Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

ATF Updates “Brady Permit Chart,” Reduces Need for Redundant NICS Checks

Monday, June 2, 2025

ATF Updates “Brady Permit Chart,” Reduces Need for Redundant NICS Checks

We have been reporting on recent reforms by ATF to make its operations more transparent, professional, and public safety focused and less openly hostile to law abiding gun owners and the industries that serve them. Continuing this trend was the May 23 announcement of revisions to the so-called Brady Permit Chart, which illustrates which firearm-related credentials ATF considers an acceptable alternative to a NICS check for firearm transfers. By our count, there was a net pick-up of three jurisdictions issuing credentials that qualify for this important exception.

A closer look at the chart, moreover, reveals contradictions that undercut anti-gun states’ complaints about how they would be forced to accept the laxer permitting standards of pro-gun jurisdictions, should H.R. 38 or other national reciprocity legislation become law. Indeed, virtually none of the most anti-gun states issue qualifying permits, indicating that it’s actually those states whose permitting standards deserve closer scrutiny.

In general, there is a requirement under federal law that a Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL) run a NICS inquiry any time the FFL transfers a firearm to an unlicensed individual. This requirement does not apply, however, if the transferee presents the FFL with:

a license or permit that …allows such other person to possess or acquire a firearm; … was issued not more than 5 years earlier by the State in which the transfer is to take place; and … the law of the State provides that such a permit is to be issued only after an authorized government official has verified that the information available to such official does not indicate that possession of a firearm by such other person would be in violation of law.

This reflects the commonsense judgement that a person responsible enough to obtain, for example, a concealed carry permit that includes a NICS check should be relieved of the burden of undergoing additional checks when obtaining a firearm within the next five years. Evidence backs this up, as concealed carry permit holders, as a population, have consistently proven themselves to be more law-abiding than the general population.

Yet, as NRA-ILA pointed out in its memorandum to Attorney General Pam Bondi on implementing President Trump’s Executive Order Protecting Second Amendment Rights, ATF had not been complying with the letter or spirit of the NICS Exemption provision:

Almost every state issues concealed carry permits that could potentially qualify for this exemption. Yet ATF’s determinations about which permits do or do not qualify are inconsistent, opaque, and often rely on criteria not explicitly mentioned in the statutory language. This defeats the congressional intent of the license exception. ATF should be required to publish its criteria and to use only the statutory language to guide its decisions. It should also conduct a review of all state concealed carry or other firearm-related licenses or permits to determine if they meet the statutory language.

With its update, ATF appears to have taken NRA-ILA’s feedback seriously. In addition to reviewing the prior list, ATF published an open letter explaining its process for determining which permits qualify. According to that letter:

the laws of the state must provide that the authority issuing the permit is required to check available information, including conducting a NICS background check, and that the issuing authority may not issue a permit to anyone when the available information indicates the applicant is prohibited from possessing firearms under federal, state, or local law.

It also clarified that permits valid for a period of greater than five years can still qualify, so long as no more than five years have expired since the date the permit was issued or renewed. ATF’s latest chart helpfully includes notes on what it considers the deficiencies in the states that do not qualify.

In total, 28 states and Puerto Rico issue qualifying credentials; in almost every case these are concealed carry licenses. By ATF’s standards, this means that the states are running NICS checks before issuance or renewal and that they do not issue permits to individuals prohibited by law.

Ironically, almost all of America’s most stridently anti-gun states and territories do not meet these relatively modest standards, including California, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York. Yet it is these states that typically protest the loudest about other states’ permitting practices.

Some of these anti-gun states disallow NICS exempt transactions by statute, leading one to wonder if they trust the credentials issued under their own laws. Other of these states failed ATF’s review because officials are empowered in some cases to issue permits to individual who are prohibited under federal law.

Prior “may-issue” states have a long tradition of issuing concealed carry permits as a form of status symbol, regardless of public safety considerations. Indeed, there have been repeated federal corruption cases against licensing officials in New York City, who among other things have been convicted of accepting bribes to issue concealed carry licenses to applicants with violent criminal histories. Meanwhile, “ordinary,” law-abiding citizens who could not distinguish their “need” for a permit from the general public were disqualified.

Theoretically, that ended with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022), in which the U.S. Supreme Court invalided New York’s may-issue licensing scheme under the Second Amendment. Yet New York and other may-issue jurisdictions responded to that decision by removing the licensing official’s discretion on the applicant’s “need” for a permit in favor of his or her “suitability” to receive one.

Thus, applicants are subject to unconstitutional requirements like character references, personal interviews, and intrusive and prolonged investigation of their personal lives. In Los Angeles, this process has resulted in delays of over a year in applicants’ receiving a decision on their permits. The situation is so egregious that DOJ’s Civil Rights Division has opened an investigation to determine if the Los Angeles County Sheriff is violating applicants’ Second Amendment rights.

Yet even someone who passes this gauntlet can’t take advantage of the NICS exemption in California. Perhaps this is because the California legislature knows as well as anyone that the point of the process isn’t to determine who is a public safety risk but merely to discourage as many people as possible from even applying in the first place.

Fortunately, Americans now have more opportunities than ever to bypass NICS checks when acquiring firearms at retail, freeing up time for themselves and the busy FFLs that serve them and lowering barriers to the exercise of their rights. 

TRENDING NOW
U.S. Court of Appeals Backtracks on Adverse Suppressor Ruling

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

U.S. Court of Appeals Backtracks on Adverse Suppressor Ruling

In a single sentence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit added to the high-profile and consequential national conversation on firearm suppressors.

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

News  

Second Amendment  

Thursday, May 22, 2025

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

Earlier today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R.1 the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which included Section 2 of the Hearing Protection Act, completely removing suppressors from the National Firearms Act (NFA).

2A News Out of New Jersey You Won’t Believe: It’s Actually a Good Thing!

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

2A News Out of New Jersey You Won’t Believe: It’s Actually a Good Thing!

The Garden State is not where most seek positive developments regarding our right to arms, so we were pleasantly surprised when Englishtown, N.J., recently made a move to support the Second Amendment.

Switched Off: A Case Study on Minnesota’s Illegal Machine Gun Law

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

Switched Off: A Case Study on Minnesota’s Illegal Machine Gun Law

There’s been a lot of noise of late about auto sears or so-called “Glock switches” – devices to convert a semiautomatic firearm into an automatic weapon. 

Update: Washington Post Fact Checks Misleading Ad Council “Children” and Firearms Talking Point

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

Update: Washington Post Fact Checks Misleading Ad Council “Children” and Firearms Talking Point

Last week, NRA-ILA explained how a recent public service announcement campaign from the federally-funded Ad Council, and the gun control lobby more broadly, manipulates statistics to create misleading talking points about “children” and firearms.

Minnesota: Shotgun-Only Hunting Zones Repealed

Friday, June 20, 2025

Minnesota: Shotgun-Only Hunting Zones Repealed

On Monday, June 9th, outside of regular session, the Senate passed the Environment Omnibus bill, removing shotgun-only hunting zones in the state. 

DOJ Files Amicus Brief Supporting NRA-Backed Challenge to IL’s Ban on “Assault Weapons” and “Large-Capacity Magazines”

Tuesday, June 17, 2025

DOJ Files Amicus Brief Supporting NRA-Backed Challenge to IL’s Ban on “Assault Weapons” and “Large-Capacity Magazines”

Last Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice filed an amicus brief in the Seventh Circuit supporting an NRA-backed challenge to Illinois’s prohibition on so-called “assault weapons” and “large-capacity magazines.”

Ninth Circuit Strikes Down CA’s One-Gun-A-Month Law

Friday, June 20, 2025

Ninth Circuit Strikes Down CA’s One-Gun-A-Month Law

Today, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that California’s law prohibiting people from buying more than one firearm in a 30-day period violates the Second Amendment.

North Carolina: Update on Gun Bills Moving through the General Assembly

Tuesday, June 24, 2025

North Carolina: Update on Gun Bills Moving through the General Assembly

Recently, House Bill 193 (H193) was reported favorably out of both the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Rules Committee, with amendments.

The Trace Marks a Birthday: Ten Years of Anti-gun Propaganda, Little to Show for It

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

The Trace Marks a Birthday: Ten Years of Anti-gun Propaganda, Little to Show for It

On June 18, the anti-gun propaganda mill The Trace celebrated its tenth birthday with a self-congratulatory article entitled “How The Trace Came to Be and Other Stories From Our Early Days.” 

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.