Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

“Public Order” at the Cost of Public Order

Tuesday, January 21, 2025

“Public Order” at the Cost of Public Order

In recent years, the United Kingdom has served as a cautionary tale for what can happen when citizens don’t adequately safeguard individual rights - most notably, the right to free speech and the right to armed self-defense. This month, the Liberal Democrat party of the U.K. revealed the results of a survey in which Brits were asked their views on the responsiveness of law enforcement. The findings are quite bleak.

Almost half of the adult respondents stated they “were not confident that the police would turn up and properly investigate” if their home was burgled or their car was stolen. For those asked if the crime, instead, was being assaulted in the street, the percentage of those not certain about the police turning up and responding properly was only a slightly lower 41%.

It’s hardly surprising, then, that the same poll showed some respondents had given up on relying on police assistance, even when the circumstances warranted a law enforcement response. Eight percent said that in the past two years, they had needed to call police using 999 (the U.K.’s equivalent of 911) but didn’t do so. Almost 60% gave, as the reasons for their inaction, their belief that the “police would not have the time or the resources to take the incident seriously,” or that the police would take too long to arrive.

The most recently available statistics on “crime outcomes” (June 2024) released by the Home Office in the United Kingdom go some way towards explaining the public’s doubts and reservations about law enforcement. Almost three-quarters (73.3%) of residential burglary offense investigations were closed due to no suspect having been identified; the proportion of those offenses that resulted in a charge/summons (not a conviction) “remained low, at 4.3%.” For vehicle theft offenses (theft from a vehicle, theft of a motor vehicle, and vehicle interference), the overwhelming majority of cases “were closed with no suspect identified (83.8%) and only 2.2% resulted in a charge/summons outcome.” Over half of robbery offenses (50.3%) were closed due to no suspect having been identified, and the proportion of those that resulted in a charge/summons was 6.5%. On violence against the person crimes, those that were unrelated to domestic abuse had a charge rate of 4.9% (although there was a much higher charge/summons rate for homicide offenses).   

Commenting on these figures, a press release by the Liberal Democrats pointed out that overall, the result was that 2,156,075 crimes went unsolved across England and Wales during the year covered by those statistics, the equivalent of almost 6,000 crimes a day going unsolved. In less than 7% of all these cases was a suspect even charged or summonsed.

In this chicken-or-the-egg conundrum, crime victims are less likely to report the incident to police when it is apparent that the outcome, for whatever reason, will be next to nothing. That outcome emboldens criminals and the cycle perpetuates itself, to the detriment of other innocent citizens and at the cost of public trust in government. Worse, U.K. citizens are left with little recourse to defend themselves in the face of government inaction, as the government has long sought to curtail even nonlethal means of self-defense.

While victims of actual crime wonder whether and when police will respond, top law enforcement entities in the U.K. are warning people that some social media posting (or even just the sharing of posts) may result in arrest, criminal prosecution, and imprisonment.

Law enforcement time and resources had previously been frittered away on speech cases. Perhaps emblematic of these was the Merseyside Police campaign to “defeat hate in our community” titled, unbelievably, “Being offensive is an offence.”

British law enforcement has already been busy investigating and recording reports of so-called “non-crime hate incidents” (“an incident or alleged incident which involves or is alleged to involve an act by a person [‘the subject’] which is perceived by a person other than the subject to be motivated – wholly or partly – by hostility or prejudice towards persons with a particular characteristic”). While not treated as crimes, these are nonetheless tracked by police “to help prevent serious crimes which may later occur.” One estimate is that more than 250,000 non-crime hate incidents were recorded by police forces in England and Wales over a five-year period, averaging 66 per day. As U.K. magazine The Critic opined, “Little wonder, then, that the police don’t have time to send an officer round to your house if you report a burglary.”

The U.K. government has now made it clear that what people post online may have serious criminal consequences. Enforcement against online “misinformation” deemed to be harmful comes from the top law enforcement official. Stephen Parkinson, Director of Public Prosecutions and Head of the Crown Prosecution Service has stated that “you may be committing a crime if you repost, repeat or amplify a message which is false, threatening, or stirs up racial/religious hatred... people need to be really aware that if they retweet or share those communications, they are potentially committing criminal offences themselves… if you retweet or you reshare those communications, you will be picked up and you may expect a visit from the police.”

Law enforcement, he said, has “dedicated police officers whose sole task is to scour the internet, scour social media,” and the reach of these investigations and prosecutions could include those that are not even resident in the U.K. “There may be a practical issue in terms of getting hold of them, but I think what people need to understand is that we work very closely with other countries,” said Parkinson. “Obviously, we can extradite people. It may take longer to get them back, but there’s no issue around if we can get them back, then prosecuting them.”

One case resulted in a 25-year-old man being arrested and sentenced to three months’ imprisonment after a “joke” post on TikTok in which he claimed he was being chased by “extreme right-wing rioters.” Such “criminal actions,” said the local Assistant Chief Constable, “will be dealt with quickly and robustly. Whether it is spreading misinformation or being involved in disorder the message is clear – as a service we are ready to respond and deal with any situation robustly.”

In another, a 26-year-old man was sentenced to 38 months’ imprisonment after he copied and pasted, on X, another person’s message, who was herself arrested and bailed on suspicion of inciting racial hatred. During the posts, the man also “accused police of two-tier policing and told someone who said the screenshot and posts could land him in jail that they were delusional.” In his defense, he said, “I disagreed with [the woman] being arrested for their opinion and so I copied and pasted the tweet into X – kind of as a protest.”

In that case, too, a local law enforcement official commented that: “I hope this case sends a very clear message to people who think they can hide behind a screen… This case is not an example of preventing ‘freedom of speech’ as a small minority of people will claim. We stand with our communities and will do everything we can to help them feel safe and protected from crime.”

With the government and law enforcement preoccupied with ensuring a robust response to online lies, “misinformation,” and allegedly offensive “non-crime hate” and normal citizens prevented from obtaining adequate means of self-defense, one must wonder just how safe and protected ordinary Brits feel, having reason to fear the consequences of politically or socially unpopular online activity as well as actual violent crime.

TRENDING NOW
North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Last week the North Carolina General Assembly briefly returned from recess and re-referred Senate Bill 50, Freedom to Carry NC, to the House Rules Committee.

Federal Court Strikes Down Biden Administration’s “Engaged in the Business” Rule in NRA Case

Thursday, October 2, 2025

Federal Court Strikes Down Biden Administration’s “Engaged in the Business” Rule in NRA Case

Yesterday, in Butler v. Bondi, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama held that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives exceeded its statutory authority by issuing its 2024 Final Rule expanding ...

First Affirmative Lawsuit in Support of Gun Owners Filed by Trump’s DOJ

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

First Affirmative Lawsuit in Support of Gun Owners Filed by Trump’s DOJ

California officials’ egregious foot-dragging over the issuance of carry permits has finally attracted the ire of the federal Department of Justice (DOJ). 

President Trump’s GOP Leads Polling on Crime and Guns, To No Surprise

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

President Trump’s GOP Leads Polling on Crime and Guns, To No Surprise

A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll revealed that Americans know the President Donald Trump-led Republican Party has a better plan than their Democratic Party opponents on crime and gun control.

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Fifth Circuit Case Challenging the Federal Switchblade Act

Friday, October 3, 2025

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Fifth Circuit Case Challenging the Federal Switchblade Act

Yesterday, the National Rifle Association filed an amicus brief in Knife Rights, Inc. v. Bondi, urging the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas’s decision upholding the Federal ...

Trump Administration Repeals Biden Era Firearms Export Crackdown

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

Trump Administration Repeals Biden Era Firearms Export Crackdown

Last Monday, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) at the U.S. Department of Commerce published a final rule that reversed a crackdown on the commercial export of firearms from the U.S. to other countries.

Trust in Mass Media Craters to New Lows, in Single Digits With Republicans

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

Trust in Mass Media Craters to New Lows, in Single Digits With Republicans

There’s an old saying that rings especially true to Second Amendment supporters: If you don’t read the news, you’re uninformed.

Alphabet Eases the Reins on Censorship; Will Gun Content Eventually Benefit?

News  

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

Alphabet Eases the Reins on Censorship; Will Gun Content Eventually Benefit?

With the free speech debate recently co-opted by one TV host’s use of false and incendiary remarks about his political opponents, it might have been easy to miss another important First Amendment story last week. 

Canada’s Public Safety Minister on Gun Ban & Confiscation: “Don’t Ask Me to Explain the Logic”

News  

Monday, September 29, 2025

Canada’s Public Safety Minister on Gun Ban & Confiscation: “Don’t Ask Me to Explain the Logic”

There have been multiple developments on the Canadian gun grab and ban in the last few days, but the most astounding has got to be a leaked bombshell recording of the Liberal Public Safety Minister, ...

U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Challenge to Hawaii’s Private Property Default Carry Ban

Friday, October 3, 2025

U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Challenge to Hawaii’s Private Property Default Carry Ban

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the petition for certiorari in Wolford v. Lopez, a challenge to Hawaii’s law forbidding carry on private property open to the public (such as restaurants, gas stations, and grocery stores) ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.