Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Feinstein Pushes to Ban America’s Most Popular Firearm, Again

Friday, March 22, 2019

Feinstein Pushes to Ban America’s Most Popular Firearm, Again

"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them, ‘Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in,’ I would have done it."—U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein

It’s been nearly 25 years since Dianne Feinstein uttered those words while discussing the 1994 ban on semiautomatic rifles, handguns and shotguns. With that proclamation, she made clear that her ultimate goal when it comes to firearms in the hands of law-abiding citizens is nothing short of confiscation.

Of course, the ’94 ban was an absolute failure. Sold to the country, by Feinstein and others, as a means to combat violent crime, a congressionally-mandated study of its effectiveness showed it had no impact on crime. After 10 years, the ban ended when Congress wisely chose to not renew it.

Fast-forward a quarter century since that misguided, ineffective federal semi-auto ban was enacted, and Feinstein is still in the Senate, and still promoting banning firearms.

Some things never change.   "If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them, ‘Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in,’ I would have done it."—U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein

The latest attack on the Second Amendment by California’s senior Senator comes in the form of S. 66, which she introduced on January 9. And while she has made changes to what was enacted in 1994, those changes have made a bad old law into a worse proposed new law.

First, she has greatly expanded the number of firearms that would be impacted. The 1994 ban specifically named about two dozen firearms to be designated as “semiautomatic assault weapons.” Feinstein’s S. 66 singles out more than 200.

It gets worse.

The ’94 generic definition of a “semiautomatic assault weapon” has been expanded to include almost all popular semiautomatic rifles.

And while S. 66 does grandfather in a “semiautomatic assault weapon” if it was owned prior to the ban’s restrictions going into effect, any future transfer of an affected rifle would be subject to a NICS check. That includes transferring the rifle as a “sale, gift, or loan.”

Do you want to give your spouse one of the affected firearms as a gift? NICS check.

Do you want to take your kids out on your own property, where it is completely legal and safe to discharge a firearm, to give them basic safety and marksmanship lessons with an affected firearm? NICS check.

Do you want to loan your neighbor, who you know to be a law-abiding citizen that is familiar with the safe, responsible handling of firearms, one of your affected guns? NICS check.

The NICS check will have to be done through a Federal Firearms License (FFL) holder, so every one of these “transactions” will require a trip to a gun store. Those in rural areas may find this quite prohibitive, as is likely the intent, as the closest FFL holder could be hours away.

Another failed policy included in S. 66, which was also found in the ’94 ban, is the prohibition on “large capacity feeding device(s).” The same arbitrarily-chosen magazine capacity applies; 10 rounds. This, of course, is a lower capacity than the magazines that come standard with the most popular firearms sold today.

Like the firearms affected by S. 66, impacted magazines are also grandfathered, with one key difference. Future transfers of the affected magazines are prohibited. As the bill is currently drafted, you can transfer an affected firearm through an FFL, but not the magazine that came with it if it exceeds “legal” capacity.

Although Feinstein’s latest attack on our Right to Keep and Bear Arms is much worse than previous iterations, some things have improved.

In 1994, the Senate was controlled by anti-gun Senators, with an anti-gun President pushing for a ban. Today, the Senate is under pro-gun control, and President Donald Trump has stated opposition to such a ban.

In addition, we have had two Supreme Court cases affirm that the Second Amendment protects a right to possess firearms “in common use at the time for lawful purposes.” S. 66 seeks to ban the most popular class of rifles in America, with an estimated 16 million having been produced since the ’94 ban expired.

Anti-gun extremists may face more difficulties in promoting their latest federal ban, but that doesn’t mean those who cherish freedom should be complacent. I urge you to contact your Senators and urge them to reject S. 66. This is just the latest attempt to ban the most popular firearms in America, and, as Senator Feinstein has admitted, merely a stepping stone toward her true goal; eventual confiscation.

Chris W. Cox

BY Chris W. Cox

NRA-ILA Executive Director

Follow This Contributor

Chris W. Cox has served as the executive director of the Institute for Legislative Action, the political and lobbying arm of NRA, since 2002. As NRA’s principal political strategist, Cox oversees eight NRA-ILA divisions: Federal Affairs; State & Local Affairs; Public Affairs; Grassroots; Finance; Research & Information; Conservation, Wildlife & Natural Resources; and Office of Legislative Counsel. Cox also serves as chairman of NRA’s Political Victory Fund (NRA-PVF), the Association’s political action committee; president of the NRA Freedom Action Foundation (NRA-FAF), which focuses on non-partisan voter registration and citizen education; and chairman of NRA Country, an effort to bring country music artists together with NRA members in support of our Second Amendment freedoms and hunting heritage.

TRENDING NOW
Dick’s Spends Big on Gun-Chopping, Virtue-Signaling Bonanza (But It Will Still Sell You a Firearm)

News  

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Dick’s Spends Big on Gun-Chopping, Virtue-Signaling Bonanza (But It Will Still Sell You a Firearm)

Ed Stack, the CEO of Dick’s Sporting Goods, wants you to know he’s committed to keeping AR-15s “off the street.” But he’s also committed (for the time being) to selling other types of firearms.

California: Anti-Gun and Anti-Hunting Bill Signed into Law

Monday, October 14, 2019

California: Anti-Gun and Anti-Hunting Bill Signed into Law

Prior to the October 13 deadline, Governor Newsom signed the final anti-gun and anti-hunting bills, AB 1254 and SB 172 into law.  

California: Governor Newsom Signs Anti-Gun Bills into Law

Friday, October 11, 2019

California: Governor Newsom Signs Anti-Gun Bills into Law

Earlier today, Governor Newsom signed the seven anti-gun bills listed below into law.  

Number of Concealed Carry Permit Holders Increased Again

News  

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Number of Concealed Carry Permit Holders Increased Again

Last week, economist John Lott of the Crime Prevention Research Center released “Concealed Carry Permit Holders Across the United States: 2019,” his annual report on the number of concealed carry permit holders in the U.S.

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

Grassroots Spotlight: NRA-ILA Fighting the Bloomberg Money In Virginia 2019 Elections

News  

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Grassroots Spotlight: NRA-ILA Fighting the Bloomberg Money In Virginia 2019 Elections

The Nov. 5th election may be the most consequential ever for our Second Amendment rights in the Commonwealth. That’s because every seat in the Virginia House of Delegates and Senate is up for grabs and gun control ...

Virginia’s Anti-gun Politicians Put Politics Before Fighting Gun Crime

News  

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Virginia’s Anti-gun Politicians Put Politics Before Fighting Gun Crime

Virginia’s anti-gun politicians are serious about attacking law-abiding gun owners, but are indifferent about actual gun crime. As highlighted in a recent report in the Washington Free Beacon by Stephen Gutowski, the Virginia Department of Justice Services ...

Illinois: Task Force May Ponder More Gun Control

Tuesday, October 15, 2019

Illinois: Task Force May Ponder More Gun Control

The Illinois House Firearm Public Awareness Task Force is scheduled to meet on October 16, 2019. The task force could potentially make policy recommendations with various gun control schemes. %MCEPASTEBIN%

Kamala Harris and Her Perplexing Anti-Gun Ideas

News  

Friday, August 2, 2019

Kamala Harris and Her Perplexing Anti-Gun Ideas

U.S. Senator Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), one of the two-dozen Democrat presidential hopefuls vying to take on President Donald Trump in 2020, has been promoting her anti-gun platform for many months. This isn’t really news, as ...

Member Spotlight: Meet the Police Officer Who Told Congress She ‘Would Not Comply' with a Gun Ban

News  

Friday, October 4, 2019

Member Spotlight: Meet the Police Officer Who Told Congress She ‘Would Not Comply' with a Gun Ban

Last week, a retired Tulsa, Oklahoma law enforcement officer testified in a Congressional hearing that she “would not comply” if Congress passes a ban on firearms. Her bold assertion earned her national media attention and ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.