Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

The Unkindest Cut: British Crackdown on “Ninja Swords” Suggests Bias, Futility

Monday, April 14, 2025

The Unkindest Cut: British Crackdown on “Ninja Swords” Suggests Bias, Futility

The United Kingdom (UK) has a long history of exerting control over its subjects, especially when it comes to depriving them of arms.  It also has a weird history, albeit a shorter one, of an apparent dislike of Japanese culture when it comes to arms. The latest example of the UK exerting its control over its subjects and seeming dislike of Japanese culture comes in the form of a recently passed ban on what the Brits refer to as “ninja swords.”

As is often the case in weapons crackdowns, this ban arose from a single, atypical crime. A teenage boy, Ronan Kanda, was killed by another teenage boy who used a “ninja sword” to commit the murder.  The killer and an accomplice were both convicted sentenced to life in prison. Neither perpetrator, it should be said, was Japanese, nor apparently a ninja.

But, as is often the case in England, the tool used to commit the crime—along with anyone who legally possessed one—also faced consequences.

There is no real history of “ninja swords;” not, at least, in the context of Japanese or British culture or arms. There is a long, storied history of many other weapons that are immediately identified as being of Japanese origin, including widely recognized swords like the katana or other martial arts implements like the shuriken.

The katana is the sword most people visualize when thinking about what a samurai carries.  Shuriken, or throwing stars, are probably the weapon most people associate with the cinematic depiction of ninjas; small, flat metal plates with sharp edges or points that can be thrown—often with great accuracy in the hands of someone with years of training and practice.

These items, along with numerous other martial arts tools, have long, documented histories in Japan and Japanese culture.  The “ninja sword,” on the other hand, appears to be an invention of the 20th Century.

So, why ban “ninja swords?”  Vivid descriptors, even if inaccurate, can help sensationalize and marginalize inanimate objects.  Much like anti-gun extremists in the U.S. invent terms to mischaracterize firearms they wish to ban—like “assault weapon,” “Saturday night special,” and “ghost gun”—in the UK, a similar strategy is often incorporated when trying to ban edged weapons (firearms have been increasingly out of reach to the average Briton for decades).

If you peruse the list of prohibited knives and weapons in the UK, you will find that the Brits have interestingly-named categories of banned items, such as “disguised knife,” “stealth knife,” and “zombie knife.”  Also of note, however, are the numerous prohibited items that originated in Japan.

Most of these items were developed hundreds of years ago; some, perhaps, more than a thousand.  Many, if not most, also require a great deal of skill in order to be used effectively.  Some are even so obscure that one wonders how or why they were banned.

For example, there is the prohibited “kyoketsu soge,” described in the UK as “a hook-knife fastened to one end of a piece of rope, cord, chain or wire.”  It is unlikely most have ever seen such an item used anywhere except in the movies, or maybe at a Japanese martial arts exhibition.  Even those who watch a lot of movies that include a great deal of martial arts, even those set in feudal Japan, probably don’t see these things very often.  And the skill and training required to become even slightly proficient with it is likely daunting to most.

But the Brits banned it.  Was there a time in England when these were widely used to commit crimes?

Another prohibited item is the “kusari gama,” described in the UK as “a sickle fastened to one end of a piece of rope, cord, chain or wire.”  Everything said about the “kyoketsu soge” can be said about the “kusari gama.”

Then there is what the British call the “kusari or ‘manrikigusari,’” which is more commonly known as the kusari-fundo.  Described under British prohibition as “a hard weight or hand grip fastened to each end of a piece of rope, cord, chain or wire,” everything said about the “kyoketsu soge” and the “kusari gama” also applies with this item.

The aforementioned shuriken is also on the banned list.  Katanas are not specifically named as being banned but would generally fall under the ban on “swords,” provided the katana is more than 50 cm (just under 20 inches) in length.

So, do the British have a problem with the Japanese?  That’s hard to say, but they do seem to have a problem with Japanese martial arts implements.  That is likely traced back to at least the 1980s.  That’s when the American children’s cartoon, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, was gaining worldwide popularity.  In England, though, they changed the name to Teenage Mutant Hero Turtles, and edited the use of nunchaku, commonly identified with Okinawa and Japan.  Use of nunchaku was also edited in another kids’ cartoon of the ‘80s, ThunderCats. And while the incomparable Bruce Lee was American by birth and Chinese by descent, his iconic nunchaku scenes were apparently edited out of UK versions of what was arguably his most famous and influential movie, .

So, while nunchaku were growing in visibility through some media in the ‘80s, the British apparently thought they posed a threat. Curiously, though, they did not ban nunchaku but decided to ban all the obscure items of Japanese origin previously mentioned.

It was 1988 when the UK cracked down on what they deemed “offensive weapons.” Yet the very idea of an “offensive” weapon is absurd. If a ninja sword is used on the attack, it is offensive. If it’s used to thwart an attack, it is defensive. This could be said of anything, from a rock to a club to a semi-automatic rifle. Whether a weapon is offensive or defensive is more likely to be situational than determined by some inherent design characteristic.

Ultimately, it is difficult to determine what drives UK policy when it comes to regulating what are little more than tools or cultural artifacts. But since murder and assault have been banned in England since time immemorial, the piecemeal approach of “blame it on the weapon” may simply be a symbolic gesture of “doing something” by an inept government that is presiding over the wholesale deterioration of its nation’s culture. They might as well outlaw bleeding and dying by the victims.

The young thug who committed the murder that inspired this “ninja sword” ban had no problem breaking the weapons carrying law—not to mention the law prohibiting murder—so it is unlikely future violent criminals (or even ninja assassins) will care about the extra prohibition.  Criminals, by their very nature, break the law, so adding yet another prohibition to the books is unlikely to change their behavior.

As a final point to ponder is that Japan, one of the most restrictive countries when it comes to the possession of weapons of any type, does not ban swords, whether named “ninja” or otherwise.  They do require them to be registered, but there are over 2 million of them in legal possession, and they do not seem to be experiencing the problems that England is having.

Could it be something other than the swords (and the shuriken and the kusari gama and the manrikigusari and so on and so forth) that would contribute to the tendency of one teenager in Britain to murder another?

We suspect so.

TRENDING NOW
North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Last week the North Carolina General Assembly briefly returned from recess and re-referred Senate Bill 50, Freedom to Carry NC, to the House Rules Committee.

Federal Court Strikes Down Biden Administration’s “Engaged in the Business” Rule in NRA Case

Thursday, October 2, 2025

Federal Court Strikes Down Biden Administration’s “Engaged in the Business” Rule in NRA Case

Yesterday, in Butler v. Bondi, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama held that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives exceeded its statutory authority by issuing its 2024 Final Rule expanding ...

First Affirmative Lawsuit in Support of Gun Owners Filed by Trump’s DOJ

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

First Affirmative Lawsuit in Support of Gun Owners Filed by Trump’s DOJ

California officials’ egregious foot-dragging over the issuance of carry permits has finally attracted the ire of the federal Department of Justice (DOJ). 

President Trump’s GOP Leads Polling on Crime and Guns, To No Surprise

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

President Trump’s GOP Leads Polling on Crime and Guns, To No Surprise

A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll revealed that Americans know the President Donald Trump-led Republican Party has a better plan than their Democratic Party opponents on crime and gun control.

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Fifth Circuit Case Challenging the Federal Switchblade Act

Friday, October 3, 2025

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Fifth Circuit Case Challenging the Federal Switchblade Act

Yesterday, the National Rifle Association filed an amicus brief in Knife Rights, Inc. v. Bondi, urging the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas’s decision upholding the Federal ...

Trump Administration Repeals Biden Era Firearms Export Crackdown

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

Trump Administration Repeals Biden Era Firearms Export Crackdown

Last Monday, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) at the U.S. Department of Commerce published a final rule that reversed a crackdown on the commercial export of firearms from the U.S. to other countries.

Trust in Mass Media Craters to New Lows, in Single Digits With Republicans

News  

Monday, October 6, 2025

Trust in Mass Media Craters to New Lows, in Single Digits With Republicans

There’s an old saying that rings especially true to Second Amendment supporters: If you don’t read the news, you’re uninformed.

Alphabet Eases the Reins on Censorship; Will Gun Content Eventually Benefit?

News  

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

Alphabet Eases the Reins on Censorship; Will Gun Content Eventually Benefit?

With the free speech debate recently co-opted by one TV host’s use of false and incendiary remarks about his political opponents, it might have been easy to miss another important First Amendment story last week. 

Canada’s Public Safety Minister on Gun Ban & Confiscation: “Don’t Ask Me to Explain the Logic”

News  

Monday, September 29, 2025

Canada’s Public Safety Minister on Gun Ban & Confiscation: “Don’t Ask Me to Explain the Logic”

There have been multiple developments on the Canadian gun grab and ban in the last few days, but the most astounding has got to be a leaked bombshell recording of the Liberal Public Safety Minister, ...

U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Challenge to Hawaii’s Private Property Default Carry Ban

Friday, October 3, 2025

U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Challenge to Hawaii’s Private Property Default Carry Ban

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the petition for certiorari in Wolford v. Lopez, a challenge to Hawaii’s law forbidding carry on private property open to the public (such as restaurants, gas stations, and grocery stores) ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.