Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Florida Alert! Gun Rights Groups, Moody Target Assault Weapons Ban

Tuesday, November 5, 2019

DATE:     November 5, 2019
TO:         USF & NRA Members and Friends
FROM:    Marion P. Hammer
  USF Executive Director
  NRA Past President

An anti-gun organization called BAWN (Ban Assault Weapons Now) has been gathering petition signatures in an effort to put a constitutional amendment on the November 2020 election ballot to ban possession of so-called "assault weapons."  In reality, the amendment would effectively BAN ALL SEMIAUTOMATIC LONG GUNS. 

Under the proposed ballot language, possession of commonly owned long guns like the Ruger 10-22 rifles (including youth models), Marlin Model 60 .22 rifles, Remington Model 1100 shotguns, Benelli semi-automatic shotguns (and on and on) would be banned. 

Using deliberately deceptive language, they are intentionally attempting to confuse voters by calling it an "Assault Weapons" ban.  In order to get their fraudulent amendment on the ballot, they must not only collect signatures from unsuspecting voters, they must also convince the Florida Supreme Court that the language is clear and unambiguous.  The following article is reprinted with permission.  It details much of the intentional deception perpetrated by the gun banners.  

Be very clear, these gun banners want to put a GUN BAN IN THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION so that when their scheme is exposed as a fraud, it can't be fixed by the legislature. 

The three briefs against this ballot language have been filed with the Florida Supreme Court and are discussed in the article below.  LINKS to all three briefs are included following this article. 

Reprinted with Permission

GUN RIGHTS GROUPS, MOODY TARGET ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN

November 4, 2019

Dara Kam 

TALLAHASSEE --- The National Rifle Association condemned a proposed constitutional amendment that aims to do away with assault weapons in Florida as a “classic example of impermissible political rhetoric” designed to inflame voters’ emotions. 

“The amendment hides behind political rhetoric and a misleading ballot summary to coax voters into abridging their existing right under the Florida Constitution to keep and bear arms and criminalizing the most commonly owned rifles and shotguns in America,” lawyers for the gun-rights organization wrote in a brief filed Friday with the Florida Supreme Court. 

The organization’s arguments were among three briefs filed Friday in opposition to the proposed amendment, which the political committee Ban Assault Weapons NOW is trying to place on the November 2020 ballot. The Supreme Court is poised to decide whether the wording of the ballot proposal meets legal requirements. 

The NRA, Attorney General Ashley Moody and the National Shooting Sports Foundation argued separately in the briefs that the proposed amendment should be blocked. The NRA focused, in part, on the term “assault weapons.” 

“Coined by anti-gun activists as a derogatory and pejorative term, its prime function is not to inform and describe in a clear, neutral, and objective way, but to deliver rhetorical impact and evoke emotion and condemnation,” the NRA, represented by Andy Bardos and other GrayRobinson attorneys, said in a 34-page brief. 

The NRA noted that the court previously has forbidden the use of “political rhetoric” in ballot language, which the Florida Constitution requires to be “clear and unambiguous.” 

“Words such as ‘assault weapons’ that inflame and advocate have no place on the state’s official ballot,” Bardos wrote. 

The Ban Assault Weapons NOW proposal emerged last year after the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland. Committee chairwoman Gail Schwartz is the aunt of Alex Schachter, who was among the 14 students and three faculty members slain during the school shooting. 

To reach the ballot, Ban Assault Weapons NOW would need the Supreme Court to sign off on the wording. Also, it would need to submit 766,200 valid petition signatures to the state by a February deadline. As of Monday afternoon, it had submitted 115,529. 

Moody filed an initial document with the Supreme Court in July indicating she would seek to block the amendment. Her office and the gun-rights groups filed detailed briefs Friday. 

Along with objecting to the term “assault weapons,” the NRA contends the proposal fails to meet legal criteria in other ways. 

For example, the NRA says the proposal fails to inform voters that it would affect not only the personal possession of most semi-automatic long guns, but also the manufacture and export of those weapons, and “thus prohibits an entire industry” in Florida. 

The NRA’s lawyers also argued that the term “assault weapons” is misleading “because it evokes deceptive imagery of military-grade, combat-style weaponry,” but actually would affect a “much broader spectrum of firearms that includes virtually every semi-automatic rifle and shotgun on the market today.” 

That argument mirrors one made by Moody, a Republican last November, who called the proposal “virtually a blanket ban” on long guns. 

The ballot proposal would prohibit possession of “semi-automatic rifles and shotguns capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition at once, either in a fixed or detachable magazine, or any other ammunition-feeding device.” 

The proposal would essentially ban all long guns because they can be fitted with accessories that would allow them to hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition at once, Moody’s lawyers and other opponents of the measure argued. 

“The proposed amendment is, in practical application, a ban on virtually all semi-automatic long guns. This is so because virtually all semi-automatic long guns --- either off-the-shelf or by virtue of broadly available accessories --- hold, or are ‘capable’ of holding, more than 10 rounds of ammunition,” Moody’s lawyers wrote in a 27-page brief. “The ballot summary does not disclose this effect, which Florida voters are unlikely to understand absent explanation.” 

The proposal also “exempts and requires registration of assault weapons lawfully possessed” at the time the measure would go into effect. 

But that provision in the ballot summary also is misleading because “it misstates the nature of the exemption,” which would apply only to current owners, Moody’s lawyers argued. 

“In other words, the ballot summary creates the false impression that current owners who register their firearms would be able to lawfully transfer ownership of those firearms,” Deputy Solicitor General James H. Percival wrote. 

Lawyers representing the National Shooting Sports Foundation argued that the proposed amendment “is an unlawful threat to the rights” of its members “who engage in lawful commerce in firearms and ammunition … as well as the interests of its outdoorsmen and sportsmen members.” 

Proponents of the measure, which would not prohibit handguns, have two more weeks to file briefs in the case, with the Supreme Court scheduled to hold hear arguments on Feb. 4. 

Ben Pollara, an adviser to the committee behind the proposal, said in August that the measure is “very simple.” 

“If you have a semi-automatic rifle or shotgun that can accept a high amount of ammunition, 10 rounds or more, then it is prohibited. And if you own one of those guns when this is passed, then you can keep it,” Pollara told The News Service of Florida at the time. 

The proposed amendment “isn’t terribly confusing,” Pollara said. 

“We’re not trying to take anybody’s legally owned weapons. What we’re trying to do is stop the sale and future possession of military-type assault weapons that are capable of firing of a bunch of rounds in a very short time and killing a lot of people,” he said.

_______________ 

NRA brief:

  https://efactssc-public.flcourts.org/casedocuments/2019/1266/2019-1266_brief_135502_initial20brief2dmerits.pdf

 

NSSF brief:

  https://efactssc-public.flcourts.org/casedocuments/2019/1266/2019-1266_brief_135498_initial20brief2dmerits.pdf

 

Attorney General Moody brief:

  https://efactssc-public.flcourts.org/casedocuments/2019/1266/2019-1266_brief_135503_initial20brief2dmerits.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TRENDING NOW
Colorado: Mandatory Storage Bill Passes General Assembly and Semi-Auto Ban Temporarily Removed from Calendar

Tuesday, March 26, 2024

Colorado: Mandatory Storage Bill Passes General Assembly and Semi-Auto Ban Temporarily Removed from Calendar

In a temporary reprieve for Colorado gun owners, the semi-auto ban HB24-1292 has been removed from the calendar. But we cannot let our guard down as gun control advocates can bring it up for a vote at ...

The U.S. Supreme Court Looks at Government “Blacklists”

News  

Tuesday, March 26, 2024

The U.S. Supreme Court Looks at Government “Blacklists”

Much of the attention this past week in the United States Supreme Court was the oral arguments in National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo, No. 22-842, a First Amendment case on whether government officials ...

Colorado: Semi-Auto Ban Passes Committee and Sensitive Places Bill Hearing Rescheduled for Today!

Wednesday, March 20, 2024

Colorado: Semi-Auto Ban Passes Committee and Sensitive Places Bill Hearing Rescheduled for Today!

Yesterday the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing on House Bill 24-1292, the semi-auto ban, that lasted over 12 hours where hundreds of patriotic Coloradans overloaded the committee with opposition testimony. The hearing concluded with an ...

NRA Files Amicus Brief Asking Supreme Court to Hear Antonyuk v. James

News  

Second Amendment  

Monday, March 25, 2024

NRA Files Amicus Brief Asking Supreme Court to Hear Antonyuk v. James

In response to the NRA’s victory in Bruen, which secured every American’s right to carry arms, NY passed the “Concealed Carry Improvement Act,” severely restricting carry throughout the state. The 2nd Circuit upheld many of ...

25 years and one PLCAA Later, Chicago is Still Harassing Gunmakers

News  

Tuesday, March 26, 2024

25 years and one PLCAA Later, Chicago is Still Harassing Gunmakers

On March 19, the city of Chicago filed suit against handgun manufacturer Glock. Seeking to shift responsibility for the city’s woeful governance, Chicago’s lawsuit blames the popular firearm manufacturer for the third-party criminal misuse of ...

Washington: Governor Signs Anti-Gun Legislation

Wednesday, March 27, 2024

Washington: Governor Signs Anti-Gun Legislation

Today, Governor Inslee signed five anti-gun bills into law that were recently passed by the Washington State Legislature. The bills include:

Anti-gun Democrats Seek to Undermine Law Passed to Protect Veterans’ Rights

News  

Tuesday, March 19, 2024

Anti-gun Democrats Seek to Undermine Law Passed to Protect Veterans’ Rights

Last week we reported on a major breakthrough on behalf of veterans who risked losing their Second Amendment rights because of a long-running scheme by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to report certain beneficiaries ...

Colorado: Semi-Auto Ban Scheduled for Floor Vote Today!

Thursday, March 21, 2024

Colorado: Semi-Auto Ban Scheduled for Floor Vote Today!

Today, the House is scheduled to vote on HB24-1292, the ban on semi-automatic firearms. Please contact your legislators today by using the button below and urge them to OPPOSE HB24-1292!

Louisiana: Firearms Bills on the Move - Take Action Now!

Monday, March 25, 2024

Louisiana: Firearms Bills on the Move - Take Action Now!

A number of firearm-related bills, including enhanced preemption, are moving in the Louisiana Legislature. It's critical that NRA members and Second Amendment supporters get involved to keep the momentum going!

Pennsylvania: Senate Committee Passes Full Inclusion Sunday Hunting

Wednesday, March 20, 2024

Pennsylvania: Senate Committee Passes Full Inclusion Sunday Hunting

On Wednesday, the Senate Game & Fisheries Committee voted 7-4 to pass Senate Bill 67 to the Senate floor for a vote. 

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.