Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Legacy Media Finally Acknowledges Politization of Public Health

Monday, July 14, 2025

Legacy Media Finally Acknowledges Politization of Public Health

It appears the editors of The Atlantic are finally willing to entertain an idea that has long been obvious to gun rights supporters. In this case, it’s that the field of “public health” has devolved from a scientific pursuit into a left-wing political project.

On July 7, the lofty periodical published an item titled “How Public Health Discredited Itself,” by John Tierney. Using the field’s woeful, and contradictory, response to the COVID pandemic as a jumping-off point, the former Boston College professor explained how the field had gone astray well before 2020.

Referring to public health, Tierney noted,

A noble profession has been corrupted by politics. This became obvious during the pandemic, but the politicization of the discipline has been going on for half a century. The modern field has redefined the very meaning of public health, and in the process, it has made so many mistakes that it has itself become a hazard to Americans’ health.

The professor explained how public health was initially “focused on threats that were genuinely public” and required collective action. This included reducing the spread of communicable diseases like smallpox and cholera through public education campaigns and the construction of sanitation infrastructure.

However, as Tierney pointed out, “the distinction between public and personal health began disappearing in the 1960s,” leading the field into dictating all manner of personal and political conduct. Detailing the shift, he noted,

Over the ensuing decades, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, founded in the 1940s to stop the spread of malaria, enlarged its portfolio to address epidemics of tobacco use, firearm fatalities, domestic violence, and racism. The American Public Health Association began campaigning to regulate products it deemed unhealthy, and went on to support income redistribution, nationalized health care, increases to the minimum wage, green energy, and transgender rights.

Citing earlier work by a pair of economists, the author explained,

The field’s transformation was summarized in the title of a book published in 2000 by the economists James T. Bennett and Thomas J. DiLorenzo: From Pathology to Politics. “To a very large extent,” the authors concluded, “the public health movement has increasingly become a collection of liberal ideologies cloaked in the language and garb of health science.”

Tierney is right.

Today, much of the “public health” field is concerned with empowering government to dictate an ever-expanding array of individual behavior, including what people can eat, drink, read, think, drive, and how to protect yourself and your family. The bulk of the project is fundamentally opposed to individual liberty. All the while, Americans are assured that it’s necessary for an ever-growing amount of taxpayer resources to be devoted to public health “experts” studying and implementing these efforts. It doesn’t take a public choice theorist to understand how these incentives work to create a feedback loop.

Moreover, as NRA-ILA and Reason magazine have routinely pointed out, the field is rife with junk science.

It's encouraging that some in the legacy press are now waking up to the reality of public health, but NRA-ILA has been covering this issue for four decades – in particular, the efforts of the CDC.

In a 1993 item for the American Rifleman titled “CDC Report Calls for Gun Registration,” NRA reported on the CDC’s “Injury Control in the 1990s: A National Plan for Action.” Prepared with the participation of gun control group Handgun Control, Inc. (now Brady) using dubious anti-gun research as justification, the “public health” document called for “a national waiting period for all purchases of firearms,” “new legislative and regulatory efforts” to “prohibit the manufacture, importation, and sale of handguns,” handgun registration and gun owner licensing.

A February 1994 American Rifleman article titled “Gun Control Is Bad Medicine” detailed the American Medical Association and American Academy of Pediatrics’ support for gun control, including the Brady bill.

A June 1996 American Rifleman article titled, “The Clinton War on Gun Owners,” addressed the anti-gun efforts of the CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. The piece explained, “The Clinton Administration has greatly energized efforts to frame violence as a public health rather than a criminal justice issue. To Clintonites, especially those at the taxpayer-funded Centers for Disease Control, guns are germs and gun owners the new ‘Typhoid Marys.’”

Further, the NRA item quoted CDC NCIPC Director Mark Rosenberg, who had told the Washington Post, “We need to revolutionize the way we look at guns, like what we did with cigarettes. It used to be that smoking was a glamour symbol – cool, sexy, macho. Now it is dirty, deadly – and banned.”

Also quoting a former CDC official, the piece stated,

A former CDC official Donald P. Francis noted during the Clinton Administration’s first year, the CDC’s efforts are “often dictated by what those in Washington felt were politically correct rather than what was best for the American people.” The CDC has, Francis said, “lost sight of its role as an advocate for the public’s health” and become a “servant of politicians.”

Later that year, the U.S. Congress recognized CDC’s politicization and enacted the Dickey Amendment. That measure prohibits the CDC from using federal funds for gun control advocacy.

The Dickey Amendment dampened some of the most overt federal public health anti-gun activism. However, in recent years the federal government has once again become more blatant about treating firearms as a “public health” issue.

In 2022, in the midst of an actual public health crisis, Biden CDC Director Rochelle Walensky told CNN that the agency was getting back into the politically-fraught world of gun-violence-research. In June 2024, Biden Surgeon General Vivek Murthy issued a gun control advocacy document titled, “Firearm Violence: A Public Health Crisis in America” – a warmed-over compilation of gun control talking points and policy positions. Later that year, in a list of executive gun control actions, the Biden administration encouraged states to use Medicaid dollars “to pay a health care provider for counseling parents and caregivers on firearm safety.”

To illustrate just how ridiculous things are with “public health” and firearms, the federal government has even attempted to conscript dentists into the gun control fight. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ National Institutes of Health recently used tax dollars to fund research attempting to link violence perpetrated with firearms to poor dental health. Another NIH-funded “study” called for dentists to unnecessarily inquire about their patients’ gun ownership and lecture them about firearm storage practices.

It's encouraging that a legacy publication like The Atlantic finally appears willing to acknowledge that a purportedly scientific field, that relies on government for much of its resources, has predictably would up being a partisan project to aggrandize the state. In the immortal, sarcastic, and much-memed words of Die Hard’s Officer John McClane: “Welcome to the party, pal.”

TRENDING NOW
North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Last week the North Carolina General Assembly briefly returned from recess and re-referred Senate Bill 50, Freedom to Carry NC, to the House Rules Committee.

Federal Court Strikes Down Biden Administration’s “Engaged in the Business” Rule in NRA Case

Thursday, October 2, 2025

Federal Court Strikes Down Biden Administration’s “Engaged in the Business” Rule in NRA Case

Yesterday, in Butler v. Bondi, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama held that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives exceeded its statutory authority by issuing its 2024 Final Rule expanding ...

First Affirmative Lawsuit in Support of Gun Owners Filed by Trump’s DOJ

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

First Affirmative Lawsuit in Support of Gun Owners Filed by Trump’s DOJ

California officials’ egregious foot-dragging over the issuance of carry permits has finally attracted the ire of the federal Department of Justice (DOJ). 

President Trump’s GOP Leads Polling on Crime and Guns, To No Surprise

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

President Trump’s GOP Leads Polling on Crime and Guns, To No Surprise

A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll revealed that Americans know the President Donald Trump-led Republican Party has a better plan than their Democratic Party opponents on crime and gun control.

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Fifth Circuit Case Challenging the Federal Switchblade Act

Friday, October 3, 2025

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Fifth Circuit Case Challenging the Federal Switchblade Act

Yesterday, the National Rifle Association filed an amicus brief in Knife Rights, Inc. v. Bondi, urging the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas’s decision upholding the Federal ...

Trump Administration Repeals Biden Era Firearms Export Crackdown

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

Trump Administration Repeals Biden Era Firearms Export Crackdown

Last Monday, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) at the U.S. Department of Commerce published a final rule that reversed a crackdown on the commercial export of firearms from the U.S. to other countries.

Trust in Mass Media Craters to New Lows, in Single Digits With Republicans

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

Trust in Mass Media Craters to New Lows, in Single Digits With Republicans

There’s an old saying that rings especially true to Second Amendment supporters: If you don’t read the news, you’re uninformed.

Alphabet Eases the Reins on Censorship; Will Gun Content Eventually Benefit?

News  

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

Alphabet Eases the Reins on Censorship; Will Gun Content Eventually Benefit?

With the free speech debate recently co-opted by one TV host’s use of false and incendiary remarks about his political opponents, it might have been easy to miss another important First Amendment story last week. 

Canada’s Public Safety Minister on Gun Ban & Confiscation: “Don’t Ask Me to Explain the Logic”

News  

Monday, September 29, 2025

Canada’s Public Safety Minister on Gun Ban & Confiscation: “Don’t Ask Me to Explain the Logic”

There have been multiple developments on the Canadian gun grab and ban in the last few days, but the most astounding has got to be a leaked bombshell recording of the Liberal Public Safety Minister, ...

U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Challenge to Hawaii’s Private Property Default Carry Ban

Friday, October 3, 2025

U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Challenge to Hawaii’s Private Property Default Carry Ban

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the petition for certiorari in Wolford v. Lopez, a challenge to Hawaii’s law forbidding carry on private property open to the public (such as restaurants, gas stations, and grocery stores) ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.