Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Just One More Step: Australia’s New Weapon Laws

Monday, March 24, 2025

Just One More Step: Australia’s New Weapon Laws

Australia implemented a firearm ban and mandatory confiscation in 1996 pursuant to the National Firearms Agreement, in which nearly 700,000 privately-owned firearms were turned in to the government and destroyed. In 2017, NRA-ILA described how the country’s anti-gun officials and activists were nonetheless continuing to demand even stricter gun controls: “For those interested in restricting freedom, there’s always one more step that must be taken.”

True to predictions, the State of Western Australia (WA) has since adopted what the state government calls “Australia’s toughest firearms laws,” the Firearms Act Reforms 2024 and regulations, which take effect at the end of March. In the meantime, the government has been running a gun “buyback” scheme since February 2024 for gun owners who will have to give up their guns under the new law, with a budget of A$64.3million. As of January 2025, the government reported that approximately 52,000 firearms had been surrendered to police and removed, the “biggest reduction of firearms anywhere in the nation since 1997 when then Prime Minister John Howard introduced the National Firearms Agreement and buyback scheme.”

At the time the laws were proposed, WA’s government called the changes historic firearm reforms that would enhance community safety but, more to the point, laws that would “reduce unnecessary firearm ownership.” “Unnecessary,” obviously, is a subjective concept. 

The latest laws include new license categories, prohibitions and disqualifications, restrictions on the number of guns an individual may own, mandatory health evaluations, mandatory training, and strict new storage requirements.

For individuals, licenses will be required for competitive shooters (“participating in shooting competitions held by a licensed firearm club at a licensed firearm range”); these licensees are limited to a maximum of ten firearms. A hunting license is required for anyone engaging in the lawful hunting of animals on land which the license holder has authority to hunt on, and the land must be registered with the government by the landowner. The maximum number of firearms that can be licensed under a hunting license is five, and is restricted to firearms listed as a “category A or B” firearm. The introduction of these firearm ownership limits was expected “to remove up to 13,000 guns from the WA community.”

A paintball license “authorizes the licensee to use a prescribed paintball gun for the purposes of participating in games of paintball conducted under the authority of a Paintball Business License,” with very specific requirements for the location of use and the paintball gun itself (e.g., the paintball gun must have “a calibre of at least 0.4 inches and not more than 0.68 inches”).  Collectors of firearms, to qualify for a license, “must prove they are a student of arms and are a member of an approved society of collectors,” and “each firearm, major firearm part or ammunition already held or applied for must fall within the scope of the applicant’s applied interest.” In addition, the collection must meet defined “collectable firearm requirements.”

Persons with specified criminal convictions or subject to various restraining or protective orders stand to lose their licenses and have their guns seized. A license holder served with an interim restraining order or charged with a disqualifying offence becomes “an interim disqualified person during the court process” until the matter is resolved, and, during this period, their firearm license is suspended and firearms seized. Disqualification periods for such court orders are the length of the order plus five years: if an order lasted two years, “on the day it expires the 5-year period commences which then totals a disqualification period of 7 years” – a cumulative period more than three times the duration of the prohibiting order. For individuals with a disqualifying conviction, they remain disqualified for the period that represents the maximum imprisonment time possible for their offence plus any actual term of imprisonment, or, if the person was not imprisoned, the maximum imprisonment penalty. “Disqualifying offences and orders will be considered retrospectively,” meaning individuals with convictions and orders that predate the effective date of the laws may still be prohibited.

WA becomes the first Australian jurisdiction to require specific, recurring mental health checks as part of the licensing of gun owners. These include a self-assessment form that the applicant or licensee completes and takes to their medical provider. The doctor is to review the self-assessment form and conduct a medical assessment of the applicant/licensee, with the results reported to police (meets or does not meet the firearm authority health standards, or meets with conditions). New license applicants must undergo the examination as part of the application process; existing licensees will be subject to health examinations incrementally over a five-year transitional period. Licensees aged 80 or over will be required to undergo annual exams.

The new security and storage requirements depend on the type of firearm involved (including paintball guns, air rifles, muzzle-loading long guns, cannons, “kiln guns,” tranquilizer guns, and handguns). To make it easier for gun owners to understand this part of the law, the WA Police have published a color-coded matrix chart that breaks down the mandatory storage requirements based on the number and type of guns, and whether the storage location is occupied or unoccupied. This contains additional instructions for shared compliant storage (“a family could store all their firearms in one large cabinet so long as they are made temporarily inoperable so other family members with access to the firearms cabinet cannot use the firearm”) and on the necessary surveillance and alarm system standards. Separate security requirements apply to firearms when being transported.

Elsewhere in Australia, the State of Victoria is ramping up their machete law from a restriction to the country’s first-ever machete ban. Last year, the government proposed the Firearms and Control of Weapons (Machetes) Amendment Bill 2024 to restrict the use of machetes as weapons by specifically listing “machetes” as a type of “controlled weapon” that could not be possessed, carried, or used without a “lawful excuse,” or sold to anyone under the age of 18. The penalty for carrying a controlled weapon without a lawful excuse is a fine of more than A$23,000 or a jail term of one year. (According to the state police, “[s]elf-defence is not a lawful excuse for carrying [a] controlled weapon or dangerous articles.”)

Earlier this month, Victoria Premier Jacinta Allan announced harsher measures to reclassify machetes as “prohibited weapons,” making their sale, possession, and use illegal except for persons with government exemptions. The measure would take effect on September 1, although an amnesty between September 1 and November 30 would allow people to dispose of such weapons “using secure bins in safe locations.” Otherwise, those caught possessing a machete will face penalties that include up to two years in jail or a fine exceeding A$47,000. 

Machetes would join the already lengthy list of “prohibited weapons” in the state that includes flick knives, non-metal/ceramic knives (“excluding plastic cutlery”), swords, laser pointers, slingshots and catapults, tasers/stun guns, crossbows, laser-tag imitation firearms, gel blaster guns, extendable batons, “acoustic anti-personnel devices,” and mace sprays and similar “noxious discharge articles” (club-type maces are also prohibited, “other than a ceremonial mace made for and used solely as a symbol of authority on ceremonial occasions”).   

The state government has not yet finalized the key definition of “machete” or the exemptions framework, although it has indicated that machetes “can be broadly described as a cutting edge knife with a blade of more than 20 centimetres [about 8 inches]. Government will consult with industry on this definition before the ban starts, with kitchen knives not intended to be included.”

“That’s not a knife,” Crocodile Dundee famously taunted a mugger in the hit 1986 film. “That’s a knife!” he continued, flashing his own hunting blade. Only now, Dundee’s iconic knife is apparently a banned machete, and his (non-injurious) use of it for defensive purposes would be banned as well.

Apart from these major issues, there are other obvious problems. Turning in machetes under the amnesty would be entirely voluntary, with no compensation offered, and the government “has not outlined any proactive enforcement strategy to track remaining weapons after the amnesty period ends.” Machetes may still be legally imported into Australia because the federal government has not implemented a nationwide ban or other restrictions. And although Premier Allan has called on retailers to stop placing stock orders for machetes, residents will be able to circumvent the ban by buying machetes in other states. Criminals, true to form, will continue to ignore the law, as they have always done, and acquire (and use) machetes and other “prohibited weapons” and guns illegally.

That, of course, is the heart of the matter. Human nature being what it is, the evil-minded and the mindlessly violent will always be with us. A former WA police commissioner observes that going after law-abiding sports shooters, and farmers and others who require access to legitimate firearms “is nonsensical because it’s not going to make a difference to the problem” of illegal guns and violent crime. Premier Allen, speaking of the Victoria’s new ban, seemingly ignored the role that the criminal element plays in wreaking havoc on her state’s residents and focused on scapegoating the tool: “Machetes are destroying lives so we will destroy machetes.”

As American Founding Father Thomas Jefferson recognized long ago, laws forbidding the carrying of arms “disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes” while making “things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants.” As honest Australians fret over whether possessing a kitchen knife is liable to turn them into felons, criminals are apt to rejoice that curtailing “unnecessary firearm ownership” and other weapon clampdowns simply disarm their would-be victims. Making citizens more vulnerable increases crime which, in turn, justifies the “one more step” required to enhance public safety. Rinse and repeat.

TRENDING NOW
Anti-gun Lawmakers Attempt to Ban Essential Second Amendment Arms

News  

Monday, May 5, 2025

Anti-gun Lawmakers Attempt to Ban Essential Second Amendment Arms

On April 30, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) introduced the so-called “Assault Weapons Ban of 2025.” Picking up where his predecessor Dianne Feinstein left off, Schiff’s legislation would ban commonly-owned semi-automatic firearms, such as the AR-15.

Partisan Due Process Renaissance Excludes American Gun Owners

News  

Monday, May 5, 2025

Partisan Due Process Renaissance Excludes American Gun Owners

An observer of American political discourse can’t go anywhere these days without being bombarded by reproachful references to the importance of “due process.”

Kansas Supreme Court Enforces PLCAA in High Profile Case

News  

Monday, May 5, 2025

Kansas Supreme Court Enforces PLCAA in High Profile Case

Last week, the Kansas Supreme Court upheld a significant district court dismissal in Johnson v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC, deciding that Bass Pro Outdoor World and Beretta USA/Beretta Italy cannot be sued by a man who ...

Not Your Father’s DOJ: Government Actively Backs Second Amendment in Litigation

News  

Monday, May 5, 2025

Not Your Father’s DOJ: Government Actively Backs Second Amendment in Litigation

It has, in theory, always been the sworn duty of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to uphold the constitutional rights of American citizens and to affirmatively protect fundamental liberties. 

UPDATE: Legislation Introduced to Protect Veterans’ Second Amendment Rights

News  

Monday, May 5, 2025

UPDATE: Legislation Introduced to Protect Veterans’ Second Amendment Rights

The Chairmen of the House and Senate Committees on Veterans’ Affairs, U.S. Representative Mike Bost (R-IL-12) and Senator Jerry Moran (R-KS), as well as Senator John Kennedy (R-LA), have reintroduced the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act ...

Trump Administration Revives Federal Firearm Rights Restoration Provision

News  

Friday, March 21, 2025

Trump Administration Revives Federal Firearm Rights Restoration Provision

On March 20, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) published an interim final rule entitled, Withdrawing the Attorney General’s Delegation of Authority. That bland title belies the historic nature of the measure, which is aimed at reviving ...

I’d Like a McHurry, Please, with a Side of No Time to Spare

News  

Monday, May 5, 2025

I’d Like a McHurry, Please, with a Side of No Time to Spare

Market research indicates that most adults (42%) who eat at McDonald’s and similar fast-food restaurants expect to receive their food within a maximum of five minutes after ordering, while for seven percent of respondents, the “fast” in ...

Rep. Sheri Biggs Introduces Bill to Ease Shotgun Purchases

News  

Thursday, May 1, 2025

Rep. Sheri Biggs Introduces Bill to Ease Shotgun Purchases

On April 28, 2025, Representative Sheri Biggs (R-SC-03) reintroduced the No Frivolous Applications for Short-Barreled Shotguns (NFA SBS) Act (H.R. 3034). This legislation removes short-barreled shotguns from the National Firearms Act so that they will be treated ...

Illinois Appellate Court Upholds FOID Act in NRA-Backed Challenge

Thursday, May 1, 2025

Illinois Appellate Court Upholds FOID Act in NRA-Backed Challenge

Under the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act (FOID Act), Illinois requires a license and imposes fees to acquire and possess firearms.

House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs Votes to Advance Legislation to Protect Veterans Second Amendment Rights

News  

Tuesday, May 6, 2025

House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs Votes to Advance Legislation to Protect Veterans Second Amendment Rights

On Tuesday, May 6, 2025, the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, led by Chairman Mike Bost (R-IL-12), held a markup for several bills. Among these bills being considered was H.R. 1041, the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act, ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.