Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Washington Post Gets It Almost Right About Restoration of Second Amendment Rights

Monday, March 17, 2025

Washington Post Gets It Almost Right About Restoration of Second Amendment Rights

Last week brought yet another installment in the ongoing saga of The Washington Post’s (WAPO) pivot toward “individual liberties and free markets” in its opinion section. This time, WAPO published an editorial by two law professors who argue the government should resume funding a provision of federal law that allows the U.S. attorney general (AG) to grant relief from federal firearm disabilities on a case-by-case basis.

That authority remains on the books but has been inactive since1991, when the firearm prohibitionists at the Violence Policy Center released a “report” claiming some individuals granted relief later reoffended. Congress responded to the report by passing language in bills funding the ATF, the agency within the Department of Justice (DOJ) the AG had chosen to process the petitions, prohibiting use of any funds for that purpose.

The issue is now back in the news because the Trump DOJ recently began reviewing petitions under the statute through the Office of the Pardon Attorney. This was a clever way to get around the funding rider, which by its terms applies to ATF, not all of DOJ (the WAPO article gets that particular detail wrong). Recent news reports indicate a former attorney within that office is now claiming she was fired because she refused to recommend that actor Mel Gibson be granted restoration. The basis for Gibson’s federal firearms disability is a 2011 conviction that fell under the heading of a “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence,” one of about a dozen categories of events that trigger a presumptive lifetime ban on firearm possession.

The professors admit that the categories include people who, especially over time, would not be demonstrably dangerous and who's ongoing Second Amendment prohibitions would likely not survive scrutiny under recent U.S. Supreme Court caselaw. On those points, at least, they are correct.

But they also believe the availability of relief might insulate these admittedly over-broad categories from further constitutional challenge. Thus, while they speculate that making relief available “is likely to lead to a handful of fatalities,” it’s better than the alternative of “[t]housand[s] more people … d[ying] each year if the Supreme Court strikes down wholesale the possession prohibitions … .”

Without belaboring the point, this melodramatic analysis overestimates the value of the federal scheme of prohibited persons and mandatory background checks for retail firearm purchases, which is routinely ignored and circumvented by the highest-risk offenders.

To be clear, NRA-ILA supports a mechanism for prohibited persons to petition for relief from firearm disabilities. And it seems the Trump administration has found a workable legal route for that process, even if DOJ employees might be prone to err on the side of denial. That at least is as positive start.

We disagree, however, that the ability to petition for relief somehow excuses over-broad, ahistorical prohibited person categories for which there is no similar precedent dating back to the founding era, as Supreme Court precedent requires.

Properly construed, that precedent also requires the government to carry the burden of proof in the first instance that a person who is prohibited from firearm possession poses an enhanced risk of physical harm to self or others. The scheme the professors contemplate shifts that burden to the individual who was unconstitutionally deprived of his or her rights. That is a violation of due process, something law professors used to (at least) believe was important.

One reason unconstitutional, over-broad prohibited person categories found their way into American law is because the legal elite of the 20th Century promoted the false “consensus view” that the Second Amendment didn’t protect individual rights at all. That view, and the gun controllers’ fallback position that Second Amendment rights could be subordinated to states’ rote, unsubstantiated assertions of the public safety imperative of their laws, have been repudiated by the high court. This should lead to a long overdue reckoning.

We commend the Trump administration for its proactive approach to this important issue and wish Mr. Gibson well in his own attempt to obtain restoration. We know of no fundamental civil right other than the Second Amendment that is permanently lost for a misdemeanor conviction.  

We also encourage WAPO to continue these experiments in advocating for Second Amendment rights. Maybe, in time, they’ll figure it out.

TRENDING NOW
Declassified Document: Biden-Harris Administration Targeted Gun Owners and Second Amendment Rights Under “Domestic Terrorism” Pretext

News  

Monday, April 21, 2025

Declassified Document: Biden-Harris Administration Targeted Gun Owners and Second Amendment Rights Under “Domestic Terrorism” Pretext

On April 16, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard made good on a promise to expose the ways in which the Biden administration had weaponized the federal government against its political adversaries by releasing the Biden-era “Strategic Implementation Plan ...

Federal Court in Massachusetts Enforces Range Access Statute in Pathbreaking Case

News  

Monday, April 21, 2025

Federal Court in Massachusetts Enforces Range Access Statute in Pathbreaking Case

It has happened before in Massachusetts: A small, hardy band of armed Americans faces off against elements of the most powerful military in the world and commits a revolutionary act that paves the way for ...

DOJ Drops Controversial NFA Charge Against Pardoned Jan. 6 Protestor

News  

Monday, April 21, 2025

DOJ Drops Controversial NFA Charge Against Pardoned Jan. 6 Protestor

Last February, NRA-ILA’s reporting exposed the case of Taylor Taranto, a pardoned January 6 protestor separately arrested on firearm charges in Washington, D.C. 

Trump Administration Revives Federal Firearm Rights Restoration Provision

News  

Friday, March 21, 2025

Trump Administration Revives Federal Firearm Rights Restoration Provision

On March 20, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) published an interim final rule entitled, Withdrawing the Attorney General’s Delegation of Authority. That bland title belies the historic nature of the measure, which is aimed at reviving ...

Germany Strips “Extremist” AfD Members, Supporters of Gun Licenses, Guns

News  

Monday, April 14, 2025

Germany Strips “Extremist” AfD Members, Supporters of Gun Licenses, Guns

It’s been only a few years since the San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed a resolution calling the NRA a “domestic terrorist organization.” 

Canadian Appeals Court Upholds 2020 Gun Bans – “Reasonable” and “Rationally Connected to a Legitimate Objective”

News  

Monday, April 21, 2025

Canadian Appeals Court Upholds 2020 Gun Bans – “Reasonable” and “Rationally Connected to a Legitimate Objective”

On March 9, when Mark Carney was selected to replace Justin Trudeau as Canada’s Prime Minister and the new Liberal Party leader, he ignored the opportunity the situation presented to jettison his predecessor’s useless and expensive “assault-style ...

Trump DOJ Creates Second Amendment Task Force to Undo Damage of Biden Era

News  

Monday, April 14, 2025

Trump DOJ Creates Second Amendment Task Force to Undo Damage of Biden Era

Last week, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) formally announced the creation of a Second Amendment Task Force with Attorney General Pam Bondi declaring, “It is the policy of the Department of Justice to use its full ...

Vermont: Committee Approves Burlington Gun Ban

Monday, April 21, 2025

Vermont: Committee Approves Burlington Gun Ban

On Friday, April 18, the Vermont Senate Government Operations Committee approved S. 131, a change to the Burlington City Charter that would allow the city to ban firearms in establishments that serve alcohol.

Legal Update: April 2025 Litigation Update

Monday, April 21, 2025

Legal Update: April 2025 Litigation Update

In the first quarter of 2025, the National Rifle Association filed three new lawsuits and five amicus briefs, while continuing to litigate dozens of ongoing lawsuits across the country.

Washington: Permit to Purchase Bill Passes Senate

Tuesday, April 15, 2025

Washington: Permit to Purchase Bill Passes Senate

On Monday, April 14th, the Senate passed House Bill 1163, the permit-to-purchase scheme, along party lines. It will now return to the House for concurrence with amendments made in the Senate. NRA members must urge ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.