Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Washington Post Gets It Almost Right About Restoration of Second Amendment Rights

Monday, March 17, 2025

Washington Post Gets It Almost Right About Restoration of Second Amendment Rights

Last week brought yet another installment in the ongoing saga of The Washington Post’s (WAPO) pivot toward “individual liberties and free markets” in its opinion section. This time, WAPO published an editorial by two law professors who argue the government should resume funding a provision of federal law that allows the U.S. attorney general (AG) to grant relief from federal firearm disabilities on a case-by-case basis.

That authority remains on the books but has been inactive since1991, when the firearm prohibitionists at the Violence Policy Center released a “report” claiming some individuals granted relief later reoffended. Congress responded to the report by passing language in bills funding the ATF, the agency within the Department of Justice (DOJ) the AG had chosen to process the petitions, prohibiting use of any funds for that purpose.

The issue is now back in the news because the Trump DOJ recently began reviewing petitions under the statute through the Office of the Pardon Attorney. This was a clever way to get around the funding rider, which by its terms applies to ATF, not all of DOJ (the WAPO article gets that particular detail wrong). Recent news reports indicate a former attorney within that office is now claiming she was fired because she refused to recommend that actor Mel Gibson be granted restoration. The basis for Gibson’s federal firearms disability is a 2011 conviction that fell under the heading of a “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence,” one of about a dozen categories of events that trigger a presumptive lifetime ban on firearm possession.

The professors admit that the categories include people who, especially over time, would not be demonstrably dangerous and who's ongoing Second Amendment prohibitions would likely not survive scrutiny under recent U.S. Supreme Court caselaw. On those points, at least, they are correct.

But they also believe the availability of relief might insulate these admittedly over-broad categories from further constitutional challenge. Thus, while they speculate that making relief available “is likely to lead to a handful of fatalities,” it’s better than the alternative of “[t]housand[s] more people … d[ying] each year if the Supreme Court strikes down wholesale the possession prohibitions … .”

Without belaboring the point, this melodramatic analysis overestimates the value of the federal scheme of prohibited persons and mandatory background checks for retail firearm purchases, which is routinely ignored and circumvented by the highest-risk offenders.

To be clear, NRA-ILA supports a mechanism for prohibited persons to petition for relief from firearm disabilities. And it seems the Trump administration has found a workable legal route for that process, even if DOJ employees might be prone to err on the side of denial. That at least is as positive start.

We disagree, however, that the ability to petition for relief somehow excuses over-broad, ahistorical prohibited person categories for which there is no similar precedent dating back to the founding era, as Supreme Court precedent requires.

Properly construed, that precedent also requires the government to carry the burden of proof in the first instance that a person who is prohibited from firearm possession poses an enhanced risk of physical harm to self or others. The scheme the professors contemplate shifts that burden to the individual who was unconstitutionally deprived of his or her rights. That is a violation of due process, something law professors used to (at least) believe was important.

One reason unconstitutional, over-broad prohibited person categories found their way into American law is because the legal elite of the 20th Century promoted the false “consensus view” that the Second Amendment didn’t protect individual rights at all. That view, and the gun controllers’ fallback position that Second Amendment rights could be subordinated to states’ rote, unsubstantiated assertions of the public safety imperative of their laws, have been repudiated by the high court. This should lead to a long overdue reckoning.

We commend the Trump administration for its proactive approach to this important issue and wish Mr. Gibson well in his own attempt to obtain restoration. We know of no fundamental civil right other than the Second Amendment that is permanently lost for a misdemeanor conviction.  

We also encourage WAPO to continue these experiments in advocating for Second Amendment rights. Maybe, in time, they’ll figure it out.

TRENDING NOW
Anti-gun Lawmakers Attempt to Ban Essential Second Amendment Arms

News  

Monday, May 5, 2025

Anti-gun Lawmakers Attempt to Ban Essential Second Amendment Arms

On April 30, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) introduced the so-called “Assault Weapons Ban of 2025.” Picking up where his predecessor Dianne Feinstein left off, Schiff’s legislation would ban commonly-owned semi-automatic firearms, such as the AR-15.

Partisan Due Process Renaissance Excludes American Gun Owners

News  

Monday, May 5, 2025

Partisan Due Process Renaissance Excludes American Gun Owners

An observer of American political discourse can’t go anywhere these days without being bombarded by reproachful references to the importance of “due process.”

Kansas Supreme Court Enforces PLCAA in High Profile Case

News  

Monday, May 5, 2025

Kansas Supreme Court Enforces PLCAA in High Profile Case

Last week, the Kansas Supreme Court upheld a significant district court dismissal in Johnson v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC, deciding that Bass Pro Outdoor World and Beretta USA/Beretta Italy cannot be sued by a man who ...

Not Your Father’s DOJ: Government Actively Backs Second Amendment in Litigation

News  

Monday, May 5, 2025

Not Your Father’s DOJ: Government Actively Backs Second Amendment in Litigation

It has, in theory, always been the sworn duty of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to uphold the constitutional rights of American citizens and to affirmatively protect fundamental liberties. 

UPDATE: Legislation Introduced to Protect Veterans’ Second Amendment Rights

News  

Monday, May 5, 2025

UPDATE: Legislation Introduced to Protect Veterans’ Second Amendment Rights

The Chairmen of the House and Senate Committees on Veterans’ Affairs, U.S. Representative Mike Bost (R-IL-12) and Senator Jerry Moran (R-KS), as well as Senator John Kennedy (R-LA), have reintroduced the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act ...

Rep. Sheri Biggs Introduces Bill to Ease Shotgun Purchases

News  

Thursday, May 1, 2025

Rep. Sheri Biggs Introduces Bill to Ease Shotgun Purchases

On April 28, 2025, Representative Sheri Biggs (R-SC-03) reintroduced the No Frivolous Applications for Short-Barreled Shotguns (NFA SBS) Act (H.R. 3034). This legislation removes short-barreled shotguns from the National Firearms Act so that they will be treated ...

Trump Administration Revives Federal Firearm Rights Restoration Provision

News  

Friday, March 21, 2025

Trump Administration Revives Federal Firearm Rights Restoration Provision

On March 20, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) published an interim final rule entitled, Withdrawing the Attorney General’s Delegation of Authority. That bland title belies the historic nature of the measure, which is aimed at reviving ...

I’d Like a McHurry, Please, with a Side of No Time to Spare

News  

Monday, May 5, 2025

I’d Like a McHurry, Please, with a Side of No Time to Spare

Market research indicates that most adults (42%) who eat at McDonald’s and similar fast-food restaurants expect to receive their food within a maximum of five minutes after ordering, while for seven percent of respondents, the “fast” in ...

Illinois Appellate Court Upholds FOID Act in NRA-Backed Challenge

Thursday, May 1, 2025

Illinois Appellate Court Upholds FOID Act in NRA-Backed Challenge

Under the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act (FOID Act), Illinois requires a license and imposes fees to acquire and possess firearms.

Rep. Sheri Biggs Introduces Legislation to Ensure Ability to Ship Firearms

News  

Thursday, May 1, 2025

Rep. Sheri Biggs Introduces Legislation to Ensure Ability to Ship Firearms

On April 28, 2025, Representative Sheri Biggs (R-SC-03) introduced the Protecting the Mailing of Firearms Act (H.R. 3033). This legislation will remove the arbitrary prohibition on the mailing of handguns and ammunition via the United States Postal ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.