Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Bloomberg’s Mayors, Back in the News!

Monday, November 18, 2024

Bloomberg’s Mayors, Back in the News!

Just a few short weeks ago, we wrote about Michael Bloomberg’s controversy-dogged gun control organization, Mayors Against Illegal Guns (MAIG), and how another high-ranking member of the group had been indicted for allegedly committing serious crimes: bribery, campaign finance, and conspiracy felonies. MAIG was created by then-New York City Mayor Bloomberg in 2006 to further his radical gun control agenda at the state and local levels, and since then, its anti-gun mayors have regularly appeared in the headlines on being charged with, pleading guilty to, or convicted of various kinds of illegal behavior.    

It’s time to revisit this topic again, as breaking news reveals yet another MAIG-associated civic leader has been caught up in a federal criminal investigation. On November 7, the U.S. Department of Justice unsealed indictments charging Chokwe Lumumba, the Mayor of Jackson, Mississippi (along with Hinds County District Attorney Jody E. Owens II, and Aaron Banks, the president of the Jackson City Council) with bribery and conspiracy felonies.

Mayor Lumumba’s city is listed as a “coalition member” of MAIG, and he has supported various MAIG/ Everytown initiatives in the past. In 2021, for example, as one of the MAIG mayors “elected to ensure the safety of our residents,” Lumumba signed a letter calling for the confirmation of David Chipman to head the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). The letter states that the appointment would “benefit our efforts” to curb criminal conduct like the “continued trafficking of illegal guns” and cites the need to “regulat[e] the gun industry to root out bad actors.”

Lumumba’s other gun-control exploits include an April 2020 executive order in which he purported to suspend the state’s “open carry law” throughout the city during the COVID-19 civil emergency, despite Mississippi’s firearm preemption law which generally prohibits any municipality from adopting laws that restrict the possession, carrying, transportation, sale, transfer or ownership of firearms. At the same time, Lumumba launched an online petition (“Join Jackson Mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba in the fight to repeal the Open Carry Law in Mississippi!”) urging members of the public to support his demand that the state law at issue be repealed. According to the petition, although Lumumba had “no principal disagreement with the Second Amendment right to bear arms,…a right that interferes with another person’s right to live is not a legitimate right to be maintained.” The petition was a dismal flop, failing to reach even a minimal 200-signature threshold.

Lumumba’s executive order fared no better. It was almost immediately condemned as invalid and unconstitutional by the Mississippi Attorney General, who found “no evidence that the State’s open carry law was implicated in” the crimes the mayor cited as the justification for the order. In quick succession, the mayor’s order was challenged in a civil rights lawsuit that culminated in a consent degree, which continues to prohibit the City of Jackson, the mayor and city council, and all other city agents or employees from adopting “any orders, resolutions, ordinances, policies, or practices which have the purpose or effect of directly or indirectly prohibiting, restricting, or inhibiting the open carry of firearms,” unless and until a valid state law permits them to do so.

While MAIG’s mayors fret about “bad actors” in the gun industry, the federal Department of Justice works at rooting out rotten apples in the public sector. The press release regarding the November indictment of Lumumba, Owens, and Banks observes that “[o]fficials who abuse their positions of authority to enrich themselves undermine public confidence in government. The Justice Department is committed to restoring that confidence by working with its law enforcement partners to investigate and prosecute public corruption.”

That document alleges that Lumumba accepted a bribe of $50,000 from FBI undercover employees posing as Nashville real estate developers, “in exchange for exerting his influence and taking official action relating to the Developers’ proposed project in downtown Jackson ... [T]he bribe payments were concealed as five $10,000 campaign-donation checks from third-party entities and individuals, including Owens. Lumumba then laundered that money through his campaign account before cashing out a portion of the payment.” (A strange little detail in the indictment claims that when the FBI raided Owens’s district attorney office, they discovered cash paid by the purported developers to Owens in a “lockbox made to appear like a book bearing the title ‘The Constitution of the United States of America.’”)

The press release lists the charges against Lumumba as one count of conspiracy to commit federal program bribery, honest services wire fraud, and money laundering; one count of federal program bribery; one count of using a facility in interstate commerce in furtherance of unlawful activity; one count of honest services wire fraud; and one count of money laundering. If convicted, he potentially faces decades in prison.

The FBI continues to investigate the case. Lumumba has denied the accusations and pled not guilty to the charges, and it must be emphasized that a criminal charge is only an allegation that a defendant has committed a violation of the criminal law and is not evidence of guilt. All defendants are presumed innocent until convicted in a court of law.

Two major federal bribery and corruption indictments against MAIG members have been announced in just over a month, yet these are leading public officials who clamor about “gun industry accountability” for the acts of third-party criminals, demand the repeal of lawful open carry and other “harmful laws” (like permitless carry and state preemption), and smear law-abiding gun owners as the “armed intimidation” that threatens “our democracy.” 

While MAIG and its propagandistic politicians busy themselves with “reimagining public safety” (whatever that means) for the rest of us, a reimagining of their mission and values may be more of a priority – starting with the amendment of the MAIG “Statement of Principles” that members are asked to sign to include a pledge to curb criminal conduct by refraining from committing actual felonies and other illegal acts themselves. 

TRENDING NOW
U.S. Department of Justice Declares Age 18-20 Handgun Sales Ban Unconstitutional

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

U.S. Department of Justice Declares Age 18-20 Handgun Sales Ban Unconstitutional

On September 17, the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) issued a memorandum opinion to answer the question “whether restricting young adults from buying firearms comports with the Second Amendment as the Supreme ...

DOJ Calls Time on Minnesota’s Second Amendment Waiting Game

News  

Monday, September 28, 2026

DOJ Calls Time on Minnesota’s Second Amendment Waiting Game

For too long, Minnesota Governor Tim Waltz and his anti-gun allies in the state have treated the exercise of a constitutional right as something subject to government permission and whatever wait is required for the ...

Virginia Gun Shops Brace for the New Jerseyfication of the Commonwealth

News  

Monday, September 28, 2026

Virginia Gun Shops Brace for the New Jerseyfication of the Commonwealth

Jay Jones, the anti-gun but pro-bullets to the head Virginia attorney general, announced on September 15 the creation of the Firearms Accountability & Industry Responsibility (FAIR) Unit within the Civil and Criminal Justice & Public ...

“Law abiding citizens with an AR-15 are not a threat to anyone” — Law Enforcement Groups Weigh in on Supreme Court “Assault Weapons” Cases

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

“Law abiding citizens with an AR-15 are not a threat to anyone” — Law Enforcement Groups Weigh in on Supreme Court “Assault Weapons” Cases

The Trace, the “newsroom” funded by anti-gun extremist Michael Bloomberg, reported in June on the extent to which the NRA-backed NYSRPA v. Bruen case has, to date, rebuilt the modern Second Amendment landscape.

Support of Self-Defense for Law-Abiding Citizens Continues to Spread Globally

News  

Monday, September 28, 2026

Support of Self-Defense for Law-Abiding Citizens Continues to Spread Globally

In spite of some countries deciding they cannot trust their own citizens with firearms, other countries seem to be rejecting this policy…at least a bit.  

Trump DOJ Sues San Jose, Ca., Over $1,600 Concealed Carry Licensing Fee

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Trump DOJ Sues San Jose, Ca., Over $1,600 Concealed Carry Licensing Fee

Do you know the way to San Jose? Dionne Warwick famously asked in her 1968 hit song. Well, Assistant U.S. Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon certainly does, and she recently made sure the city was served ...

Everytown Goes Hunting for Credibility

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Everytown Goes Hunting for Credibility

The irony is nothing short of comedy. Multiple outlets are having a field day with the Michael Bloomberg-backed Everytown organization, which has spent years and millions of dollars supporting extreme restrictions on lawful gun ownership, ...

Study Suggests “Safe Storage” Mandates are Ineffective

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Study Suggests “Safe Storage” Mandates are Ineffective

While it likely comes as no surprise to most readers, a recent study suggests that government-mandates that law-abiding gun owners always secure their firearms when “not in use”—usually unloaded, separate from ammunition, and either in ...

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS to Review Lawsuit Blaming Firearm Ads for Criminal Acts

Friday, September 25, 2026

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS to Review Lawsuit Blaming Firearm Ads for Criminal Acts

Today, the National Rifle Association and Second Amendment Foundation filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to grant review in Daniel Defense, LLC v. Lowy. The case asks whether firearm manufacturers can be sued ...

The Fight to Protect the Firearms Industry Continues

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

The Fight to Protect the Firearms Industry Continues

The political lawfare campaign to dismantle the lawful firearms industry by holding it liable for the criminal misuse of its constitutionally protected products should have never started. U.S. tort law has long held that a ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.