Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Report: Notorious NYPD License Division Drags its Feet on Bruen Compliance

Monday, March 3, 2025

Report: Notorious NYPD License Division Drags its Feet on Bruen Compliance

Following its landmark loss at the U.S. Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022), which made clear law-abiding citizens have a right to bear arms outside the home for self-defense, New York continues to thumb its nose at the Second Amendment. A recent article from Spectrum News NY1, summarized the woeful state of affairs at the notorious New York City Police Department License Division and the New Yorkers victim to their rule.

Recall, the Bruen case concerned a challenge to New York’s discretionary licensing scheme that required concealed carry license applicants to demonstrate “proper cause” to carry a firearm outside of their home. New York, and particularly New York City, routinely used the requirement and the discretion it afforded the government to deny law-abiding citizens the ability to protect themselves.

Following the decision, New York was supposed to join the rest of the nation in having a Right-to-Carry regime. Under this system, carry licenses are granted to everyone who meets a set list of defined criteria – such as not being a convicted violent felon or having completed rudimentary firearms training. In most jurisdictions, this involves simply running a National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) inquiry, or the state equivalent.

In the wake of their Supreme Court defeat, New York hastily enacted the ill-named “Concealed Carry Improvement Act.” The updated carry regime still required applicants to convince government officials of their “good moral character” to secure a license. The NYPD License Division employs investigators to conduct what appear to be essentially open-ended background checks on prospective licensees.

Using the story of Manhattan carry license holder Jason Tsulis as a jumping off point, NY1 noted that he “faced unexplained delays in getting his license.” In fact, “Tsulis had an approved application but there was a delay in getting the actual license. To receive it, he had to get a lawyer to petition the NYPD in court.”

According to NY1, the problems at the NYPD License Division are so acute, that “[h]iring a lawyer has become an unofficial part of the process in New York.” The news outlet quoted one applicant who stated, “I have not received any communication from an investigator. I am now in the 11th month.”

According to an attorney who specializes in navigating the New York City carry license bureaucracy, the problem with the NYPD License Division is widespread. NY1 reported,

to attorney Mirel Fisch, "the License Division is simply not acting."

She has filed court petitions on behalf of 20 concealed carry applicants, including Tsulis. She also sent the NYPD about 250 letters.

These petitions typically get action.

"In New York, it’s almost taboo to talk about. People don’t like guns, people don’t like the idea of you having a gun, but it is a civil right," she said. "It’s your right to bear arms."

But that right is no match for the NYPD License Division.

"I think there’s just complete mismanagement," she said.

Moreover, NY1 revealed that in October there was a data breach at the License Division, explaining,

NY1 confirmed that in October, an NYPD licensing official emailing an applicant attached an intake spreadsheet containing the names of more than 8,000 firearm permit applicants from 2023 through October 2024 — more than 6,000 of the applicants were seeking concealed carry permits.

This isn’t the first time the NYPD License Division’s deplorable performance has made headlines. In the late 2010s the License Division was the subject of a federal corruption probe for trading handgun licenses for bribes.

Help could be on the way.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case Antonyuk v. James is currently on petition for certiorari at the Supreme Court. The case challenges New York’s requirement that license applicants prove “good moral character” to the state. The plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari pointed out that New York’s current scheme violates Bruen, as

New York simply “replaced” proper cause with good moral character, “while retaining (and even expanding) the open-ended discretion afforded to its licensing officers.”

Thoroughly removing the type of government discretion prohibited by Bruen from the licensing process should help streamline license acquisition by New Yorkers and ensure that the Second Amendment is treated as the Constitutional right that it is rather than a privilege subject to bureaucratic whim (or available only at a price). That is why the NRA has filed an amicus brief at the U.S. Supreme Court supporting the Antonyuk v. James cert petition and will continue to follow this case closely.

TRENDING NOW
Trump Continues Commitment to Gun Owners

News  

Monday, October 27, 2025

Trump Continues Commitment to Gun Owners

We’ve covered the numerous ways in which President Donald Trump has used his office to defend or advance our rights protected under the Second Amendment. 

CBS Report: Chicago’s Responsible Gun Owners Wrongfully Arrested, Charged

News  

Monday, October 27, 2025

CBS Report: Chicago’s Responsible Gun Owners Wrongfully Arrested, Charged

The Windy City has its fair share of problems, but a lack of violent criminals isn’t one of them, as anyone who takes a moment to look through local crime news source CWB Chicago knows for a ...

NRA-ILA Files Comments on DOJ’s Relief from Disabilities Rulemaking

News  

Monday, October 27, 2025

NRA-ILA Files Comments on DOJ’s Relief from Disabilities Rulemaking

Last Monday, NRA-ILA (ILA) filed comments in response to a proposed rulemaking by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to revive the government’s “relief from disabilities” program for people categorically prohibited from acquiring or possessing firearms. 

Taxpayer-Funded Orgs Bankroll Ad Council “Children” and Firearms Propaganda

News  

Monday, October 27, 2025

Taxpayer-Funded Orgs Bankroll Ad Council “Children” and Firearms Propaganda

The idiot box has been living up to the nickname.

NRA-ILA Files Reply Brief Pressing the U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Its Challenge to the NFA’s Restrictions on Short-Barreled Rifles

Thursday, October 23, 2025

NRA-ILA Files Reply Brief Pressing the U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Its Challenge to the NFA’s Restrictions on Short-Barreled Rifles

Today, the National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) filed a Reply Brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to hear a challenge to the National Firearms Act of 1934’s restrictions on short-barreled rifles in a ...

North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Friday, October 24, 2025

North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Last week the North Carolina General Assembly briefly returned from recess and re-referred Senate Bill 50, Freedom to Carry NC, to the House Rules Committee.

Major Digital Currency’s Terms of Use Prohibit Firearm and Ammunition Sales

News  

Monday, October 20, 2025

Major Digital Currency’s Terms of Use Prohibit Firearm and Ammunition Sales

So much of the energy surrounding the digital currency space has been aimed at bringing forth a new liberty. 

From Printers to Panic: Everytown Summit on “3D Printed Firearms” Targets Progress

News  

Monday, October 27, 2025

From Printers to Panic: Everytown Summit on “3D Printed Firearms” Targets Progress

Recently, Everytown for Gun Safety hosted a 3D Printed Firearms Summit in New York City with the goal being to “build cross-sector collaboration and chart actionable strategies to stem the tide of 3D-printed firearm (3DPF) related violence.” 

Grassroots Spotlight: Green Top Outdoor Expo

Take Action  

Monday, October 27, 2025

Grassroots Spotlight: Green Top Outdoor Expo

Earlier this month, your Virginia NRA -ILA Grassroots Team had the honor of participating in the annual Green Top Outdoor Expo, hosted by Green Top Sporting Goods in Ashland, Virginia

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging California’s Glock Ban

Monday, October 13, 2025

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging California’s Glock Ban

Today, the National Rifle Association—along with Firearms Policy Coalition, Second Amendment Foundation, Poway Weapons & Gear, and two NRA members—filed a lawsuit challenging California’s Glock ban.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.