Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Alphabet Eases the Reins on Censorship; Will Gun Content Eventually Benefit?

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

Alphabet Eases the Reins on Censorship; Will Gun Content Eventually Benefit?

With the free speech debate recently co-opted by one TV host’s use of false and incendiary remarks about his political opponents, it might have been easy to miss another important First Amendment story last week. Alphabet, home to Google – which in turn owns YouTube – announced that it was easing its “Community Guidelines” around material dealing with COVID-19 and the integrity of the 2020 presidential election. Along with allowing a broader range of discussion on these topics, it announced that it would provide an opportunity for creators whose accounts were terminated under the old rules to rejoin the platform. While this is welcome news from the host of the planet’s largest digital town squares, it begs another question: When will Alphabet relent on its clampdown of firearm-related speech?

Alphabet’s change of heart follows a House Judiciary Committee investigation of the Biden-Harris administration’s attempts to pressure tech companies to remove content and creators contradicting the administration’s messaging on COVID-19 and election integrity. A lengthy letter from Alphabet’s attorneys to Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH), dated Sept. 23, 2025, detailed Alphabet’s version of events.

Among the company’s disclosures were that “Senior Biden Administration officials, including White House officials, conducted repeated and sustained outreach to Alphabet and pressed the Company regarding certain user-generated content related to the COVID-19 pandemic that did not violate its policies.” These officials, the letter continued, “including President Biden, created a political atmosphere that sought to influence the actions of platforms based on their concerns regarding misinformation.” It characterized the Biden administration’s efforts at “dictat[ing]” company policies as ”unacceptable and wrong[.]”

The letter noted “YouTube’s current approach allows a wide range of content regarding COVID-19 and elections.”  Prior policies limiting discussions of these topics have been changed or sunsetted. Moreover, it announced, “YouTube will provide an opportunity for all creators to rejoin the platform if the Company terminated their channels for repeated violations of COVID-19 and elections integrity policies that are no longer in effect.” As the New York Post noted, such creators include a number of current Trump administration officials, including Dan Bongino, Sebastian Gorka, and Steve Bannon.

Civil rights advocates should be heartened by Alphabet’s recent moves to correct past censorship and should take note of how the Biden-Harris administration sought to suppress content that contradicted its own messaging, however inaccurate or incomplete.

But Alphabet continues to sharply moderate firearm-related speech, including content concerning entirely legal and common technology and practices. YouTube, for example, bans “[c]ontent intended to sell firearms, instruct viewers on how to make firearms, ammunition, and certain accessories, or instruct viewers on how to install those accessories[.]” It also censors “live streams that show someone holding, handling, or transporting a firearm,” no matter what the context. Moreover, it treats other legal, educational, and nonviolent firearm-related content as age-restricted for viewers under 18. Ironically, these restrictions apply only to “real use of firearms” and not to “artistic” portrayals of firearms, including their use to commit crime and violence in movies.

Moreover, Google’s advertising policies ban ads for functional guns – or, indeed, any “devices that appear to discharge a projectile at high velocity” – whether “for sport, self-defense, or combat[.]” Also prohibited are “[a]ds for any part or component, whether finished or unfinished, that's essential to or enhances the functionality of a gun” and “[a]ds for instructions on the assembly or enhancement of the functionality of firearms[.]”

As firearms enthusiasts know, these policies are broadly construed and have resulted in adverse actions against popular and mainstream creators and businesses engaged in lawful conduct and expression. These include Hickok45, Firearms Guide, and GunGuyTV. Some creators even reported having to resort to posting their content on adult entertainment sites to avoid the restrictions of the mainstream platforms.

As we noted elsewhere this week in relation to backlash from gun control supporters over Everytown’s new “firearms training” initiative, it’s futile and counterproductive to limit access to information about firearms in a country of well over 400 million of them. This speaks of ideological and cultural bigotry, not a serious attempt to promote a culture of safety and responsibility.

If Alphabet is serious about its professed commitment to free speech and open dialogue, it should revisit its restrictions on content relating to one of America’s foundational civil liberties, the right to keep and bear arms.

TRENDING NOW
Major Digital Currency’s Terms of Use Prohibit Firearm and Ammunition Sales

News  

Monday, October 20, 2025

Major Digital Currency’s Terms of Use Prohibit Firearm and Ammunition Sales

So much of the energy surrounding the digital currency space has been aimed at bringing forth a new liberty. 

Urban Crime Spike “the Most Overlooked U.S. Crime Story in Recent Years”

News  

Monday, October 20, 2025

Urban Crime Spike “the Most Overlooked U.S. Crime Story in Recent Years”

It was a standard talking point of the Biden White House that violent crime had dropped by record levels under the Biden-Harris administration, attributed in part to its support of gun control measures.

David Hogg: “The Grift that Keeps on Grifting”

News  

Monday, October 20, 2025

David Hogg: “The Grift that Keeps on Grifting”

At this point, anybody who reads NRA-ILA’s Grassroots Alerts even sporadically is well aware of the shameless, anti-gun self-promoter David Hogg. 

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging California’s Glock Ban

Monday, October 13, 2025

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging California’s Glock Ban

Today, the National Rifle Association—along with Firearms Policy Coalition, Second Amendment Foundation, Poway Weapons & Gear, and two NRA members—filed a lawsuit challenging California’s Glock ban.

Colorado Joins States in Promoting Use of Red Flag Laws

News  

Monday, October 20, 2025

Colorado Joins States in Promoting Use of Red Flag Laws

First there were the red flag laws themselves, dangerous laws allowing for the seizure of firearms while bypassing a citizen’s right to due process. 

North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Last week the North Carolina General Assembly briefly returned from recess and re-referred Senate Bill 50, Freedom to Carry NC, to the House Rules Committee.

Massachusetts: Hunting Ammunition Restrictions on Agenda for Committee Hearing Tomorrow

Monday, October 20, 2025

Massachusetts: Hunting Ammunition Restrictions on Agenda for Committee Hearing Tomorrow

On Tuesday, October 21st, the Joint Committee on Environment and Natural Resources will hold a hearing on dozens of hunting-related bills, including two bills aiming to restrict ammunition. 

First Affirmative Lawsuit in Support of Gun Owners Filed by Trump’s DOJ

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

First Affirmative Lawsuit in Support of Gun Owners Filed by Trump’s DOJ

California officials’ egregious foot-dragging over the issuance of carry permits has finally attracted the ire of the federal Department of Justice (DOJ). 

Maine: Republicans and Democrats Agree, Red Flag is BAD for Maine

Monday, October 20, 2025

Maine: Republicans and Democrats Agree, Red Flag is BAD for Maine

We are only 15 DAYS out from Election Day, have you made your plan to vote NO on Question 2?

FBI Persists in Underreporting Armed Citizen Defensive Gun Use

News  

Monday, October 13, 2025

FBI Persists in Underreporting Armed Citizen Defensive Gun Use

Three years ago, Dr. John Lott of the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC), writing for RealClearInvestigations, described how the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was vastly undercounting, “by an order of more than three the number of instances in ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.