing the U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Its Challenge to the NFA’s Restrictions on Short-Barreled Rifles

Thursday, October 23, 2025

NRA-ILA Files Reply Brief Pressing the U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Its Challenge to the NFA’s Restrictions on Short-Barreled Rifles

Today, the National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) filed a Reply Brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to hear a challenge to the National Firearms Act of 1934’s restrictions on short-barreled rifles in a ...

From Printers to Panic: Everytown Summit on “3D Printed Firearms” Targets Progress

News  

Monday, October 27, 2025

From Printers to Panic: Everytown Summit on “3D Printed Firearms” Targets Progress

Recently, Everytown for Gun Safety hosted a 3D Printed Firearms Summit in New York City with the goal being to “build cross-sector collaboration and chart actionable strategies to stem the tide of 3D-printed firearm (3DPF) related violence.” 

Urban Crime Spike “the Most Overlooked U.S. Crime Story in Recent Years”

News  

Monday, October 20, 2025

Urban Crime Spike “the Most Overlooked U.S. Crime Story in Recent Years”

It was a standard talking point of the Biden White House that violent crime had dropped by record levels under the Biden-Harris administration, attributed in part to its support of gun control measures.

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging California’s Glock Ban

Monday, October 13, 2025

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging California’s Glock Ban

Today, the National Rifle Association—along with Firearms Policy Coalition, Second Amendment Foundation, Poway Weapons & Gear, and two NRA members—filed a lawsuit challenging California’s Glock ban.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.