Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

President Trump Reiterates Support for National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity and NRA

Monday, June 29, 2026

President Trump Reiterates Support for National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity and NRA

During remarks to American workers at a Mack Trucks facility in Macungie, Pa. on June 23, President Donald Trump reiterated his support for National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity and NRA.

The president singled out NRA President Bill Bachenberg for recognition and noted how he is working with NRA.  President Trump pointed out, “The NRA… they’ve been with me right from the beginning.”

The president then asked those gathered what they thought of National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity, federal legislation to ensure a state Right-to-Carry permit is honored throughout the country, which elicited enthusiastic applause. President Trump then stated, “National Right-to-Carry, we’re working on it.”

Just as NRA has been with President Trump right from the beginning, the president has been right on National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity from the beginning. In a September 2015 policy paper, Trump explained,

A driver's license works in every state, so it's common sense that a concealed carry permit should work in every state. If we can do that for driving - which is a privilege, not a right - then surely we can do that for concealed carry, which is a right, not a privilege.

National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity shouldn’t be controversial. Moreover, it’s good politics.

After the NRA-supported victory in the U.S. Supreme Court case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022), Right-to-Carry is the law of the land. The Court made clear that law-abiding Americans have a Right-to-Carry outside the home for self-defense and that governments can’t deny this right, either entirely or with the use of subjective permitting criteria. More recently, the U.S. Supreme Court reiterated its defense of the Right-to-Carry for self-defense in Wolford v. Lopez (2026), striking down a Hawaii law that made all private property open to the public gun-free zones by default.

Right-to-Carry is popular. A Marquette Law School poll from the summer of 2024 asked respondents,

In 2022, the Supreme Court ruled that, subject to some restrictions, the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home. How much do you favor or oppose this decision?

An overwhelming 69-percent responded that they favored the ruling.

This popularity is why the Right-to-Carry was already the law in the vast majority of the country before Bruen. Prior to the Bruen decision, 42 states respected the Right-to-Carry.

It’s no wonder that the Right-to-Carry has flourished.

A 2023 Gallup poll showed that 64-percent of Americans believe homes with a firearm are safer. That same year, an NBC News poll found that more than half of American voters lived in gun-owning households – likely to be a severe undercount. A Pew Research Center survey from 2023 found that 72-percent of gun owners cited protection as a “major reason” they own a gun and 91-percent cited it as a “major” or “minor” reason.

And Americans do use firearms to defend themselves. Research on defensive gun uses estimates that Americans defend themselves using firearms several hundreds of thousands to millions of times each year.

It’s only logical for Americans to understand that the utility a firearm provides for self-defense extends outside the home.

Further, Right-to-Carry permit holders have proven themselves trustworthy. Examining permit revocation data for his annual “Concealed Carry Permit Holders Across the United States” report, Economist John Lott determined, “Even given the low conviction rate for police, concealed carry permit holders are even more law-abiding than police.” In 2004, Congress enacted the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act, which wisely allows law enforcement officers and qualified retired law enforcement to carry throughout the country.

Today, most states allow visitors to carry in their jurisdictions. In fact, the majority of states (29) have Constitutional Carry, allowing visitors to carry without a permit.

In many ways, the success of Constitutional Carry is National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity’s best argument. Just as the Wild West scenarios predicted by gun control advocates at the outset of the Right-to-Carry movement in 1987 in Florida never materialized, recognizing law-abiding citizens’ Right-to-Carry without a permit hasn’t led to anarchy either.

With the Right-to-Carry now constitutional law and 29 Constitutional Carry states, the murder rate is at a 125-year low. U.S. Department of Justice statistics (2024) show the state with the lowest homicide rate, New Hampshire, and a majority of the top ten lowest have Constitutional Carry. The same goes for state rankings on violent crime, with Constitutional Carry Maine sneaking just past Constitutional Carry New Hampshire for the lowest violent crime rate.

As it turns out, dangerous criminals willing to misuse firearms to harm others never cared about gun control laws and prophylactic restrictions on the law-abiding only succeed in diminishing Constitutional rights and subjecting decent people to danger.

At this point, the Senate politics of National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity should be a no-brainer. With 29 Constitutional Carry states, there should be 58 Senate votes for reciprocity right off the bat. Those 58 Senators, along with those from another state that has outright recognition of carry permits would be enough to get past a Senate filibuster.

After all, supporting National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity could only enhance the rights of these senators’ own constituents by providing them with the same rights that their states already offer visitors. That’s, of course, if all these senators were concerned with serving their own constituents and not out of state anti-gun interests.

President Trump is right to emphasize National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity as a policy that’s time has come. NRA-ILA looks forward to continuing to work with President Trump to enact this commonsense measure.

TRENDING NOW
“Derivative Disarmament” – A “No Fault” Loss of Gun Rights

News  

Monday, September 14, 2026

“Derivative Disarmament” – A “No Fault” Loss of Gun Rights

One of the aftereffects of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in NYSRPA v. Bruen was the ire expressed by antigun lawmakers, executives and judges, which manifested as an outright unwillingness to respect the ...

Promise to Practice: Federal Firearm Rights Restoration is Now a Reality

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Promise to Practice: Federal Firearm Rights Restoration is Now a Reality

The federal government’s promise to provide a pathway to restore firearm rights is no longer merely a commitment on paper. 

Redditors Embarrass Virginia Assembly’s Chief Gun Banner

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Redditors Embarrass Virginia Assembly’s Chief Gun Banner

In late August, Virginia State Delegate Dan Helmer (D-10), who represents a portion of the Northern Virginia D.C. suburb of Fairfax County, took to Reddit for an “ask me anything” (AMA) question and answer session.

Remembering NRA Benefactor John Mascari II from Indianapolis, Indiana

Take Action  

Monday, September 14, 2026

Remembering NRA Benefactor John Mascari II from Indianapolis, Indiana

John was a dedicated NRA volunteer, recruiter, and FrontLines Activist Leader (FAL) whose commitment to protecting the Second Amendment touched many people throughout central Indiana.

Virginia Case Shows Gun Control is Aimed at Decent Citizens, Not Criminals

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Virginia Case Shows Gun Control is Aimed at Decent Citizens, Not Criminals

Economics has a concept called “revealed preference.” The gist is that a person’s observed actions reveal more about their preferences than what a person might profess to favor. 

Unhealthy Exposure: Gun Ban Advocates Allergic to Defensive Gun Use

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Unhealthy Exposure: Gun Ban Advocates Allergic to Defensive Gun Use

One of the narratives invented by gun control activists and their political allies to try to make their agenda more palatable to the general public has been to recast gun crime as a “public health ...

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

In another major victory for the National Rifle Association and law-abiding gun owners, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas today held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for ...

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS to Hear Challenge to Minnesota’s Refusal to Recognize Out-of-State Carry Permits

Tuesday, September 15, 2026

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS to Hear Challenge to Minnesota’s Refusal to Recognize Out-of-State Carry Permits

The National Rifle Association joined the Second Amendment Foundation, California Rifle & Pistol Association, Second Amendment Law Center, Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus, and Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms in filing ...

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

News  

Monday, August 17, 2026

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

On August 12, we reported on an important development in the ongoing litigation over the National Firearms Act (NFA) filed by multiple plaintiffs in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. These included, ...

What Does the Texas NFA Decision Mean for You?

News  

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

What Does the Texas NFA Decision Mean for You?

On August 5, 2026, Judge Wesley Hendrix of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.