Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Report: Notorious NYPD License Division Drags its Feet on Bruen Compliance

Monday, March 3, 2025

Report: Notorious NYPD License Division Drags its Feet on Bruen Compliance

Following its landmark loss at the U.S. Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022), which made clear law-abiding citizens have a right to bear arms outside the home for self-defense, New York continues to thumb its nose at the Second Amendment. A recent article from Spectrum News NY1, summarized the woeful state of affairs at the notorious New York City Police Department License Division and the New Yorkers victim to their rule.

Recall, the Bruen case concerned a challenge to New York’s discretionary licensing scheme that required concealed carry license applicants to demonstrate “proper cause” to carry a firearm outside of their home. New York, and particularly New York City, routinely used the requirement and the discretion it afforded the government to deny law-abiding citizens the ability to protect themselves.

Following the decision, New York was supposed to join the rest of the nation in having a Right-to-Carry regime. Under this system, carry licenses are granted to everyone who meets a set list of defined criteria – such as not being a convicted violent felon or having completed rudimentary firearms training. In most jurisdictions, this involves simply running a National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) inquiry, or the state equivalent.

In the wake of their Supreme Court defeat, New York hastily enacted the ill-named “Concealed Carry Improvement Act.” The updated carry regime still required applicants to convince government officials of their “good moral character” to secure a license. The NYPD License Division employs investigators to conduct what appear to be essentially open-ended background checks on prospective licensees.

Using the story of Manhattan carry license holder Jason Tsulis as a jumping off point, NY1 noted that he “faced unexplained delays in getting his license.” In fact, “Tsulis had an approved application but there was a delay in getting the actual license. To receive it, he had to get a lawyer to petition the NYPD in court.”

According to NY1, the problems at the NYPD License Division are so acute, that “[h]iring a lawyer has become an unofficial part of the process in New York.” The news outlet quoted one applicant who stated, “I have not received any communication from an investigator. I am now in the 11th month.”

According to an attorney who specializes in navigating the New York City carry license bureaucracy, the problem with the NYPD License Division is widespread. NY1 reported,

to attorney Mirel Fisch, "the License Division is simply not acting."

She has filed court petitions on behalf of 20 concealed carry applicants, including Tsulis. She also sent the NYPD about 250 letters.

These petitions typically get action.

"In New York, it’s almost taboo to talk about. People don’t like guns, people don’t like the idea of you having a gun, but it is a civil right," she said. "It’s your right to bear arms."

But that right is no match for the NYPD License Division.

"I think there’s just complete mismanagement," she said.

Moreover, NY1 revealed that in October there was a data breach at the License Division, explaining,

NY1 confirmed that in October, an NYPD licensing official emailing an applicant attached an intake spreadsheet containing the names of more than 8,000 firearm permit applicants from 2023 through October 2024 — more than 6,000 of the applicants were seeking concealed carry permits.

This isn’t the first time the NYPD License Division’s deplorable performance has made headlines. In the late 2010s the License Division was the subject of a federal corruption probe for trading handgun licenses for bribes.

Help could be on the way.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case Antonyuk v. James is currently on petition for certiorari at the Supreme Court. The case challenges New York’s requirement that license applicants prove “good moral character” to the state. The plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari pointed out that New York’s current scheme violates Bruen, as

New York simply “replaced” proper cause with good moral character, “while retaining (and even expanding) the open-ended discretion afforded to its licensing officers.”

Thoroughly removing the type of government discretion prohibited by Bruen from the licensing process should help streamline license acquisition by New Yorkers and ensure that the Second Amendment is treated as the Constitutional right that it is rather than a privilege subject to bureaucratic whim (or available only at a price). That is why the NRA has filed an amicus brief at the U.S. Supreme Court supporting the Antonyuk v. James cert petition and will continue to follow this case closely.

TRENDING NOW
Declassified Document: Biden-Harris Administration Targeted Gun Owners and Second Amendment Rights Under “Domestic Terrorism” Pretext

News  

Monday, April 21, 2025

Declassified Document: Biden-Harris Administration Targeted Gun Owners and Second Amendment Rights Under “Domestic Terrorism” Pretext

On April 16, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard made good on a promise to expose the ways in which the Biden administration had weaponized the federal government against its political adversaries by releasing the Biden-era “Strategic Implementation Plan ...

Federal Court in Massachusetts Enforces Range Access Statute in Pathbreaking Case

News  

Monday, April 21, 2025

Federal Court in Massachusetts Enforces Range Access Statute in Pathbreaking Case

It has happened before in Massachusetts: A small, hardy band of armed Americans faces off against elements of the most powerful military in the world and commits a revolutionary act that paves the way for ...

DOJ Drops Controversial NFA Charge Against Pardoned Jan. 6 Protestor

News  

Monday, April 21, 2025

DOJ Drops Controversial NFA Charge Against Pardoned Jan. 6 Protestor

Last February, NRA-ILA’s reporting exposed the case of Taylor Taranto, a pardoned January 6 protestor separately arrested on firearm charges in Washington, D.C. 

Trump Administration Revives Federal Firearm Rights Restoration Provision

News  

Friday, March 21, 2025

Trump Administration Revives Federal Firearm Rights Restoration Provision

On March 20, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) published an interim final rule entitled, Withdrawing the Attorney General’s Delegation of Authority. That bland title belies the historic nature of the measure, which is aimed at reviving ...

Germany Strips “Extremist” AfD Members, Supporters of Gun Licenses, Guns

News  

Monday, April 14, 2025

Germany Strips “Extremist” AfD Members, Supporters of Gun Licenses, Guns

It’s been only a few years since the San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed a resolution calling the NRA a “domestic terrorist organization.” 

Canadian Appeals Court Upholds 2020 Gun Bans – “Reasonable” and “Rationally Connected to a Legitimate Objective”

News  

Monday, April 21, 2025

Canadian Appeals Court Upholds 2020 Gun Bans – “Reasonable” and “Rationally Connected to a Legitimate Objective”

On March 9, when Mark Carney was selected to replace Justin Trudeau as Canada’s Prime Minister and the new Liberal Party leader, he ignored the opportunity the situation presented to jettison his predecessor’s useless and expensive “assault-style ...

Trump DOJ Creates Second Amendment Task Force to Undo Damage of Biden Era

News  

Monday, April 14, 2025

Trump DOJ Creates Second Amendment Task Force to Undo Damage of Biden Era

Last week, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) formally announced the creation of a Second Amendment Task Force with Attorney General Pam Bondi declaring, “It is the policy of the Department of Justice to use its full ...

Vermont: Committee Approves Burlington Gun Ban

Monday, April 21, 2025

Vermont: Committee Approves Burlington Gun Ban

On Friday, April 18, the Vermont Senate Government Operations Committee approved S. 131, a change to the Burlington City Charter that would allow the city to ban firearms in establishments that serve alcohol.

Legal Update: April 2025 Litigation Update

Monday, April 21, 2025

Legal Update: April 2025 Litigation Update

In the first quarter of 2025, the National Rifle Association filed three new lawsuits and five amicus briefs, while continuing to litigate dozens of ongoing lawsuits across the country.

Washington: Permit to Purchase Bill Passes Senate

Tuesday, April 15, 2025

Washington: Permit to Purchase Bill Passes Senate

On Monday, April 14th, the Senate passed House Bill 1163, the permit-to-purchase scheme, along party lines. It will now return to the House for concurrence with amendments made in the Senate. NRA members must urge ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.