Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Agenda-Pushing Senator Frank Lautenberg Mischaracterizes Congressional Research Service Memo

Thursday, May 22, 2003

On May 20, 2003, Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) made public a confidential memorandum prepared at his request, by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). He now mischaracterizes both his purpose in soliciting the memo and the information the memo contains.

The memo is titled, "Foreign Terrorists and the Availability of Firearms and Black Powder in the United States." While one might infer from the title that it provides a general assessment of issues related to that topic, such is not the case. The memo`s first sentence explains:

"As requested, this memorandum addresses the 28 specific questions you (Lautenberg) asked regarding the possible acquisition of firearms and black powder by foreign terrorists in the United States." (Emphasis in the original.)

Lautenberg has not made his 28 questions public. It appears, though, that they were tailored not to obtain information for his education, but to obtain answers to use in pushing an anti-gun bill he already had introduced. The sequence of relevant events is instructive. On May 20, Lautenberg said, "I have a bill, S. 969, the Homeland Security Gun Safety Act, that will address many of these problems" he claimed CRS identified. The memo was provided to the senator on May 16, but he had already introduced his bill on May 1st.

  • S. 969 proposes to delay some gun purchases whenever the Homeland Security threat level is raised, even though it has never been raised out of concern that terrorists might be planning to buy guns. It also proposes to impose a 30-day waiting period between purchases of handguns. It is passing strange that anyone would try to make it harder for Americans to buy guns for defense when the terrorism threat increases.
  • Lautenberg says that CRS "paints a chilling picture about how easy it is for terrorists to acquire weapons within our borders." CRS said no such thing, and it did not recommend new gun laws.
  • CRS noted that numerous laws prohibit terrorists and criminals from possessing firearms, that foreign terrorists are additionally restricted by laws that affect only non-citizens, and that any terrorist trying to export a gun (as theorized by anti-gun groups) would have to overcome additional legal hurdles.
  • CRS noted that to thwart a terrorist who might try to buy a gun, efforts are underway "to provide limited terrorist lookout records to the FBI to be downloaded into the National Criminal Information Center."
  • CRS cited Bureau of Justice Statistics data showing that "assault weapons" are rarely used in crime. It did not note any instance in which a .50 caliber rifle has been used to commit a violent crime.
  • CRS indirectly noted the futility of gun laws, by pointing out that terrorists and common criminals can buy guns by using easily acquired false identification documents, or through illegal channels.
  • Conspicuous for its absence in the CRS memo was any information indicating that terrorists are currently buying guns, or indicating the extent to which any have done so previously.
IN THIS ARTICLE
Handguns
TRENDING NOW
U.S. Department of Justice Declares Age 18-20 Handgun Sales Ban Unconstitutional

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

U.S. Department of Justice Declares Age 18-20 Handgun Sales Ban Unconstitutional

On September 17, the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) issued a memorandum opinion to answer the question “whether restricting young adults from buying firearms comports with the Second Amendment as the Supreme ...

“Law abiding citizens with an AR-15 are not a threat to anyone” — Law Enforcement Groups Weigh in on Supreme Court “Assault Weapons” Cases

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

“Law abiding citizens with an AR-15 are not a threat to anyone” — Law Enforcement Groups Weigh in on Supreme Court “Assault Weapons” Cases

The Trace, the “newsroom” funded by anti-gun extremist Michael Bloomberg, reported in June on the extent to which the NRA-backed NYSRPA v. Bruen case has, to date, rebuilt the modern Second Amendment landscape.

Trump DOJ Sues San Jose, Ca., Over $1,600 Concealed Carry Licensing Fee

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Trump DOJ Sues San Jose, Ca., Over $1,600 Concealed Carry Licensing Fee

Do you know the way to San Jose? Dionne Warwick famously asked in her 1968 hit song. Well, Assistant U.S. Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon certainly does, and she recently made sure the city was served ...

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

In another major victory for the National Rifle Association and law-abiding gun owners, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas today held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for ...

Everytown Goes Hunting for Credibility

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Everytown Goes Hunting for Credibility

The irony is nothing short of comedy. Multiple outlets are having a field day with the Michael Bloomberg-backed Everytown organization, which has spent years and millions of dollars supporting extreme restrictions on lawful gun ownership, ...

The Fight to Protect the Firearms Industry Continues

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

The Fight to Protect the Firearms Industry Continues

The political lawfare campaign to dismantle the lawful firearms industry by holding it liable for the criminal misuse of its constitutionally protected products should have never started. U.S. tort law has long held that a ...

Study Suggests “Safe Storage” Mandates are Ineffective

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Study Suggests “Safe Storage” Mandates are Ineffective

While it likely comes as no surprise to most readers, a recent study suggests that government-mandates that law-abiding gun owners always secure their firearms when “not in use”—usually unloaded, separate from ammunition, and either in ...

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

News  

Monday, August 17, 2026

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

On August 12, we reported on an important development in the ongoing litigation over the National Firearms Act (NFA) filed by multiple plaintiffs in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. These included, ...

Redditors Embarrass Virginia Assembly’s Chief Gun Banner

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Redditors Embarrass Virginia Assembly’s Chief Gun Banner

In late August, Virginia State Delegate Dan Helmer (D-10), who represents a portion of the Northern Virginia D.C. suburb of Fairfax County, took to Reddit for an “ask me anything” (AMA) question and answer session.

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS to Hear Challenge to Maine’s 72-Hour Waiting Period Law

Thursday, September 24, 2026

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS to Hear Challenge to Maine’s 72-Hour Waiting Period Law

The National Rifle Association and Second Amendment Foundation filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to grant review in Beckwith v. Frey, a challenge to Maine’s 72-hour waiting period requirement for firearm purchases.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.