Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Washington Post Gets It Almost Right About Restoration of Second Amendment Rights

Monday, March 17, 2025

Washington Post Gets It Almost Right About Restoration of Second Amendment Rights

Last week brought yet another installment in the ongoing saga of The Washington Post’s (WAPO) pivot toward “individual liberties and free markets” in its opinion section. This time, WAPO published an editorial by two law professors who argue the government should resume funding a provision of federal law that allows the U.S. attorney general (AG) to grant relief from federal firearm disabilities on a case-by-case basis.

That authority remains on the books but has been inactive since1991, when the firearm prohibitionists at the Violence Policy Center released a “report” claiming some individuals granted relief later reoffended. Congress responded to the report by passing language in bills funding the ATF, the agency within the Department of Justice (DOJ) the AG had chosen to process the petitions, prohibiting use of any funds for that purpose.

The issue is now back in the news because the Trump DOJ recently began reviewing petitions under the statute through the Office of the Pardon Attorney. This was a clever way to get around the funding rider, which by its terms applies to ATF, not all of DOJ (the WAPO article gets that particular detail wrong). Recent news reports indicate a former attorney within that office is now claiming she was fired because she refused to recommend that actor Mel Gibson be granted restoration. The basis for Gibson’s federal firearms disability is a 2011 conviction that fell under the heading of a “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence,” one of about a dozen categories of events that trigger a presumptive lifetime ban on firearm possession.

The professors admit that the categories include people who, especially over time, would not be demonstrably dangerous and who's ongoing Second Amendment prohibitions would likely not survive scrutiny under recent U.S. Supreme Court caselaw. On those points, at least, they are correct.

But they also believe the availability of relief might insulate these admittedly over-broad categories from further constitutional challenge. Thus, while they speculate that making relief available “is likely to lead to a handful of fatalities,” it’s better than the alternative of “[t]housand[s] more people … d[ying] each year if the Supreme Court strikes down wholesale the possession prohibitions … .”

Without belaboring the point, this melodramatic analysis overestimates the value of the federal scheme of prohibited persons and mandatory background checks for retail firearm purchases, which is routinely ignored and circumvented by the highest-risk offenders.

To be clear, NRA-ILA supports a mechanism for prohibited persons to petition for relief from firearm disabilities. And it seems the Trump administration has found a workable legal route for that process, even if DOJ employees might be prone to err on the side of denial. That at least is as positive start.

We disagree, however, that the ability to petition for relief somehow excuses over-broad, ahistorical prohibited person categories for which there is no similar precedent dating back to the founding era, as Supreme Court precedent requires.

Properly construed, that precedent also requires the government to carry the burden of proof in the first instance that a person who is prohibited from firearm possession poses an enhanced risk of physical harm to self or others. The scheme the professors contemplate shifts that burden to the individual who was unconstitutionally deprived of his or her rights. That is a violation of due process, something law professors used to (at least) believe was important.

One reason unconstitutional, over-broad prohibited person categories found their way into American law is because the legal elite of the 20th Century promoted the false “consensus view” that the Second Amendment didn’t protect individual rights at all. That view, and the gun controllers’ fallback position that Second Amendment rights could be subordinated to states’ rote, unsubstantiated assertions of the public safety imperative of their laws, have been repudiated by the high court. This should lead to a long overdue reckoning.

We commend the Trump administration for its proactive approach to this important issue and wish Mr. Gibson well in his own attempt to obtain restoration. We know of no fundamental civil right other than the Second Amendment that is permanently lost for a misdemeanor conviction.  

We also encourage WAPO to continue these experiments in advocating for Second Amendment rights. Maybe, in time, they’ll figure it out.

TRENDING NOW
U.S. Court of Appeals Backtracks on Adverse Suppressor Ruling

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

U.S. Court of Appeals Backtracks on Adverse Suppressor Ruling

In a single sentence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit added to the high-profile and consequential national conversation on firearm suppressors.

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

News  

Second Amendment  

Thursday, May 22, 2025

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

Earlier today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R.1 the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which included Section 2 of the Hearing Protection Act, completely removing suppressors from the National Firearms Act (NFA).

Minnesota: Shotgun-Only Hunting Zones Repealed

Friday, June 20, 2025

Minnesota: Shotgun-Only Hunting Zones Repealed

On Monday, June 9th, outside of regular session, the Senate passed the Environment Omnibus bill, removing shotgun-only hunting zones in the state. 

Switched Off: A Case Study on Minnesota’s Illegal Machine Gun Law

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

Switched Off: A Case Study on Minnesota’s Illegal Machine Gun Law

There’s been a lot of noise of late about auto sears or so-called “Glock switches” – devices to convert a semiautomatic firearm into an automatic weapon. 

2A News Out of New Jersey You Won’t Believe: It’s Actually a Good Thing!

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

2A News Out of New Jersey You Won’t Believe: It’s Actually a Good Thing!

The Garden State is not where most seek positive developments regarding our right to arms, so we were pleasantly surprised when Englishtown, N.J., recently made a move to support the Second Amendment.

North Carolina: Update on Gun Bills Moving through the General Assembly

Tuesday, June 24, 2025

North Carolina: Update on Gun Bills Moving through the General Assembly

Recently, House Bill 193 (H193) was reported favorably out of both the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Rules Committee, with amendments.

Update: Washington Post Fact Checks Misleading Ad Council “Children” and Firearms Talking Point

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

Update: Washington Post Fact Checks Misleading Ad Council “Children” and Firearms Talking Point

Last week, NRA-ILA explained how a recent public service announcement campaign from the federally-funded Ad Council, and the gun control lobby more broadly, manipulates statistics to create misleading talking points about “children” and firearms.

DOJ Files Amicus Brief Supporting NRA-Backed Challenge to IL’s Ban on “Assault Weapons” and “Large-Capacity Magazines”

Tuesday, June 17, 2025

DOJ Files Amicus Brief Supporting NRA-Backed Challenge to IL’s Ban on “Assault Weapons” and “Large-Capacity Magazines”

Last Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice filed an amicus brief in the Seventh Circuit supporting an NRA-backed challenge to Illinois’s prohibition on so-called “assault weapons” and “large-capacity magazines.”

Ninth Circuit Strikes Down CA’s One-Gun-A-Month Law

Friday, June 20, 2025

Ninth Circuit Strikes Down CA’s One-Gun-A-Month Law

Today, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that California’s law prohibiting people from buying more than one firearm in a 30-day period violates the Second Amendment.

Intrepid Journalist Tracks Down Truth About “Children” and Firearms, While Public Health Researchers Downplay Inconvenient Realities

News  

Monday, June 16, 2025

Intrepid Journalist Tracks Down Truth About “Children” and Firearms, While Public Health Researchers Downplay Inconvenient Realities

For decades, gun control advocates and their allies in “public health” have pushed a misleading factoid about children and firearms.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.