Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

VPC Recycles Old Campaign Against .50 Caliber Rifles

Monday, March 17, 2025

VPC Recycles Old Campaign Against .50 Caliber Rifles

It’s been some time since we have talked about one of the oldest, most extreme anti-gun organizations, the Violence Policy Center (VPC).  Back in 2022, we noted the organization wanted then-president Joe Biden’s administration to reclassify millions of handguns, such as Glocks and others of similar design, as machineguns.  The justification was that, since some criminals have illegally converted some of these semi-automatic firearms to fire as fully-automatic (i.e., machineguns), all such firearms should be classified as machineguns.

Even Joe Biden (or whoever was in charge at the time), arguably the most anti-gun president in the history of our great nation, seemed to think that idea was too crazy to consider.  Had he or his handlers followed the VPC’s suggestion, it would have turned millions of previously legal handguns into contraband, as machineguns must be taxed and registered under the National Firearms Act (NFA), but federal law also prohibits the general public from transferring or possessing any machineguns not registered by May 19, 1986. 

Considering VPC supports banning the possession of all handguns by any civilian, it was not surprising to see the organization look to blame and punish law-abiding gun owners for the actions of a few violent criminals in an effort to advance its gun-ban agenda.

Now VPC is taking a similar approach, but this time the group is going after .50 caliber rifles.

A “similar approach” may be underselling this effort, as it is really the exact same approach; almost as if VPC ran a search-and-replace program, jettisoning “Glock” for “.50 caliber rifle.”  Just as with Glocks and similar designed handguns, VPC wants to reclassify .50 caliber rifles under the NFA.  They also want to ban the future production and sale of these rifles for civilians.

This comes as part of the recent release of a VPC “study” intended to vilify .50 caliber rifles.  But the “study” exposes itself as little more than anti-gun propaganda with its opening statement:

“It is indisputable that the majority of firearms recovered in Mexico, and in particular from Mexican organized criminal organizations, originate in the United States.”

The image VPC is trying to manufacture is that our firearms industry and U.S. gun laws are somehow responsible for the violent mayhem committed south of our border by these “Mexican organized criminal organizations.” This, of course, is exactly what the government of Mexico is claiming in a case that was recently before the U.S. Supreme Court. A broad cross-section of the justices seemed unpersuaded by Mexico’s arguments. 

VPC goes so far as to imply that the “U.S. gun market…compels that traffic….”  These anti-gun extremists even blame “the gun industry’s design choices,” a charge that sounds like gun makers are basing their developments on what might appeal to criminals, rather than the law-abiding gun owners that actually make up their clientele. These outlandish claims were also pushed by Mexico in its suit.

The “study” is ladened with anti-gun editorializing, like claiming firearms have become “more lethal” with “more killing power.”  It uses words invented by anti-gun organizations that are designed to frighten and confuse the general public, like “pocket rockets,” “assault weapons,” and “assault pistols.”  (“Assault weapons” is a term the VPC’s own Josh Sugarmann promoted specifically because it was intentionally confusing.) 

The “study” also offers anecdotal evidence—often lacking key supportive information or including misinformation—to promote the latest (actually, rehashed) effort to attack a specific type of firearm.

“By far the most powerful and deadly innovation available in the civilian marketplace today is the 50 caliber anti-armor sniper rifle.”

This is the breathtaking transition to the VPC’s specific diatribe against rifles capable of chambering the .50 BMG round.  This “innovation” was developed around the turn of the century.  Not this century, but the previous one.  In other words, the .50 BMG round has been available for civilian use for more than 100 years.

If the fact that these rounds have been around longer than sliced bread isn’t enough to expose the VPC’s lie that this is some sort of new “deadly innovation,” this very report admits the fact that the VPC first started railing against these guns three decades ago, in “the 1990s and early 2000s.”  At that time, VPC claimed allowing civilians to buy these firearms “posed a ‘serious threat to American national security.’”

This new “report” seems to admit that the previous “warning” failed to advance the VPC’s anti-gun policy goals, forcing it to “pivot” (their word) from the unwarranted fear over criminals and terrorists using these guns on American soil to the use by “Mexican cartels and other criminals in the Caribbean and Latin American regions.”

Decades after being unable to invent a proper fear-nexus between .50 BMG rifles and terrorists, the “pivot” to “Mexican cartels” (they never expound on “other criminals in the Caribbean and Latin American regions”) should be met with the same lack of success.

In any case, suggestions about the number or percentage of firearms in Mexico traced back to U.S. origins should be regarded with suspicion, given that Mexico’s government is hoping to leverage these accusations into a $10 billion payday from the U.S. firearms industry. ATF’s tracing system, after all, is designed to work only with firearms that have U.S. markings, whether from domestic manufacture or importation. This says nothing, however, about firearms recovered in Mexico that aren’t traced.

Furthermore, a recent article from America’s First Freedom notes that some experts point to cartel firearms as having been “illegally manufactured,” coming from “other parts of Latin America, Eastern Europe, Russia and China,” or even being supplied by “corrupt Mexican military officials.”

The article also states that a 2022 U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) report highlights that guns used by cartels often come from Central and South America, where old military stockpiles are looted and resold.

But to promote its anti-.50 BMG message, VPC runs through a short list of crimes committed in Mexico involving firearms, including .50 BMG rifles.  The crimes were all committed, presumably, by people associated with cartels.  Six of the “supporting” documents of these crimes come from Mexican media sources, and using online translation, none of them appear to claim to know how any of the firearms, including the .50 BMG rifles, were acquired.

There are seven “supporting” documents that are in English, with only two that link the acquisition of firearms to sources in the U.S.

One article, from Vice, reads like an anti-gun editorial, with quotes from the anti-gun Giffords Law Center.  That article is linked as supporting evidence to a case where a .50 BMG rifle was used in a crime, but where it came from is unknown.  The article does, however, mention a separate case where firearms that showed up in Mexico were traced back to an individual in the U.S. who was charged, pleaded guilty, and was sentenced to jail and a $9,500.00 fine.  This is mentioned after the Giffords representative tried to imply more laws were needed to go after people who illegally traffic firearms.

One of the other sources that does not claim to know how the alleged cartel operatives acquired the firearms in the case to which it is linked is the notorious anti-gun propaganda mill The Trace, funded by notoriously anti-gun billionaire Michael Bloomberg.  Interestingly, this article alleges that the .50 BMG rifles “[o]ften” come from the U.S., rather than claiming the U.S. is the primary source.  Also of note is that the article admits “many Mexican public authorities are widely known to be corrupt,” implying that a major source of cartel guns are, in fact, Mexican officials.

A third article, from the Daily Mail in the UK, has a likely intentionally misleading headline: “American-made rifle that fires between 400 to 600 bullets per minute seized from gang linked to cartel faction operated by El Chapo’s sons.”  That is followed by several bullet-points referring to a .50 caliber rifle that was among the seized guns.  But the article then refers to the .50 caliber rifle as being semi-automatic, which would not come even close to the ability to fire at the rate claimed in the headline.  The article even has a quote from a security expert who notes the gun “is not a repetition weapon, but rather a precision one.”

Besides these 15 incidents spanning more than a decade-and-a-half, VPC also rehashes some of its earlier attacks on the .50 BMG.  The organization has put out at least nine different publications attacking .50 caliber rifles, many of which detail “potential threats” that never seem to materialize.  There was the previously mentioned general warning about the widespread use of these rifles by terrorists here in America that never happened.

Then there are specific “threats” they have “studied” about the use of these rifles by terrorists and criminals in America against specific targets, like aircraft and industrial complexes.  Again, no examples of such “threats” are presented.  If anything, VPC publications read more like a hypothetical training manual for future terrorists.

The latest “study” rehashes the old “warnings” about using .50 caliber rifles against aircraft, then “documents” three incidents in Mexico, spanning about a decade, where it is believed (but not proven) that such rifles were used.  One incident involved a helicopter being brought down, another involved an attack on a helicopter that resulted in no injuries reported, and a third involved a “Mexican military light aircraft” that was fired upon, but not, apparently, hit.

It is probably apparent to most reading this article that actually hitting a fixed wing aircraft flying at least hundreds of feet, if not over a thousand, with a semi-automatic rifle—.50 caliber or otherwise—is more a matter of luck than skill.  While the .50 BMG has been used as an anti-aircraft round for planes in flight, it is always coupled with full-auto military weaponry.

VPC augments its “report” with a handful of pictures, one of which seems to be a cartel social media post, so the origin of that .50 caliber rifle cannot be determined.  The other two photos show caches of arms seized by Mexican authorities.  One (apparently from the previously mentioned Daily Mail article) shows what appears to be a single .50 caliber rifle mixed in with dozens of other items, including what looks like a belt-fed machinegun (along with ammo belts), what appear to be several grenades, and at least one firearm equipped with what may be a grenade launcher.  Several other long guns are in the picture, some of which could very well be full-auto.

If cartels can acquire belt-fed machineguns, grenades, and grenade launchers—all of which are already either prohibited for civilian use or subject to NFA control—why would VPC think adding .50 caliber rifles to NFA restrictions, as they suggest, stop cartels from acquiring them?

Ultimately, this “study,” like every other VPC “study,” is little more than anti-gun fear mongering designed to advance the organization’s gun-ban agenda.  Near the end, where it makes policy recommendations, it is mentioned that .50 caliber rifles should be removed from the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA).  That should come as no surprise, as VPC is supporting the lawsuit Mexico filed against several American gun manufacturers.

The skepticism with which the Supreme Court greeted that lawsuit should also be exercised by anyone reading VPC’s .50 BMG “report.”

TRENDING NOW
Baltimore Gets Serious on Crime Control, and the Results Speak for Themselves

News  

Monday, July 14, 2025

Baltimore Gets Serious on Crime Control, and the Results Speak for Themselves

As the mid-year mark of 2025 hits, a promising report on crime trends has come out of the City of Baltimore. Surprising news at first glance until you dig deeper into the policy direction the ...

U.K. Moves to Legally De-suppress Suppressors

News  

Monday, July 14, 2025

U.K. Moves to Legally De-suppress Suppressors

On July 4th, President Donald Trump signed into law his “One Big Beautiful Bill,” which included a provision that eliminated the tax stamp fee of $200, but did not deregulate suppressors under the National Firearms ...

President Trump Supports Hunting and Resource Protection with Executive Actions

News  

Monday, July 14, 2025

President Trump Supports Hunting and Resource Protection with Executive Actions

Just as the United States was preparing to celebrate 249 beautiful years, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order on July 3rd establishing the “Make America Beautiful Again" Commission supporting hunters, outdoorsmen, and outdoor recreationists by prioritizing the ...

Legacy Media Finally Acknowledges Politization of Public Health

News  

Monday, July 14, 2025

Legacy Media Finally Acknowledges Politization of Public Health

It appears the editors of The Atlantic are finally willing to entertain an idea that has long been obvious to gun rights supporters.

House Annual Appropriations Process Update

News  

Monday, July 14, 2025

House Annual Appropriations Process Update

As the House Appropriations Committee is putting together legislation to fund the government, NRA-ILA has worked closely with policy makers to ensure several long-standing priorities for gun owners were included in the underlying bills.

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

News  

Second Amendment  

Thursday, May 22, 2025

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

Earlier today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R.1 the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which included Section 2 of the Hearing Protection Act, completely removing suppressors from the National Firearms Act (NFA).

DOJ Declines to Seek Supreme Court Review of Decision Striking Down Federal Laws Prohibiting FFLs From Selling Handguns to 18-to-20-Year-Olds

Thursday, July 10, 2025

DOJ Declines to Seek Supreme Court Review of Decision Striking Down Federal Laws Prohibiting FFLs From Selling Handguns to 18-to-20-Year-Olds

In Reese v. ATF, the Fifth Circuit held that 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(b)(1) and (c)(1)—which together forbid Federal Firearms Licensees from selling handguns to 18-to-20-year-olds—violate the Second Amendment.

Florida: Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday Signed by Governor

Monday, July 7, 2025

Florida: Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday Signed by Governor

Governor Ron DeSantis recently signed the Florida Budget for Fiscal Year 2025–2026, which includes a Second Amendment sales tax holiday from September 8 through December 31, 2025. The NRA is thankful for Governor DeSantis’ strong ...

NRA-ILA July 2025 Litigation Update

Thursday, July 10, 2025

NRA-ILA July 2025 Litigation Update

In the second quarter of 2025, the National Rifle Association filed two cert petitions in the U.S. Supreme Court and five amicus briefs, while continuing to litigate dozens of ongoing lawsuits across the country.

Maine: Lawmakers Call for Anti-2A Progressive Professor to Be Fired

Tuesday, July 8, 2025

Maine: Lawmakers Call for Anti-2A Progressive Professor to Be Fired

In case you missed the media firestorm last week, a progressive professor at Eastern Maine Community College in Bangor, Maine, has come under fire for her emails belittling a student for her religious beliefs and views ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.