Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Massachusetts: Committee to Hear Ivory Ban Bills

Friday, September 29, 2017

Massachusetts: Committee to Hear Ivory Ban Bills

On Tuesday October 3, the Joint Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture will have a hearing on bills to enact a New York-style ivory ban that is more severe than the federal ivory ban.  Please consider attending the hearing to voice opposition to SB 450 and HB 419.  In addition, please contact members of the Joint Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture and urge them to oppose these bills!  Click the “Take Action” button below to contact committee members.

Senate Bill 450, sponsored by Senator Jason Lewis (D), prohibits the sale, offer of sale, purchase, or possession with intent to sell, any ivory or rhinoceros horn with limited exceptions.  Under this legislation, a first offense for purchasing and selling ivory or ivory products is a possible fine of up to $4,000 or an amount equal to two times the total value of the ivory, ivory products, rhinoceros horn, and rhinoceros horn products involved in the offense, whichever is greater, and possible imprisonment for up to 6 months in a house of correction.  For a second offense, a person shall be fined no less than $8,000 or an amount equal to two times the total value of the ivory, ivory products, rhinoceros horn, and rhinoceros horn products involved in the offense, whichever is greater, and may be imprisoned for up to 18 months in a house of correction.  For continued offenses or for any offense where the value the trafficked ivory and/or rhino horn and other trafficked items combined equals $25,000, a person may be imprisoned for up to two and a half years in a house of correction and fined no less than an amount equal to $40,000 or an amount equal to two times the total value of the ivory, ivory products, rhinoceros horn and rhinoceros horn products involved in the offense, whichever is greater.

House Bill 419, sponsored by Representative Lori Ehrlich (D -8) and Senator Jason Lewis (D) also prohibits the sale, offer for sale, purchase, or possessing with the intent to sell of any ivory or rhinoceros horn with limited exceptions.  The punishments for offenses are equivalent to SB 450.

American collectors, hunters, and recreational shooters have legally purchased firearms that have incorporated ivory features for decades.  These include some of America’s most historically-significant and collectible guns.  This proposed ivory ban would create strict and unnecessary restrictions that wouldn’t prevent the poaching of elephants, but will instead hurt law-abiding Massachusetts citizens who have legally acquired ivory products.  For example, it would become illegal for firearm collectors to buy and sell many firearms containing decorative ivory inlays, bead sights and/or ivory grips.  The exceptions for buying and selling antique products and other valuable collectibles containing ivory are limited.  Antiques containing ivory must be over a hundred years old, leaving the owner with the burden of proof to document the age of antiques in his possession. 

These bills would do nothing to promote its purported goal of addressing poaching and the illegal ivory trade; however, it would impose unfair restrictions on law-abiding gun owners and sportsmen.

Once again, please consider attending the hearing to voice opposition to this measure and please contact members of the House Judiciary Committee and urge them to oppose SB 450 and HB 419. Details of the hearing may be found below.

October 3 from 1PM-5PM
Room B1
24 Beacon St.
Boston, MA 02133

TRENDING NOW
Pro-2A Journalist Awarded in New Jersey: Further Proof the Garden State is Savable?

News  

Monday, January 5, 2026

Pro-2A Journalist Awarded in New Jersey: Further Proof the Garden State is Savable?

It’s rare to see journalists write accurate articles about the Second Amendment and the right to self-defense, and even more rare to see them receive accolades from their mainstream peers for such articles.  

Ninth Circuit Panel Rules California’s Open Carry Ban is Unconstitutional

Monday, January 5, 2026

Ninth Circuit Panel Rules California’s Open Carry Ban is Unconstitutional

On Friday, Jan. 3, a divided three judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that California’s ban on open carry in counties with a population of greater than 200,000 ...

More Anti-Gun “Trajectories” and “Experiments” on the Horizon in Illinois for 2026

News  

Monday, January 5, 2026

More Anti-Gun “Trajectories” and “Experiments” on the Horizon in Illinois for 2026

As a new year begins, a timeless new year resolution remains: Work hard to ensure your state does not become like Illinois. As multiple firearm-related news outlets revisit the highs and lows of 2025, it ...

2025 Litigation Update

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

2025 Litigation Update

In 2025, the National Rifle Association defeated New Mexico’s 7-day waiting period for firearm purchases, the ATF’s “engaged in the business” rule, the ATF’s “pistol brace” rule, a lawsuit seeking to ban lead ammunition in ...

North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Tuesday, December 16, 2025

North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

In September, the North Carolina General Assembly briefly returned from recess and re-referred Senate Bill 50, Freedom to Carry NC, to the House Rules Committee.

Virginia: More Gun Control Bills Filed Including Semi-Auto Ban and Tax on Suppressors!

Thursday, January 8, 2026

Virginia: More Gun Control Bills Filed Including Semi-Auto Ban and Tax on Suppressors!

Anti-gun legislators in Richmond have been busy ahead of the 2026 legislative session working on ways to burden your Second Amendment rights.

U.S. DOJ and 25 States File Amicus Briefs Supporting NRA Challenge to California Ammunition Regulations

Tuesday, January 6, 2026

U.S. DOJ and 25 States File Amicus Briefs Supporting NRA Challenge to California Ammunition Regulations

The U.S. Department of Justice and a coalition of 25 states have each filed amicus briefs in Rhode v. Bonta, a case backed by the National Rifle Association and California Rifle and Pistol Association challenging California’s ...

2025 Grassroots Year In Review

Take Action  

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

2025 Grassroots Year In Review

As 2026 starts, we want to pause and recognize what we have accomplished together in 2025—and, more importantly, the work that all of you contributed to help us achieve these victories.

Sole Remaining Municipal Gun-Industry Lawsuit Grinds to Final Defeat

News  

Tuesday, January 6, 2026

Sole Remaining Municipal Gun-Industry Lawsuit Grinds to Final Defeat

In 1999, when the rest of the country was fretting over the potential Y2K disruption of worldwide computer systems, the City of Gary, Indiana launched its lawsuit against handgun manufacturers, retailers and a wholesaler, raising ...

California: 2026 Legislative Session Is Now Underway!

Monday, January 5, 2026

California: 2026 Legislative Session Is Now Underway!

Today, January 5th, the California Legislature reconvened for the 2026 legislative session, marking the second year of the two-year legislative cycle. As in years past, gun control advocates are expected to continue pushing their anti-gun ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.