Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Washington Post Pivot to “Personal Liberties and Free Markets” Sparks Skepticism

Monday, March 10, 2025

Washington Post Pivot to “Personal Liberties and Free Markets” Sparks Skepticism

Jeff Bezos, owner of The Washington Post, recently announced to the staff of the newspaper that the publication’s opinion section would henceforth be advocating for “personal liberties and free markets” without contradiction. “I am of America and for America, and proud to be so,” Mr. Bezos said, according to a New York Times account of the announcement. Views that dissented from those principles could be left to “the Internet,” the Hill reported Bezos as telling his staff.

Reactions to Bezos’s announcement among The Post’s writers were as comical as they were predictable. But if this new embrace of “personal liberties” includes the Second Amendment, that would indeed be a notable departure for The Washington Post, which has long been a reliable mouthpiece for the firearm prohibition agenda.

Taken at face value, “personal liberties and free markets” is simply an articulation of two of the nation’s most enduring and fundamental principles. The response to their invocation among the Post’s staff – which ranged from outrage to panic – is therefore telling. The opinion section’s editor, David Shipley, decided to quit after failing, The Times said, to get his boss “to reconsider the new direction.” Other staffers seethed about what the Times reported as a “major departure from the newspaper’s decades-long approach to commentary and criticism.” Curiously, The Times also described it as a “rightward shift,” although personal liberties (at least) used to have advocates on the left as well.

The Times noted the announcement “led to immediate and public pushback from members of The Post’s opinion and news staff.” The paper’s chief “economics reporter” took to social media with threats to immediately quit if he felt “encroachment” or “interfere[ence.]” Employees were said to be “shocked and stunned at the sudden turn of events,” with their “discontent” made clear during an “emotional meeting” with the outgoing opinion editor.

Freedom and capitalism will obviously not be easy or intuitive concepts for the editorialists of the flagship newspaper in the Nation’s Capital to promote.

Second Amendment issues, in particular, will require a massive attitude adjustment and learning curve.

It wasn’t long ago that The Post was bragging about winning a Pulitzer Prize (for whatever that’s worth these days) for its stalkerish, 15 article series on the AR-15, America’s most popular rifle. To be fair, The Post did acknowledge Eugene Stoner’s greatest achievement as “iconic,” revered,” and “truly mainstream.” It did so, however, in the context condemning the nation’s elevation of the AR-15 to such prominence and ubiquity.

Titles in the series included, “The blast effect,” “Terror on repeat,” “A tragedy without end,” and “The radicals’ rifle.” After admitting that “1 in 20 U.S. adults owns at least one AR-15,” The Post concluded its series with an editorial that, as usual, claimed it knew better than a broad swath of the American public. “No one needs an AR-15,” the editorial board huffed, “There is no excuse for the widespread availability of these weapons of war.”

By The Post’s own reporting, however, there could be some 20 million reasons spread among some 16 million people.

As NRA-ILA reported at the time, The Post’s AR-15 series did nothing so much as make the case for that gun’s protection under the Second Amendment, which the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly explained covers firearms “in common use” for lawful purposes, especially self-defense. Along with documenting the AR-15’s overwhelming popularity, The Post even helpfully commissioned a poll of AR-15 owners for the series, which confirmed, “Self-defense was the most popular reason for owning an AR-15.”

The Constitution and the expressed preferences of the American people, however, don’t hold much sway in The Washington Post’s offices … except when it comes to the First Amendment rights of professional, credentialed journalists. Democracy Dies in Darkness – according to The Post’s melodramatic masthead – unless its writers get to print whatever comes into their heads, no matter how untrue, poorly sourced, or athwart the rights of their fellow citizens it might be.

All that said, we are willing to give Jeff Bezos and his flailing newspaper a chance to right the ship, and if this new new edict marks a shift toward a more patriotic and liberty-minded Washington Post, the paper might just improve its bottom line, as well as its content.

In the meantime, we did notice a recent Post article profiling Americans exercising their right to arms, albeit from a distinctly inside-the-Beltway worldview. Well … American gun owners cover a lot of ground. Enough, perhaps, that even The Washington Post can relate to some of them.

IN THIS ARTICLE
Washington Post media bias
TRENDING NOW
Supreme Court Review Sought in NRA-Backed Challenge to California’s Magazine Ban

Friday, August 15, 2025

Supreme Court Review Sought in NRA-Backed Challenge to California’s Magazine Ban

Today, a Petition for Certiorari was filed asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Duncan v. Bonta, a case—backed by the National Rifle Association and California Rifle & Pistol Association—challenging California’s prohibition on magazines capable of holding ...

U.K. Police Target Gardening Tools, Salty Language

News  

Monday, August 18, 2025

U.K. Police Target Gardening Tools, Salty Language

Another week, another set of stories chronicling the sad demise of individual rights in the United Kingdom, where gardeners with pruning tools are treated like dangerous criminals and insulting crooks who plunder your store attracts more police attention ...

Tolerating Crime was a Choice for District of Columbia Officials

News  

Monday, August 18, 2025

Tolerating Crime was a Choice for District of Columbia Officials

On August 11, President Donald Trump declared a crime emergency in the nation’s capital. Fed up with a violent crime problem that has long been tolerated, and perhaps obfuscated, by D.C. officials, President Trump chose to exert his considerable ...

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging Massachusetts’s “Assault-Style” Firearms Ban

Thursday, August 21, 2025

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging Massachusetts’s “Assault-Style” Firearms Ban

Today, the National Rifle Association, Gun Owners’ Action League, Pioneer Valley Arms, three NRA members, and another individual filed a lawsuit challenging Massachusetts’s ban on “assault-style” firearms.

Washington Post Admits that Anti-gun Lawfare “Cannot be the Solution” to Crime

News  

Monday, March 17, 2025

Washington Post Admits that Anti-gun Lawfare “Cannot be the Solution” to Crime

In a turnabout worthy of Invasion of the Body Snatchers, The Washington Post (WAPO) published an editorial last Tuesday criticizing the gun control movement for ignoring the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) and pursuing its agenda in ...

El Paso County to Host Gun Turn-in Before State Ban

Wednesday, August 13, 2025

El Paso County to Host Gun Turn-in Before State Ban

On September 1st, gun turn-in programs will become illegal in the Lone Star State. These programs, often funded by taxpayer dollars, to purchase firearms from individuals have repeatedly failed to improve public safety, and have ...

Florida: Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday Signed by Governor

Monday, July 7, 2025

Florida: Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday Signed by Governor

Governor Ron DeSantis recently signed the Florida Budget for Fiscal Year 2025–2026, which includes a Second Amendment sales tax holiday from September 8 through December 31, 2025. The NRA is thankful for Governor DeSantis’ strong ...

Tenth Circuit Holds New Mexico’s 7-Day Waiting Period Unconstitutional in NRA Case

Tuesday, August 19, 2025

Tenth Circuit Holds New Mexico’s 7-Day Waiting Period Unconstitutional in NRA Case

Today, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals held New Mexico’s seven-day waiting period for firearm purchases unconstitutional in Ortega v. Grisham, a case brought by the National Rifle Association and Mountain States Legal Foundation, with the ...

North Carolina: Pro-Gun Bills Advance in Veto Override Session

Tuesday, July 29, 2025

North Carolina: Pro-Gun Bills Advance in Veto Override Session

During a veto override session on Tuesday, July 29th, both chambers passed House Bill 193 (H193) and defeated Governor Josh Stein's veto.

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

News  

Second Amendment  

Thursday, May 22, 2025

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

Earlier today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R.1 the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which included Section 2 of the Hearing Protection Act, completely removing suppressors from the National Firearms Act (NFA).

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.