Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

South Carolina General Assembly Attacking Your Political Voice!

Friday, February 8, 2008

The South Carolina General Assembly is in full swing, and this week, the Senate worked on S 714, which could adversely impact NRA's ability to lobby South Carolina legislators on issues relating to our Right to Keep and Bear Arms, hunting, and many other matters. 

Last week, NRA sent a letter of opposition to Senators, urging them to oppose S 714.  At that time, the Senate amended the bill to remove the problematic language.  Unfortunately, the Senate reversed course this week, and reinserted the objectionable provisions.  The sections of S 714 that have caused NRA concern deal with identifying and defining "political awareness organizations," and regulations that seek to control them.  Under the new definition, NRA would be identified as a "political awareness organization," and subject to all reporting requirements.  Those requirements?  NRA would be forced to report to the State of South Carolina all contributions in excess of $100 from individuals.  This reporting requirement would include the name and address of each contributor.  

What is not clear, however, is to what extent this legislation would impact a national organization like NRA.  The vast majority of contributions to NRA originate from outside of South Carolina.  Furthermore, people contribute to NRA for any number of reasons, most of which have nothing to do with influencing legislative policy in South Carolina.  It is unclear how NRA would be required to comply with the reporting requirements of S 714.  This confusion aside, the underlying intent of S 714 is clear.  It is an attempt to regulate, and indirectly restrict, free speech.  This is blatantly unconstitutional.  While federal courts, including the Supreme Court of the United States, have held that some regulations are acceptable when it comes to political speech (e.g., limitations on contributions to political campaigns), true issue advocacy has not been held to be subject to these types of restrictions. 

The right to speak freely and publicly on the wisdom of legislation and government policies is at the very core of democracy and of the right protected by the First Amendment.  S 714 is clearly an attempt to infringe on that right.  Not only does it infringe on the right to free speech, but the reporting requirement is a clear invasion of the privacy of those who wish to contribute to NRA.  Not wanting to be put on a government list, NRA contributors could choose to simply no longer contribute, which would greatly diminish NRA's ability to speak on behalf of its members on policy issues of concern to them. This could have a ripple effect that reaches far beyond the borders of South Carolina. 

S 714 must be defeated.  Please contact your Senator and urge him to oppose S 714.  You can find all the necessary contact information by clicking here.

TRENDING NOW
Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

In another major victory for the National Rifle Association and law-abiding gun owners, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas today held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for ...

M14s Added to CMP Roster

News  

Monday, August 3, 2026

M14s Added to CMP Roster

Since 1903, the Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP) has served a critical role in promoting America’s continued excellence in marksmanship and firearms safety by providing firearms education, training, and competitions nationwide

NRA Submits Comments on Several ATF Rulemakings; the Deadline for Your Input is Aug. 4!

News  

Monday, August 3, 2026

NRA Submits Comments on Several ATF Rulemakings; the Deadline for Your Input is Aug. 4!

This week, NRA submitted comments on several important ATF rulemakings.

Oregon’s Anti-Hunting Initiative Fails to Meet Signature Threshold

News  

Monday, August 3, 2026

Oregon’s Anti-Hunting Initiative Fails to Meet Signature Threshold

Recently, we alerted our members about an extreme ballot initiative in Oregon, which had the potential to put an end to not just hunting, fishing, and trapping, but traditional ranching and farming practices as well.

Punishing Imagination and Childish Impulses Won’t Keep Schools Safe

News  

Monday, August 3, 2026

Punishing Imagination and Childish Impulses Won’t Keep Schools Safe

As the calendar turns to August, many parents are starting the annual check of school supply lists, bus routes, and lunch packing routines.  

Supplemental Brief Filed in NRA-Supported Duncan v. Bonta Highlights Circuit Split Created by NRA’s Victory in ANJRPC v. Attorney General of New Jersey

Friday, August 7, 2026

Supplemental Brief Filed in NRA-Supported Duncan v. Bonta Highlights Circuit Split Created by NRA’s Victory in ANJRPC v. Attorney General of New Jersey

The Petitioners in Duncan v. Bonta, an NRA-supported challenge to California’s ban on magazines capable of holding more than ten rounds, have filed a Supplemental Brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to grant review and ...

New Jersey: Third Circuit Grants Stay in AWB/Mag Ban Case

Tuesday, August 4, 2026

New Jersey: Third Circuit Grants Stay in AWB/Mag Ban Case

Today, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted the state's request for a stay pending its appeal to the US Supreme Court.

Court Stays NRA Challenge to Virginia’s “Assault Firearm” and Magazine Bans, Keeping Statewide Injunction in Place Until Supreme Court Rules on “Assault Weapon” Bans

Wednesday, July 29, 2026

Court Stays NRA Challenge to Virginia’s “Assault Firearm” and Magazine Bans, Keeping Statewide Injunction in Place Until Supreme Court Rules on “Assault Weapon” Bans

In the NRA’s challenge to Virginia’s “assault firearm” and magazine bans, Santolla v. Katz, the court today entered an order memorializing the parties’ agreement to stay the case until after the U.S. Supreme Court issues ...

DOJ Withdraws Appeal in Challenge to Post Office Firearms Ban

News  

Monday, July 27, 2026

DOJ Withdraws Appeal in Challenge to Post Office Firearms Ban

Another significant victory has emerged in the ongoing effort to roll back unconstitutional restrictions on the right to bear arms in places that millions of law-abiding Americans visit every day in every state in towns ...

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging Indiana Supreme Court to Protect Associational Standing

Tuesday, July 28, 2026

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging Indiana Supreme Court to Protect Associational Standing

The National Rifle Association joined a coalition of 23 nonprofit organizations, led by the ACLU of Indiana, in filing an amicus brief urging the Indiana Supreme Court to recognize the doctrine of associational standing. 

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.