Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

What Will Gavin Newsom and Kamala Harris Do Regarding Glocks?

Monday, September 22, 2025

What Will Gavin Newsom and Kamala Harris Do Regarding Glocks?

The California State Legislature has adjourned for the year and, unsurprisingly, sent a number of anti-gun bills to Governor Gavin Newsom (D) to consider.  While it would be completely within his nature to simply sign them into law, perhaps his desire to become president will cause him to at least think about what is in the best interest of his political future regarding one of the bills.

Sadly, we’ve learned to not expect his decisions to be guided by what’s in the best interest of Californians, and certainly not the law-abiding ones who own firearms.

That said, of particular interest to any discussion about the governor’s political future regarding this slate of anti-gun bills is Assembly Bill 1127, which would prohibit California firearms dealers from selling certain semi-automatic pistols. While the claimed intent is to better restrict individuals from converting certain pistols into automatic “machine guns,” federal law already prohibits such conversion.

This effort is little more than an attempt to ban Glock pistols in California, even if they are not specifically named in the bill.

As a bit of back story (one most readers know), anti-gun extremists have long blamed gun manufacturers when criminals use their lawfully made products to commit violent crimes; even though the criminals generally obtain them through illegal means and use them in ways never intended.  Glock pistols have been specifically vilified by these same groups in recent years because criminals have sometimes gone even further than “just” using them to commit crimes; they illegally modify them.

While some have suggested taking a somewhat unnecessary, duplicative approach of enacting new prohibitions on the already federally-prohibited act of converting semi-automatic firearms into fully-automatic firearms, others have decided that they must punish gun makers—specifically Glock—when criminals decide to violate federal laws to make these conversions.

Readers are painfully aware of anti-gun extremists trying to sue gun manufacturers for the criminal acts of third parties.  It was this campaign of meritless lawsuits, designed to bankrupt gun makers and distributors, that led to the passage of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) in 2005. The PLCAA received broad bipartisan support.

The PLCAA simply makes it clear that the firearms industry, in lawfully marketing its products, is not responsible for the acts of criminals who misuse them.

Realizing how hard it might be to try to circumvent the PLCAA in the U.S., anti-gun extremists then began to collaborate with foreign governments to restart their destructive, unwarranted litigation campaign.  The Supreme Court of the United States, thankfully, recently held that the PLCAA’s protections don’t really care if the third party crimes supposedly giving rise to a meritless suit are homegrown or from another country.  The protections still apply.

These kinds of legal defeats led to an offshoot of the rejected litigation smear campaign, as cities like Chicago, unable or unwilling to address their violent crime problem, took to suing Glock because the city’s criminals were not just terrorizing honest, law-abiding residents and visitors by illegally acquiring firearms, but were also illegally modifying pistols made specifically by Glock.

This kind of thinking is what led to AB 1127 in California.

But what Newsom does with this bill—sign or veto—is still something to consider, even if his instinct may be to just reflexively sign an anti-gun bill.  You see, it has become obvious to anyone who follows national politics even a little that Gavin Newsom wants to be president.  In order to achieve that goal, however, he may have to try to convince law-abiding gun owners he is not going to do everything in his power to eviscerate their rights protected under the Second Amendment if he should actually become president.

To that end, Newsom recently took part in a podcast where he claimed, “I’m not anti-gun at all.”  This came after the host, Shawn Ryan, “gifted” the governor a California-compliant pistol; a Sig P365 XMACRO semi-automatic handgun with a 10-round magazine (rather than the standard 17-round) required under California law.

Newsome went on to proclaim, I’m also deeply mindful and respectful of the Second Amendment and people’s Constitutional rights.”

It was later reported that Newsom never actually accepted the gift.  Whether he didn’t accept because he actually hates all guns or because he could not figure out how to navigate California’s Byzantine gun laws is unclear.

So, if he actually is not anti-gun and respects the Second Amendment (against all available evidence), maybe he will consider vetoing the bill.  We don’t anticipate that, but considering Glock pistols are arguably the most popular self-defense handguns in America, if not the world, you would think the positions Newsom claimed in the Ryan interview would guide him towards a veto.

Glocks are also extremely popular with law enforcement, as many departments make them standard-issue sidearms for their officers, including some in California.  That, of course, is why AB 1127 contains the standard exemptions that allow acquisition and use by law enforcement found in virtually every other anti-gun law.

Then there’s former vice president Kamala Harris (D) to consider.  She, like Newsom, has tried to claim she is not rabidly anti-gun.  She went so far as to try to convince gun owners she was just like them by claiming to own a handgun; specifically, a Glock.  While she never specified what model, there’s a reasonably good chance that, if she does own a Glock, it would be affected by AB 1127.

So, what are the political optics of a California governor signing into law a ban on the manufacture and sale of a handgun that a former California Attorney General (Harris) claims to own?  And what would Harris then do?

Does she hope nobody connects the dots? Does she orchestrate a public anti-gun display of ceremoniously turning the gun over to be destroyed, even though AB 1127 does not appear to have any impact on guns currently owned that might fall under its proscription? Does she keep a gun that could no longer lawfully be sold or purchased by “ordinary” Californians?

Harris, potentially, could be running against Newsom to be the next Democrat nominee for president. Does that factor into Newsom’s calculus on AB 1127? Could he sign it, even though it goes against his claim of not being anti-gun, just to paint Harris into a corner regarding her claim of owning a Glock?

There may be a surprising amount of consideration that goes into what Newsom does with AB 1127. California anti-gun politics, however, do not translate well to the country at large. We shall soon see where Newsom’s true priorities lie: at home or in an address across the country on Pennsylvania Avenue in D.C.

Stay tuned.

TRENDING NOW
What Will Gavin Newsom and Kamala Harris Do Regarding Glocks?

News  

Monday, September 22, 2025

What Will Gavin Newsom and Kamala Harris Do Regarding Glocks?

The California State Legislature has adjourned for the year and, unsurprisingly, sent a number of anti-gun bills to Governor Gavin Newsom (D) to consider. 

Trump’s DOJ Will Participate in Oral Arguments in Illinois Semi-Auto Ban Case

News  

Monday, September 15, 2025

Trump’s DOJ Will Participate in Oral Arguments in Illinois Semi-Auto Ban Case

Within six months of the landmark United States Supreme Court decision of NYSRPA v. Bruen (2022), Illinois disregarded the Court’s clear directives and enacted into law H.B. 5741, the Protect Illinois Communities Act (PICA). 

Another “Violence Interrupter” Sentenced for Disrupting Violently

News  

Monday, September 22, 2025

Another “Violence Interrupter” Sentenced for Disrupting Violently

NRA has been consistent in its suggestions for tackling firearm-related crime: Enforce the existing laws against criminals. 

Pennsylvania: House Democrat Majority Schedules Major Gun Control Vote for Monday

Thursday, September 18, 2025

Pennsylvania: House Democrat Majority Schedules Major Gun Control Vote for Monday

On Monday, September 22, at 11:00 a.m., the House Judiciary Committee is scheduled to take up a full slate of gun control bills. The timing of this package is yet more proof that their legislative ...

Open Carry Comes to Florida

News  

Monday, September 22, 2025

Open Carry Comes to Florida

On September 10, the First District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida struck down the Sunshine State’s prohibition on open carry as a violation of the Second Amendment in the case McDaniel v. Florida. ...

Canada’s Gun Grab: Amnesty Expiration Approaches as Top Officials Sow Confusion

News  

Monday, September 22, 2025

Canada’s Gun Grab: Amnesty Expiration Approaches as Top Officials Sow Confusion

Canada’s Liberal government has consistently and misleadingly used “buyback” to describe the 2020 mandatory “assault weapon” confiscation law, in an attempt to make the scheme appear less hostile to property rights and Canada’s responsible gun ...

Armed Citizens: Not Just an American Concept

News  

Monday, September 15, 2025

Armed Citizens: Not Just an American Concept

We frequently post stories about law-abiding citizens who, by exercising their rights protected under the Second Amendment, bring an end to violent criminal assaults.  

DOJ Files Amicus Brief Supporting NRA-Backed Challenge to New Jersey’s Ban on “Assault Firearms” and “Large-Capacity Magazines”

Friday, September 19, 2025

DOJ Files Amicus Brief Supporting NRA-Backed Challenge to New Jersey’s Ban on “Assault Firearms” and “Large-Capacity Magazines”

Today, the U.S. Department of Justice filed an amicus brief in Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs v. Platkin—an NRA-backed challenge to New Jersey’s ban on so-called “assault firearms” and “large-capacity magazines.”

Update: North Carolina House Reschedules Veto Override Vote

Tuesday, August 26, 2025

Update: North Carolina House Reschedules Veto Override Vote

Today, the House rescheduled the veto override vote on Senate Bill 50, Freedom to Carry NC, to Monday, September 22. 

New York Law Imperils U.S. Olympic Target Shooting, Favors China’s Dominance

News  

Monday, September 15, 2025

New York Law Imperils U.S. Olympic Target Shooting, Favors China’s Dominance

As U.S. shooting sports athletes prepare for the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles, New York law is burdening target shooters in the Empire State.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.