Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Just One More Step: Australia’s New Weapon Laws

Monday, March 24, 2025

Just One More Step: Australia’s New Weapon Laws

Australia implemented a firearm ban and mandatory confiscation in 1996 pursuant to the National Firearms Agreement, in which nearly 700,000 privately-owned firearms were turned in to the government and destroyed. In 2017, NRA-ILA described how the country’s anti-gun officials and activists were nonetheless continuing to demand even stricter gun controls: “For those interested in restricting freedom, there’s always one more step that must be taken.”

True to predictions, the State of Western Australia (WA) has since adopted what the state government calls “Australia’s toughest firearms laws,” the Firearms Act Reforms 2024 and regulations, which take effect at the end of March. In the meantime, the government has been running a gun “buyback” scheme since February 2024 for gun owners who will have to give up their guns under the new law, with a budget of A$64.3million. As of January 2025, the government reported that approximately 52,000 firearms had been surrendered to police and removed, the “biggest reduction of firearms anywhere in the nation since 1997 when then Prime Minister John Howard introduced the National Firearms Agreement and buyback scheme.”

At the time the laws were proposed, WA’s government called the changes historic firearm reforms that would enhance community safety but, more to the point, laws that would “reduce unnecessary firearm ownership.” “Unnecessary,” obviously, is a subjective concept. 

The latest laws include new license categories, prohibitions and disqualifications, restrictions on the number of guns an individual may own, mandatory health evaluations, mandatory training, and strict new storage requirements.

For individuals, licenses will be required for competitive shooters (“participating in shooting competitions held by a licensed firearm club at a licensed firearm range”); these licensees are limited to a maximum of ten firearms. A hunting license is required for anyone engaging in the lawful hunting of animals on land which the license holder has authority to hunt on, and the land must be registered with the government by the landowner. The maximum number of firearms that can be licensed under a hunting license is five, and is restricted to firearms listed as a “category A or B” firearm. The introduction of these firearm ownership limits was expected “to remove up to 13,000 guns from the WA community.”

A paintball license “authorizes the licensee to use a prescribed paintball gun for the purposes of participating in games of paintball conducted under the authority of a Paintball Business License,” with very specific requirements for the location of use and the paintball gun itself (e.g., the paintball gun must have “a calibre of at least 0.4 inches and not more than 0.68 inches”).  Collectors of firearms, to qualify for a license, “must prove they are a student of arms and are a member of an approved society of collectors,” and “each firearm, major firearm part or ammunition already held or applied for must fall within the scope of the applicant’s applied interest.” In addition, the collection must meet defined “collectable firearm requirements.”

Persons with specified criminal convictions or subject to various restraining or protective orders stand to lose their licenses and have their guns seized. A license holder served with an interim restraining order or charged with a disqualifying offence becomes “an interim disqualified person during the court process” until the matter is resolved, and, during this period, their firearm license is suspended and firearms seized. Disqualification periods for such court orders are the length of the order plus five years: if an order lasted two years, “on the day it expires the 5-year period commences which then totals a disqualification period of 7 years” – a cumulative period more than three times the duration of the prohibiting order. For individuals with a disqualifying conviction, they remain disqualified for the period that represents the maximum imprisonment time possible for their offence plus any actual term of imprisonment, or, if the person was not imprisoned, the maximum imprisonment penalty. “Disqualifying offences and orders will be considered retrospectively,” meaning individuals with convictions and orders that predate the effective date of the laws may still be prohibited.

WA becomes the first Australian jurisdiction to require specific, recurring mental health checks as part of the licensing of gun owners. These include a self-assessment form that the applicant or licensee completes and takes to their medical provider. The doctor is to review the self-assessment form and conduct a medical assessment of the applicant/licensee, with the results reported to police (meets or does not meet the firearm authority health standards, or meets with conditions). New license applicants must undergo the examination as part of the application process; existing licensees will be subject to health examinations incrementally over a five-year transitional period. Licensees aged 80 or over will be required to undergo annual exams.

The new security and storage requirements depend on the type of firearm involved (including paintball guns, air rifles, muzzle-loading long guns, cannons, “kiln guns,” tranquilizer guns, and handguns). To make it easier for gun owners to understand this part of the law, the WA Police have published a color-coded matrix chart that breaks down the mandatory storage requirements based on the number and type of guns, and whether the storage location is occupied or unoccupied. This contains additional instructions for shared compliant storage (“a family could store all their firearms in one large cabinet so long as they are made temporarily inoperable so other family members with access to the firearms cabinet cannot use the firearm”) and on the necessary surveillance and alarm system standards. Separate security requirements apply to firearms when being transported.

Elsewhere in Australia, the State of Victoria is ramping up their machete law from a restriction to the country’s first-ever machete ban. Last year, the government proposed the Firearms and Control of Weapons (Machetes) Amendment Bill 2024 to restrict the use of machetes as weapons by specifically listing “machetes” as a type of “controlled weapon” that could not be possessed, carried, or used without a “lawful excuse,” or sold to anyone under the age of 18. The penalty for carrying a controlled weapon without a lawful excuse is a fine of more than A$23,000 or a jail term of one year. (According to the state police, “[s]elf-defence is not a lawful excuse for carrying [a] controlled weapon or dangerous articles.”)

Earlier this month, Victoria Premier Jacinta Allan announced harsher measures to reclassify machetes as “prohibited weapons,” making their sale, possession, and use illegal except for persons with government exemptions. The measure would take effect on September 1, although an amnesty between September 1 and November 30 would allow people to dispose of such weapons “using secure bins in safe locations.” Otherwise, those caught possessing a machete will face penalties that include up to two years in jail or a fine exceeding A$47,000. 

Machetes would join the already lengthy list of “prohibited weapons” in the state that includes flick knives, non-metal/ceramic knives (“excluding plastic cutlery”), swords, laser pointers, slingshots and catapults, tasers/stun guns, crossbows, laser-tag imitation firearms, gel blaster guns, extendable batons, “acoustic anti-personnel devices,” and mace sprays and similar “noxious discharge articles” (club-type maces are also prohibited, “other than a ceremonial mace made for and used solely as a symbol of authority on ceremonial occasions”).   

The state government has not yet finalized the key definition of “machete” or the exemptions framework, although it has indicated that machetes “can be broadly described as a cutting edge knife with a blade of more than 20 centimetres [about 8 inches]. Government will consult with industry on this definition before the ban starts, with kitchen knives not intended to be included.”

“That’s not a knife,” Crocodile Dundee famously taunted a mugger in the hit 1986 film. “That’s a knife!” he continued, flashing his own hunting blade. Only now, Dundee’s iconic knife is apparently a banned machete, and his (non-injurious) use of it for defensive purposes would be banned as well.

Apart from these major issues, there are other obvious problems. Turning in machetes under the amnesty would be entirely voluntary, with no compensation offered, and the government “has not outlined any proactive enforcement strategy to track remaining weapons after the amnesty period ends.” Machetes may still be legally imported into Australia because the federal government has not implemented a nationwide ban or other restrictions. And although Premier Allan has called on retailers to stop placing stock orders for machetes, residents will be able to circumvent the ban by buying machetes in other states. Criminals, true to form, will continue to ignore the law, as they have always done, and acquire (and use) machetes and other “prohibited weapons” and guns illegally.

That, of course, is the heart of the matter. Human nature being what it is, the evil-minded and the mindlessly violent will always be with us. A former WA police commissioner observes that going after law-abiding sports shooters, and farmers and others who require access to legitimate firearms “is nonsensical because it’s not going to make a difference to the problem” of illegal guns and violent crime. Premier Allen, speaking of the Victoria’s new ban, seemingly ignored the role that the criminal element plays in wreaking havoc on her state’s residents and focused on scapegoating the tool: “Machetes are destroying lives so we will destroy machetes.”

As American Founding Father Thomas Jefferson recognized long ago, laws forbidding the carrying of arms “disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes” while making “things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants.” As honest Australians fret over whether possessing a kitchen knife is liable to turn them into felons, criminals are apt to rejoice that curtailing “unnecessary firearm ownership” and other weapon clampdowns simply disarm their would-be victims. Making citizens more vulnerable increases crime which, in turn, justifies the “one more step” required to enhance public safety. Rinse and repeat.

TRENDING NOW
North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Last week the North Carolina General Assembly briefly returned from recess and re-referred Senate Bill 50, Freedom to Carry NC, to the House Rules Committee.

Federal Court Strikes Down Biden Administration’s “Engaged in the Business” Rule in NRA Case

Thursday, October 2, 2025

Federal Court Strikes Down Biden Administration’s “Engaged in the Business” Rule in NRA Case

Yesterday, in Butler v. Bondi, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama held that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives exceeded its statutory authority by issuing its 2024 Final Rule expanding ...

First Affirmative Lawsuit in Support of Gun Owners Filed by Trump’s DOJ

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

First Affirmative Lawsuit in Support of Gun Owners Filed by Trump’s DOJ

California officials’ egregious foot-dragging over the issuance of carry permits has finally attracted the ire of the federal Department of Justice (DOJ). 

President Trump’s GOP Leads Polling on Crime and Guns, To No Surprise

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

President Trump’s GOP Leads Polling on Crime and Guns, To No Surprise

A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll revealed that Americans know the President Donald Trump-led Republican Party has a better plan than their Democratic Party opponents on crime and gun control.

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Fifth Circuit Case Challenging the Federal Switchblade Act

Friday, October 3, 2025

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Fifth Circuit Case Challenging the Federal Switchblade Act

Yesterday, the National Rifle Association filed an amicus brief in Knife Rights, Inc. v. Bondi, urging the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas’s decision upholding the Federal ...

Trump Administration Repeals Biden Era Firearms Export Crackdown

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

Trump Administration Repeals Biden Era Firearms Export Crackdown

Last Monday, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) at the U.S. Department of Commerce published a final rule that reversed a crackdown on the commercial export of firearms from the U.S. to other countries.

Trust in Mass Media Craters to New Lows, in Single Digits With Republicans

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

Trust in Mass Media Craters to New Lows, in Single Digits With Republicans

There’s an old saying that rings especially true to Second Amendment supporters: If you don’t read the news, you’re uninformed.

Alphabet Eases the Reins on Censorship; Will Gun Content Eventually Benefit?

News  

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

Alphabet Eases the Reins on Censorship; Will Gun Content Eventually Benefit?

With the free speech debate recently co-opted by one TV host’s use of false and incendiary remarks about his political opponents, it might have been easy to miss another important First Amendment story last week. 

Canada’s Public Safety Minister on Gun Ban & Confiscation: “Don’t Ask Me to Explain the Logic”

News  

Monday, September 29, 2025

Canada’s Public Safety Minister on Gun Ban & Confiscation: “Don’t Ask Me to Explain the Logic”

There have been multiple developments on the Canadian gun grab and ban in the last few days, but the most astounding has got to be a leaked bombshell recording of the Liberal Public Safety Minister, ...

U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Challenge to Hawaii’s Private Property Default Carry Ban

Friday, October 3, 2025

U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Challenge to Hawaii’s Private Property Default Carry Ban

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the petition for certiorari in Wolford v. Lopez, a challenge to Hawaii’s law forbidding carry on private property open to the public (such as restaurants, gas stations, and grocery stores) ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.