Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Massachusetts: Committee to Hear Ivory Ban Bills

Friday, September 29, 2017

Massachusetts: Committee to Hear Ivory Ban Bills

On Tuesday October 3, the Joint Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture will have a hearing on bills to enact a New York-style ivory ban that is more severe than the federal ivory ban.  Please consider attending the hearing to voice opposition to SB 450 and HB 419.  In addition, please contact members of the Joint Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture and urge them to oppose these bills!  Click the “Take Action” button below to contact committee members.

Senate Bill 450, sponsored by Senator Jason Lewis (D), prohibits the sale, offer of sale, purchase, or possession with intent to sell, any ivory or rhinoceros horn with limited exceptions.  Under this legislation, a first offense for purchasing and selling ivory or ivory products is a possible fine of up to $4,000 or an amount equal to two times the total value of the ivory, ivory products, rhinoceros horn, and rhinoceros horn products involved in the offense, whichever is greater, and possible imprisonment for up to 6 months in a house of correction.  For a second offense, a person shall be fined no less than $8,000 or an amount equal to two times the total value of the ivory, ivory products, rhinoceros horn, and rhinoceros horn products involved in the offense, whichever is greater, and may be imprisoned for up to 18 months in a house of correction.  For continued offenses or for any offense where the value the trafficked ivory and/or rhino horn and other trafficked items combined equals $25,000, a person may be imprisoned for up to two and a half years in a house of correction and fined no less than an amount equal to $40,000 or an amount equal to two times the total value of the ivory, ivory products, rhinoceros horn and rhinoceros horn products involved in the offense, whichever is greater.

House Bill 419, sponsored by Representative Lori Ehrlich (D -8) and Senator Jason Lewis (D) also prohibits the sale, offer for sale, purchase, or possessing with the intent to sell of any ivory or rhinoceros horn with limited exceptions.  The punishments for offenses are equivalent to SB 450.

American collectors, hunters, and recreational shooters have legally purchased firearms that have incorporated ivory features for decades.  These include some of America’s most historically-significant and collectible guns.  This proposed ivory ban would create strict and unnecessary restrictions that wouldn’t prevent the poaching of elephants, but will instead hurt law-abiding Massachusetts citizens who have legally acquired ivory products.  For example, it would become illegal for firearm collectors to buy and sell many firearms containing decorative ivory inlays, bead sights and/or ivory grips.  The exceptions for buying and selling antique products and other valuable collectibles containing ivory are limited.  Antiques containing ivory must be over a hundred years old, leaving the owner with the burden of proof to document the age of antiques in his possession. 

These bills would do nothing to promote its purported goal of addressing poaching and the illegal ivory trade; however, it would impose unfair restrictions on law-abiding gun owners and sportsmen.

Once again, please consider attending the hearing to voice opposition to this measure and please contact members of the House Judiciary Committee and urge them to oppose SB 450 and HB 419. Details of the hearing may be found below.

October 3 from 1PM-5PM
Room B1
24 Beacon St.
Boston, MA 02133

TRENDING NOW
U.S. Department of Justice Declares Age 18-20 Handgun Sales Ban Unconstitutional

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

U.S. Department of Justice Declares Age 18-20 Handgun Sales Ban Unconstitutional

On September 17, the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) issued a memorandum opinion to answer the question “whether restricting young adults from buying firearms comports with the Second Amendment as the Supreme ...

“Law abiding citizens with an AR-15 are not a threat to anyone” — Law Enforcement Groups Weigh in on Supreme Court “Assault Weapons” Cases

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

“Law abiding citizens with an AR-15 are not a threat to anyone” — Law Enforcement Groups Weigh in on Supreme Court “Assault Weapons” Cases

The Trace, the “newsroom” funded by anti-gun extremist Michael Bloomberg, reported in June on the extent to which the NRA-backed NYSRPA v. Bruen case has, to date, rebuilt the modern Second Amendment landscape.

Trump DOJ Sues San Jose, Ca., Over $1,600 Concealed Carry Licensing Fee

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Trump DOJ Sues San Jose, Ca., Over $1,600 Concealed Carry Licensing Fee

Do you know the way to San Jose? Dionne Warwick famously asked in her 1968 hit song. Well, Assistant U.S. Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon certainly does, and she recently made sure the city was served ...

Everytown Goes Hunting for Credibility

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Everytown Goes Hunting for Credibility

The irony is nothing short of comedy. Multiple outlets are having a field day with the Michael Bloomberg-backed Everytown organization, which has spent years and millions of dollars supporting extreme restrictions on lawful gun ownership, ...

Study Suggests “Safe Storage” Mandates are Ineffective

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Study Suggests “Safe Storage” Mandates are Ineffective

While it likely comes as no surprise to most readers, a recent study suggests that government-mandates that law-abiding gun owners always secure their firearms when “not in use”—usually unloaded, separate from ammunition, and either in ...

Jive Turkeys: Everytown Gears Up to Spoil Thanksgiving with Gobbledygook

News  

Monday, November 17, 2025

Jive Turkeys: Everytown Gears Up to Spoil Thanksgiving with Gobbledygook

Thanksgiving in America isn’t just about food, family and football. According to a survey published by casino.ca (with its Great Thanksgiving Family Feud Map), the holiday typically “comes with a slice of family chaos and a touch of ...

The Fight to Protect the Firearms Industry Continues

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

The Fight to Protect the Firearms Industry Continues

The political lawfare campaign to dismantle the lawful firearms industry by holding it liable for the criminal misuse of its constitutionally protected products should have never started. U.S. tort law has long held that a ...

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

In another major victory for the National Rifle Association and law-abiding gun owners, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas today held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for ...

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

News  

Monday, August 17, 2026

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

On August 12, we reported on an important development in the ongoing litigation over the National Firearms Act (NFA) filed by multiple plaintiffs in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. These included, ...

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS to Hear Challenge to Maine’s 72-Hour Waiting Period Law

Thursday, September 24, 2026

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS to Hear Challenge to Maine’s 72-Hour Waiting Period Law

The National Rifle Association and Second Amendment Foundation filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to grant review in Beckwith v. Frey, a challenge to Maine’s 72-hour waiting period requirement for firearm purchases.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.