Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Good News, Bad News on ATF Director Dettelbach

Monday, January 6, 2025

Good News, Bad News on ATF Director Dettelbach

It’s really just good news to report that Joe Biden’s director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), Steven Dettelbach, has announced his resignation.  The bad news only comes into play for President-elect Donald Trump, because he will be denied the pleasure of firing the most political ATF director we’ve ever seen.

Dettelbach, you will recall, wasn’t Biden’s first choice to head the ATF.  That “honor” went to former ATF-employee David Chipman, who went from being an ATF field agent with a possibly questionable background to a shill for anti-gun extremists.  As opposition to Chipman mounted, his nomination failed spectacularly.  He then mounted a grievance campaign, and returned to being paid by anti-gunners to spout his anti-gun nonsense.

After Chipman came Dettelbach—a slightly less controversial but equally anti-gun extremist.  Perhaps the only positive aspect of the Dettelbach nomination was it brought forth more whining from Chipman.

Dettelbach was ultimately confirmed, and under his “leadership,” the ATF did everything it could to execute the Biden agenda of eviscerating the Second Amendment.  It also faced an incredible number of legal challenges to rules the agency implemented without corresponding legislative mandates from Congress.

Just as a refresher on how our government is supposed to work, Congress passes laws, and if the president signs them, his Executive Branch—under which ATF operates—implements the laws.  The key word here is “implements,” not “rewrites,” as in “rewrites to promote a political agenda that Congress did not consider or intend.”

Biden’s ATF, however, took it upon itself to reinterpret and rewrite a number of regulations in spite of the fact that Congress had, in every case but one, not changed the statutes under which those regulations had operated.

For example, there is the new rule regarding pistol stabilizing braces.  These firearm accessories, developed, in part, to help disabled veterans handle certain firearms more safely and with more accuracy, have been around for decades.  Since 2012, ATF had recognized that stabilizing braces serve a legitimate function and the inclusion of a stabilizing brace on a pistol or other firearm does not automatically subject that firearm to the provisions of the National Firearms Act (NFA).

In 2021, the agency began the process to reinterpret existing law to treat brace-equipped pistols the same as short-barreled rifles and fully automatic firearms, rendering them subject to NFA regulations that require enhanced screening of those who own such items, as well as registration, additional fees (taxes), and other requirements.

The rule has been challenged as unauthorized and has faced a number of legal defeats.

Then there’s the “frame or receiver” rule, which changed decades of ATF regulations regarding the definition of a “firearm”—again, without any change to the federal law under which those regulations operated.  We pointed out ATF intended to go beyond what was spelled out in federal law when a draft of the proposed rule was leaked.  We also submitted detailed comments in opposition to the proposal when it was formally published.

This rule is also facing legal challenges, and has been taken up by the Supreme Court.

Then there is team Biden/Dettelbach circumventing Congress by creatively misinterpreting the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (BSCA) to create a new rule that controls when individuals engage in sufficient commerce in firearms so as to need to be licensed under federal law as a Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL). Under the rule, Biden’s ATF went well beyond statutory authority to fabricate presumptions of when an individual needs to be an FFL. The rule even hedges its bets against its own legality by claiming it is not meant to apply in criminal proceedings (the most common enforcement actions against unlicensed dealers).

This was an attempt to move the needle on Biden’s desire to implement “universal” background checks, even though the very agency that created this rule has also released data undermining the alleged efficacy of “universal” background checks to address crime involving firearms.

Twenty-six states filed suits challenging this rule, as did NRA.

Besides creatively reimagining federal firearm laws, ATF has faced scrutiny over how it has operated under Dettelbach, including a controversial operation in Arkansas the led to the death of the subject being investigated.  There were also questions asked of Dettelbach regarding an alleged ATF-linked Mexico gun trafficking scheme, raising the specter of the Obama-Biden administration’s Operation Fast and Furious scandal.

Dettelbach, apparently fancying himself as media-friendly, even took to television to push his anti-gun ATF propaganda. The results were cringe-inducing.

The fact that Dettelbach quit before he could be fired is just the final nail in the coffin of one of the most blatantly anti-gun political appointees of the Biden administration.  His resignation all but confirms his tenure had little to do with heading an agency ostensibly dedicated to public safety by targeting the most dangerous firearm-related crimes and criminals.  Otherwise, why quit?  If he were as dedicated to professional law enforcement as he claimed, one would think he would stay on, make his case with Trump, then let the chips fall where they may.

On the other hand, if his goal and mandate were to target and harass law-abiding gun owners as well as firearm manufacturers and dealers, it would make sense that he would leave before Trump took office. There is certainly no future in that line of business under the Trump-Vance administration. 

While it is a shame that President-elect Trump will not have the satisfaction of firing someone who should never have been nominated to run the ATF, it is still good he will be gone.

He will not be missed, but we look forward to seeing who will be appointed to replace him.

TRENDING NOW
Update: North Carolina House Reschedules Veto Override Vote

Tuesday, August 26, 2025

Update: North Carolina House Reschedules Veto Override Vote

Today, the House rescheduled the veto override vote on Senate Bill 50, Freedom to Carry NC, to Monday, September 22. 

Florida: Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday Signed by Governor

Monday, July 7, 2025

Florida: Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday Signed by Governor

Governor Ron DeSantis recently signed the Florida Budget for Fiscal Year 2025–2026, which includes a Second Amendment sales tax holiday from September 8 through December 31, 2025. The NRA is thankful for Governor DeSantis’ strong ...

Third Circuit Sua Sponte Takes NRA’s “Assault Firearm” and Magazine Ban Case En Banc

Wednesday, August 27, 2025

Third Circuit Sua Sponte Takes NRA’s “Assault Firearm” and Magazine Ban Case En Banc

Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs v. Attorney Gen. New Jersey is an NRA-supported challenge to New Jersey’s prohibitions on so-called “assault firearms” and magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds.

Arkansas Atrocity Highlights Need for Reform in Rules Governing Carry in Public Parks

News  

Monday, August 25, 2025

Arkansas Atrocity Highlights Need for Reform in Rules Governing Carry in Public Parks

On the heels of the shocking and seemingly random murder of a couple in an Arkansas state park while they were walking a trail with their young children, many are revisiting their self-defense plans in the great ...

Everytown Gun “Safety” Course—Step One: Don’t Own a Gun

News  

Monday, August 25, 2025

Everytown Gun “Safety” Course—Step One: Don’t Own a Gun

Our friends at the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) have reported that Everytown, an active and well-funded anti-gun organization, is now purporting to be branching out into teaching gun owners how to safely handle firearms.

Court Dismisses “Lawfare” Claims Against Maryland Gun Dealers

News  

Monday, February 24, 2025

Court Dismisses “Lawfare” Claims Against Maryland Gun Dealers

“Lawfare” is the misuse of the legal system to damage political or business opponents, either through frivolous lawsuits in which the cost of defending becomes too much to bear or through the pursuit of political ...

Supreme Court Review Sought in NRA-Backed Challenge to California’s Magazine Ban

Friday, August 15, 2025

Supreme Court Review Sought in NRA-Backed Challenge to California’s Magazine Ban

Today, a Petition for Certiorari was filed asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Duncan v. Bonta, a case—backed by the National Rifle Association and California Rifle & Pistol Association—challenging California’s prohibition on magazines capable of holding ...

Florida Urges SCOTUS to Grant Cert in NRA’s Challenge to its Young Adult Purchase Ban and to Rule its Own Law Unconstitutional

Wednesday, August 20, 2025

Florida Urges SCOTUS to Grant Cert in NRA’s Challenge to its Young Adult Purchase Ban and to Rule its Own Law Unconstitutional

In May, the National Rifle Association petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear NRA v. Glass, our challenge to Florida’s ban on firearm purchases by adults under 21.

U.K. Police Target Gardening Tools, Salty Language

News  

Monday, August 18, 2025

U.K. Police Target Gardening Tools, Salty Language

Another week, another set of stories chronicling the sad demise of individual rights in the United Kingdom, where gardeners with pruning tools are treated like dangerous criminals and insulting crooks who plunder your store attracts more police attention ...

Tenth Circuit Holds New Mexico’s 7-Day Waiting Period Unconstitutional in NRA Case

Tuesday, August 19, 2025

Tenth Circuit Holds New Mexico’s 7-Day Waiting Period Unconstitutional in NRA Case

Today, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals held New Mexico’s seven-day waiting period for firearm purchases unconstitutional in Ortega v. Grisham, a case brought by the National Rifle Association and Mountain States Legal Foundation, with the ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.