Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

U.S. Appellate Court Issues Case on Marijuana Use and Firearm Possession

Monday, January 13, 2025

U.S. Appellate Court Issues Case on Marijuana Use and Firearm Possession

Last Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit – which encompasses Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas – reversed the conviction of a man under a federal law that prohibits firearm possession by one who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance{.]” The substance in question was marijuana. The case, U.S. v. Daniels, adds to a growing body of law critically re-examining broad prohibited person” statutes under the U.S. Supreme Courts “ text, history and tradition” standard of review for Second Amendment cases reaffirmed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.

In April 2022, police officers pulled over Patrick Daniels, Jr., for driving without a license plate. One smelled marijuana while approaching the vehicle, searched it, and found burnt butts from several marijuana cigarettes in the ashtray. He also found two loaded firearms, one within arms reach and one nearby in the trucks back seat.

Daniels was arrested and transported to the local U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency office. He waived his Miranda rights and admitted he had been a regular marijuana user since high school, smoking the drug approximately fourteen days out of a month.” The agents did not, however, ascertain or render an opinion as to whether Daniels was under the influence of marijuana at the time of his arrest.

Daniels was charged under 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3) (which codifies the above-mentioned prohibition), convicted, and sentenced to nearly four years in federal prison. Daniels successfully appealed his conviction, with a prior Fifth Circuit opinion finding that applying 922(g)(3) to his case violated the Second Amendment.

But the U.S. Supreme Court overturned that opinion and ordered the Fifth Circuit to rehear Danielss case in light of the high courts opinion in U.S. v. Rahimi, which held that [w]hen an individual poses a clear threat of physical violence to another, the threatening individual may be disarmed” consistent with the Second Amendment. Rahimi had been convicted under a different federal statute that applies to a person subject to a domestic violence order of protection, issued after a finding that the person represents a credible threat to the physical safety of [an] intimate partner or child [of such intimate partner.]”

Mondays opinion was the result of the Fifth Circuits reconsideration of its prior decision in Daniels. As before, the Fifth Circuit determined that 922(g)(3) was not per se unconstitutional and allowed the statute itself to stand. The judges agreed the statute could be validly applied where the accused was determined to be actively impaired by illegal drug use at the time of the firearm possession.  They also agreed it could not be constitutionally applied where it seeks to disarm an individual solely based on habitual or occasional drug use.’”

Circuit Judge Jerry Smith, who authorized Mondays opinion, further opined 922(g)(3) might be applicable where the illegal drug use was so regular and heavy that it rendered the person continually impaired,” even when not acutely intoxicated.

In Danielss case, however, the jury was allowed to find him guilty on a determination that the unlawful use has occurred recently enough to indicate that the individual is actively engaged in such conduct.” This language was included in a regulation ATF promulgated to implement 922(g)(3). Yet the Daniels court found it doom[ed his} conviction” because it could apply to the sort of habitual or occasional drug use” that has no historical basis under the Second Amendment as grounds for a lifetime firearm prohibition.

The Fifth Circuits decision is especially relevant, given the nations shifting legal landscape over marijuana possession and use. A marijuana advocacy group reports that 28 U.S. states and territories now allow for legal marijuana use under at least some circumstances. The number increases to 47 states and territories where only medical use is considered.

Marijuana use is no longer limited to the domain of indigenous religious customs or youth-oriented counterculture and now includes a wide variety of people who use it for medicinal or recreational reasons. Many of these individuals are otherwise law-abiding and productive members of their communities and want to exercise their right to keep and bear arms. 

Yet federal law continues to ban outright the cultivation, possession, and distribution of marijuana, as well as the possession of marijuana paraphernalia.

This has led to a confusing regulatory landscape. The Biden-Harris administration, for example, has taken a hands-off approach to enforcing federal laws in the context of marijuana commerce or use that is lawful in the jurisdiction in which it occurs. Yet the ATF has since the Obama-Biden administration remained contradictorily committed to enforcing 922(g)(3) against marijuana users, even those complying with the laws of their states.

Whatever position one takes on the use of marijuana, Americans deserve laws that are clear, that are consistently and fairly applied, and that comply with the U.S. Constitution, as it was understood when it was adopted and amended in relevant respects. As the Daniels case indicates, the country is still struggling to reach that standard when it comes to marijuana use and firearms. 

TRENDING NOW
U.S. Court of Appeals Backtracks on Adverse Suppressor Ruling

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

U.S. Court of Appeals Backtracks on Adverse Suppressor Ruling

In a single sentence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit added to the high-profile and consequential national conversation on firearm suppressors.

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

News  

Second Amendment  

Thursday, May 22, 2025

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

Earlier today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R.1 the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which included Section 2 of the Hearing Protection Act, completely removing suppressors from the National Firearms Act (NFA).

2A News Out of New Jersey You Won’t Believe: It’s Actually a Good Thing!

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

2A News Out of New Jersey You Won’t Believe: It’s Actually a Good Thing!

The Garden State is not where most seek positive developments regarding our right to arms, so we were pleasantly surprised when Englishtown, N.J., recently made a move to support the Second Amendment.

Switched Off: A Case Study on Minnesota’s Illegal Machine Gun Law

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

Switched Off: A Case Study on Minnesota’s Illegal Machine Gun Law

There’s been a lot of noise of late about auto sears or so-called “Glock switches” – devices to convert a semiautomatic firearm into an automatic weapon. 

Update: Washington Post Fact Checks Misleading Ad Council “Children” and Firearms Talking Point

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

Update: Washington Post Fact Checks Misleading Ad Council “Children” and Firearms Talking Point

Last week, NRA-ILA explained how a recent public service announcement campaign from the federally-funded Ad Council, and the gun control lobby more broadly, manipulates statistics to create misleading talking points about “children” and firearms.

DOJ Files Amicus Brief Supporting NRA-Backed Challenge to IL’s Ban on “Assault Weapons” and “Large-Capacity Magazines”

Tuesday, June 17, 2025

DOJ Files Amicus Brief Supporting NRA-Backed Challenge to IL’s Ban on “Assault Weapons” and “Large-Capacity Magazines”

Last Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice filed an amicus brief in the Seventh Circuit supporting an NRA-backed challenge to Illinois’s prohibition on so-called “assault weapons” and “large-capacity magazines.”

Ninth Circuit Strikes Down CA’s One-Gun-A-Month Law

Friday, June 20, 2025

Ninth Circuit Strikes Down CA’s One-Gun-A-Month Law

Today, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that California’s law prohibiting people from buying more than one firearm in a 30-day period violates the Second Amendment.

Gun-Control Window Dressing: Chicago Inspector-General Calls Out Futility of Gun Offender Registry

News  

Monday, June 16, 2025

Gun-Control Window Dressing: Chicago Inspector-General Calls Out Futility of Gun Offender Registry

Fifteen years ago, the City of Chicago adopted a “gun offender registry” ordinance that requires convicted gun offenders to register with the police and have police monitor anyone listed in the registry. 

Rhode Island: Legislature Passes Semi-Auto Ban

Sunday, June 22, 2025

Rhode Island: Legislature Passes Semi-Auto Ban

After years of showing up at the Statehouse in huge numbers fighting against a drastic semi-auto ban, gun owners were rightfully upset when the Legislature finally pushed an amended version across the finish line to ...

The Trace Marks a Birthday: Ten Years of Anti-gun Propaganda, Little to Show for It

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

The Trace Marks a Birthday: Ten Years of Anti-gun Propaganda, Little to Show for It

On June 18, the anti-gun propaganda mill The Trace celebrated its tenth birthday with a self-congratulatory article entitled “How The Trace Came to Be and Other Stories From Our Early Days.” 

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.