Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

U.S. Appellate Court Issues Case on Marijuana Use and Firearm Possession

Monday, January 13, 2025

U.S. Appellate Court Issues Case on Marijuana Use and Firearm Possession

Last Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit – which encompasses Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas – reversed the conviction of a man under a federal law that prohibits firearm possession by one who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance{.]” The substance in question was marijuana. The case, U.S. v. Daniels, adds to a growing body of law critically re-examining broad prohibited person” statutes under the U.S. Supreme Courts “ text, history and tradition” standard of review for Second Amendment cases reaffirmed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.

In April 2022, police officers pulled over Patrick Daniels, Jr., for driving without a license plate. One smelled marijuana while approaching the vehicle, searched it, and found burnt butts from several marijuana cigarettes in the ashtray. He also found two loaded firearms, one within arms reach and one nearby in the trucks back seat.

Daniels was arrested and transported to the local U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency office. He waived his Miranda rights and admitted he had been a regular marijuana user since high school, smoking the drug approximately fourteen days out of a month.” The agents did not, however, ascertain or render an opinion as to whether Daniels was under the influence of marijuana at the time of his arrest.

Daniels was charged under 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3) (which codifies the above-mentioned prohibition), convicted, and sentenced to nearly four years in federal prison. Daniels successfully appealed his conviction, with a prior Fifth Circuit opinion finding that applying 922(g)(3) to his case violated the Second Amendment.

But the U.S. Supreme Court overturned that opinion and ordered the Fifth Circuit to rehear Danielss case in light of the high courts opinion in U.S. v. Rahimi, which held that [w]hen an individual poses a clear threat of physical violence to another, the threatening individual may be disarmed” consistent with the Second Amendment. Rahimi had been convicted under a different federal statute that applies to a person subject to a domestic violence order of protection, issued after a finding that the person represents a credible threat to the physical safety of [an] intimate partner or child [of such intimate partner.]”

Mondays opinion was the result of the Fifth Circuits reconsideration of its prior decision in Daniels. As before, the Fifth Circuit determined that 922(g)(3) was not per se unconstitutional and allowed the statute itself to stand. The judges agreed the statute could be validly applied where the accused was determined to be actively impaired by illegal drug use at the time of the firearm possession.  They also agreed it could not be constitutionally applied where it seeks to disarm an individual solely based on habitual or occasional drug use.’”

Circuit Judge Jerry Smith, who authorized Mondays opinion, further opined 922(g)(3) might be applicable where the illegal drug use was so regular and heavy that it rendered the person continually impaired,” even when not acutely intoxicated.

In Danielss case, however, the jury was allowed to find him guilty on a determination that the unlawful use has occurred recently enough to indicate that the individual is actively engaged in such conduct.” This language was included in a regulation ATF promulgated to implement 922(g)(3). Yet the Daniels court found it doom[ed his} conviction” because it could apply to the sort of habitual or occasional drug use” that has no historical basis under the Second Amendment as grounds for a lifetime firearm prohibition.

The Fifth Circuits decision is especially relevant, given the nations shifting legal landscape over marijuana possession and use. A marijuana advocacy group reports that 28 U.S. states and territories now allow for legal marijuana use under at least some circumstances. The number increases to 47 states and territories where only medical use is considered.

Marijuana use is no longer limited to the domain of indigenous religious customs or youth-oriented counterculture and now includes a wide variety of people who use it for medicinal or recreational reasons. Many of these individuals are otherwise law-abiding and productive members of their communities and want to exercise their right to keep and bear arms. 

Yet federal law continues to ban outright the cultivation, possession, and distribution of marijuana, as well as the possession of marijuana paraphernalia.

This has led to a confusing regulatory landscape. The Biden-Harris administration, for example, has taken a hands-off approach to enforcing federal laws in the context of marijuana commerce or use that is lawful in the jurisdiction in which it occurs. Yet the ATF has since the Obama-Biden administration remained contradictorily committed to enforcing 922(g)(3) against marijuana users, even those complying with the laws of their states.

Whatever position one takes on the use of marijuana, Americans deserve laws that are clear, that are consistently and fairly applied, and that comply with the U.S. Constitution, as it was understood when it was adopted and amended in relevant respects. As the Daniels case indicates, the country is still struggling to reach that standard when it comes to marijuana use and firearms. 

TRENDING NOW
North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Last week the North Carolina General Assembly briefly returned from recess and re-referred Senate Bill 50, Freedom to Carry NC, to the House Rules Committee.

Federal Court Strikes Down Biden Administration’s “Engaged in the Business” Rule in NRA Case

Thursday, October 2, 2025

Federal Court Strikes Down Biden Administration’s “Engaged in the Business” Rule in NRA Case

Yesterday, in Butler v. Bondi, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama held that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives exceeded its statutory authority by issuing its 2024 Final Rule expanding ...

First Affirmative Lawsuit in Support of Gun Owners Filed by Trump’s DOJ

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

First Affirmative Lawsuit in Support of Gun Owners Filed by Trump’s DOJ

California officials’ egregious foot-dragging over the issuance of carry permits has finally attracted the ire of the federal Department of Justice (DOJ). 

President Trump’s GOP Leads Polling on Crime and Guns, To No Surprise

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

President Trump’s GOP Leads Polling on Crime and Guns, To No Surprise

A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll revealed that Americans know the President Donald Trump-led Republican Party has a better plan than their Democratic Party opponents on crime and gun control.

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Fifth Circuit Case Challenging the Federal Switchblade Act

Friday, October 3, 2025

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Fifth Circuit Case Challenging the Federal Switchblade Act

Yesterday, the National Rifle Association filed an amicus brief in Knife Rights, Inc. v. Bondi, urging the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas’s decision upholding the Federal ...

Trump Administration Repeals Biden Era Firearms Export Crackdown

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

Trump Administration Repeals Biden Era Firearms Export Crackdown

Last Monday, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) at the U.S. Department of Commerce published a final rule that reversed a crackdown on the commercial export of firearms from the U.S. to other countries.

Trust in Mass Media Craters to New Lows, in Single Digits With Republicans

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

Trust in Mass Media Craters to New Lows, in Single Digits With Republicans

There’s an old saying that rings especially true to Second Amendment supporters: If you don’t read the news, you’re uninformed.

Alphabet Eases the Reins on Censorship; Will Gun Content Eventually Benefit?

News  

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

Alphabet Eases the Reins on Censorship; Will Gun Content Eventually Benefit?

With the free speech debate recently co-opted by one TV host’s use of false and incendiary remarks about his political opponents, it might have been easy to miss another important First Amendment story last week. 

Canada’s Public Safety Minister on Gun Ban & Confiscation: “Don’t Ask Me to Explain the Logic”

News  

Monday, September 29, 2025

Canada’s Public Safety Minister on Gun Ban & Confiscation: “Don’t Ask Me to Explain the Logic”

There have been multiple developments on the Canadian gun grab and ban in the last few days, but the most astounding has got to be a leaked bombshell recording of the Liberal Public Safety Minister, ...

U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Challenge to Hawaii’s Private Property Default Carry Ban

Friday, October 3, 2025

U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Challenge to Hawaii’s Private Property Default Carry Ban

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the petition for certiorari in Wolford v. Lopez, a challenge to Hawaii’s law forbidding carry on private property open to the public (such as restaurants, gas stations, and grocery stores) ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.