Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

Zeroed Out: Trump Administration Formally Ends Biden-Era War on Gun Dealers

Tuesday, April 8, 2025

Zeroed Out: Trump Administration Formally Ends Biden-Era War on Gun Dealers

On April 7, the Trump Administration formally revoked the Biden-Harris Administration’s “zero tolerance” policy for inspections of federal firearm licensees (FFLs). The edict ended a bureaucratic reign of terror that was costing small business people their livelihoods over harmless clerical errors in the voluminous paperwork that accompanies regulated gun sales. Also announced were a review of two anti-gun administrative rules from the prior administration, one on the status of braced pistols under the NFA and another on who is required to become an FFL to sell guns. These moves continue the rollback of anti-gun policies perpetrated under Biden-Harris and signal a significant, pro-gun shift by the Trump Administration.

We have extensively reported on the Trump administration’s early pro-gun moves, including here, here, here, here, here, and here. All these actions followed a Feb. 7 Executive Order by the President entitled “Protecting Second Amendment Rights.” The president directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to review several categories of actions by the prior administration to “assess any ongoing infringements of the Second Amendment rights of our citizens.” She was then supposed to report back to the White House with a “proposed plan of action to … protect the Second Amendment rights of all Americans.” While that report has not been made public to date, it’s clear the Trump White House has wasted no time translating the recommendations into actions.

Zero Tolerance was among the most infamous Biden-era tactics against a gun industry he had publicly declared “the enemy” during a televised debate. The policy supposedly targeted “willful” violations of a specified list of infractions, including transferring a firearm to a prohibited person; failing to conduct a required background check; falsifying records, such as a firearms transaction form; failing to respond to a trace request; and refusing to permit ATF to conduct an inspection. A single such violation would, under the policy, presumably result in revocation of the FFL’s license.

While those violations, on their face, seem rather serious, and while “willfulness” is supposed to put the government to a high burden of proof, that is not how the policy worked in practice. Falsifying records, for example, could translate simply to making a mistake in any of the dozens of inputs necessary to complete an ATF Form 4473, the document used when a firearm is sold from a dealer to an unlicensed person.

Failure to conduct a required background check, moreover, didn’t necessarily mean FFLs were selling guns out of the back door without paperwork, but could include a situation where there was legitimate confusion over the rules. For example, federal law specifies that certain firearm-related permits, including some carry licenses, provide an alternative to the background check normally required. There can also be misunderstandings over when an FFL is required to run a background check when returning a gun to its owner after storage, consignment, or repair.

The government’s required showing of “willfulness” is supposed to prevent exploiting innocent mistakes by FFLs acting in good faith from being used against them. But under the Biden-Harris Zero Tolerance policy, ATF turned this doctrine on its head by claiming the specified “zero tolerance” violations inherently demonstrated willfulness. 

By all accounts, the policy represented, in the words of anti-gun propaganda site The Trace,  a “crackdown that triggered the steepest increase in gun store license revocations in [ATF’s] history.”

An announcement published on April 7 by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives quoted Attorney General Pam Bondi as saying:  “The prior administration’s ‘Zero Tolerance’ policy unfairly targeted law-abiding gun owners and created an undue burden on Americans seeking to exercise their constitutional right to bear arms – it ends today.”

This presumably means ATF will return to its prior practice of conducting inspections in a more wholistic manner that considers the facts and circumstances of each case and allows for remedial measures to be taken where the FFL was operating in good faith.

The April 7 announcement also noted that DOJ and ATF have plans to revisit the regulatory framework surrounding stabilizing braces (Final Rule 2021R-08F) and the definition of “engaged in the business” of firearms dealing (Final Rule 2022R-17F).

NRA-ILA had opposed both of these rules as exceeding ATF’s statutory authority, creating confusion, and causing legal traps for law-abiding gun owners. 

The announcement continued: “The DOJ and ATF will conduct an in-depth review over the coming months and will engage in consultations with stakeholders, including gun rights organizations, industry leaders and legal experts. Further updates on the status of these reviews will be released in due course.”

ATF Acting Director Kash Patel stated: “Today’s repeal of the Zero Tolerance Policy and the comprehensive review of stabilizing brace regulations and the definition of ‘engaged in the business’ marks a pivotal step toward restoring fairness and clarity in firearms regulation,” He also noted ATF’s commitment “to working with all stakeholders to ensure our policies are balanced, constitutional and protective of Americans’ Second Amendment rights.”

NRA-ILA commends the administration for these significant steps and looks forward to participating in the review process. Happier days for gun owners and the industries that serve them appear to lie ahead.  

TRENDING NOW
Baltimore Gets Serious on Crime Control, and the Results Speak for Themselves

News  

Monday, July 14, 2025

Baltimore Gets Serious on Crime Control, and the Results Speak for Themselves

As the mid-year mark of 2025 hits, a promising report on crime trends has come out of the City of Baltimore. Surprising news at first glance until you dig deeper into the policy direction the ...

U.K. Moves to Legally De-suppress Suppressors

News  

Monday, July 14, 2025

U.K. Moves to Legally De-suppress Suppressors

On July 4th, President Donald Trump signed into law his “One Big Beautiful Bill,” which included a provision that eliminated the tax stamp fee of $200, but did not deregulate suppressors under the National Firearms ...

President Trump Supports Hunting and Resource Protection with Executive Actions

News  

Monday, July 14, 2025

President Trump Supports Hunting and Resource Protection with Executive Actions

Just as the United States was preparing to celebrate 249 beautiful years, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order on July 3rd establishing the “Make America Beautiful Again" Commission supporting hunters, outdoorsmen, and outdoor recreationists by prioritizing the ...

Legacy Media Finally Acknowledges Politization of Public Health

News  

Monday, July 14, 2025

Legacy Media Finally Acknowledges Politization of Public Health

It appears the editors of The Atlantic are finally willing to entertain an idea that has long been obvious to gun rights supporters.

House Annual Appropriations Process Update

News  

Monday, July 14, 2025

House Annual Appropriations Process Update

As the House Appropriations Committee is putting together legislation to fund the government, NRA-ILA has worked closely with policy makers to ensure several long-standing priorities for gun owners were included in the underlying bills.

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

News  

Second Amendment  

Thursday, May 22, 2025

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

Earlier today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R.1 the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which included Section 2 of the Hearing Protection Act, completely removing suppressors from the National Firearms Act (NFA).

DOJ Declines to Seek Supreme Court Review of Decision Striking Down Federal Laws Prohibiting FFLs From Selling Handguns to 18-to-20-Year-Olds

Thursday, July 10, 2025

DOJ Declines to Seek Supreme Court Review of Decision Striking Down Federal Laws Prohibiting FFLs From Selling Handguns to 18-to-20-Year-Olds

In Reese v. ATF, the Fifth Circuit held that 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(b)(1) and (c)(1)—which together forbid Federal Firearms Licensees from selling handguns to 18-to-20-year-olds—violate the Second Amendment.

Florida: Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday Signed by Governor

Monday, July 7, 2025

Florida: Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday Signed by Governor

Governor Ron DeSantis recently signed the Florida Budget for Fiscal Year 2025–2026, which includes a Second Amendment sales tax holiday from September 8 through December 31, 2025. The NRA is thankful for Governor DeSantis’ strong ...

NRA-ILA July 2025 Litigation Update

Thursday, July 10, 2025

NRA-ILA July 2025 Litigation Update

In the second quarter of 2025, the National Rifle Association filed two cert petitions in the U.S. Supreme Court and five amicus briefs, while continuing to litigate dozens of ongoing lawsuits across the country.

Maine: Lawmakers Call for Anti-2A Progressive Professor to Be Fired

Tuesday, July 8, 2025

Maine: Lawmakers Call for Anti-2A Progressive Professor to Be Fired

In case you missed the media firestorm last week, a progressive professor at Eastern Maine Community College in Bangor, Maine, has come under fire for her emails belittling a student for her religious beliefs and views ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.