Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Florida Alert! Universal Background Checks, a Path to Gun Confiscation

Saturday, February 2, 2019

 

DATE: February 2, 2019
TO:       USF & NRA Members and Friends
FROM:  Marion P. Hammer
  USF Executive Director 
  NRA Past President

 

HB-135 Universal Background Checks by Rep. Margaret Good (D)

HB 135 - Transfers of Firearms by Rep. Margaret Good (D) prohibits the TRANSFER of a firearm from one law-abiding citizen to another without first having a background check performed by a licensed firearms dealer.  

Transfer means sale, giving, lending, renting, or simply handing a firearm to another person or any action that causes a firearm to be transferred from one law-abiding person to another law-abiding person.  

In other words, you must go to a licensed firearms dealer to have a background check done on your best friend just to lend him a hunting rifle to go on a hunting trip. You must also pay the dealer an administrative fee PLUS the background check fee charged by FDLE. 

Then, before your best friend can return the firearm to you, you must go back to the dealer and the dealer must do a background check on YOU to simply give you back your own gun -- AND pay another set of fees.

The bill also contains a “head-fake.”  Right up front, is a definition:  “Adult family member means an individual’s spouse, parent, child, sibling, grandparent, grandchild, niece, nephew, first cousin, aunt, or uncle who is over 21 years of age.”  

As must have been anticipated, many folks wrongfully think there is an exemption that allows you to lend or otherwise transfer a firearm to “an adult family member.”  A careful reading of the bill shows that the exemption ONLY applies if that person LIVES WITH YOU and the transfer is for NO MORE THAN 14 DAYS.

Even though HB-135 requires the person transferring the firearm to pay a licensed firearms dealer any amount of fees demanded by the dealer, nothing in the bill requires any dealer, anywhere to do background checks on private transfers, period!  

The bill sponsor must assume that dealers will be eager to accommodate this gun control measure because they have an opportunity to make as much money as they choose while implementing the liberal left's gun control schemes.  Then there’s this:

 

Confiscation of Firearms under HB-135


Pretend your name is John Smith and you want to give a family shotgun to your son, John Smith, Jr.  (It doesn't matter what your name is, this could happen to you and FDLE's or NCIC's mistake could result in your gun being confiscated).

STEP 1.  You go to your local licensed gun dealer for a background check on your son, as required by this bill.  

STEP 2.  You must then sign over ownership of your shotgun to the dealer before he can legally run a background check.

STEP 3.  The dealer charges you $50 (or more – as much as he chooses) to do the background check on your son.  

STEP 4.  FDLE’s background check on your son confuses him for a John Smith with a criminal record: FDLE denies a transfer.  

STEP 5.  Before the shotgun can be returned to you, the dealer must first do a background check on you.

STEP 6.  The dealer charges you $50 (or more – as much as he chooses) to do a background check on you.

STEP 7.  FDLE confuses you with the same John Smith as your son, so FDLE denies the transfer of your gun back to you.

STEP 8.  Your shotgun must then be CONFISCATED by the dealer.

STEP 9.  Within 24 Hours, the dealer must deliver your shotgun to the Sheriff. (After doing a background check on the Sheriff)

STEP 10.  FDLE does nothing to correct the mistake.

STEP 11.  Unless YOU can PROVE that FDLE made a mistake, in 6 months your shotgun is forever forfeited to “the state” with no compensation whatever. There is no mandate that your shotgun be properly maintained while in “custody.” 

BOTTOM LINE: You have paid a dealer $100; you and your son have been labeled criminals by FDLE; your shotgun has been confiscated.  That’s only some of what Rep. Good’s bill would do if it passes.

 

READ THE BILL HERE: 

https://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Documents/loaddoc.aspx?FileName=_h0135__.docx&DocumentType=Bill&BillNumber=0135&Session=2019

TRENDING NOW
California Glock Ban Triggers Warning from Trump DOJ

News  

Monday, June 29, 2026

California Glock Ban Triggers Warning from Trump DOJ

Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ), continues to play offense when it comes to the Trump administration defending the Second Amendment.

Florida Court: Young Adult Carry Ban Reduces the Second Amendment to a “Second-Class Right”

News  

Monday, June 29, 2026

Florida Court: Young Adult Carry Ban Reduces the Second Amendment to a “Second-Class Right”

A recent court decision adds Florida to the list of some 14 constitutional (“permitless”) carry states in which adults under the age of 21 may legally carry firearms. 

NRA Secures Statewide Preliminary Injunction Against Virginia “Assault Firearm” and Magazine Bans

Monday, June 29, 2026

NRA Secures Statewide Preliminary Injunction Against Virginia “Assault Firearm” and Magazine Bans

In a major victory for the right to keep and bear arms, the Washington Circuit Court today granted a statewide preliminary injunction preventing enforcement of Virginia’s newly enacted “assault firearm” and magazine bans, finding that ...

President Trump Reiterates Support for National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity and NRA

News  

Monday, June 29, 2026

President Trump Reiterates Support for National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity and NRA

During remarks to American workers at a Mack Trucks facility in Macungie, Pa. on June 23, President Donald Trump reiterated his support for National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity and NRA.  

“Red Flag” Law Claimed to Work Simply Because it is Being Used

News  

Monday, June 29, 2026

“Red Flag” Law Claimed to Work Simply Because it is Being Used

According to a recent editorial by an anti-gun spokesman, Florida’s version of a “red flag” law—also known as an Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) law—is a “success” simply because it is being used.

Arizona state flag

Monday, June 22, 2026

Arizona: Governor Hobbs Vetoes Pro-Gun Legislation...Again

On Friday, June 19, Governor Katie Hobbs (D), vetoed Senate Bill 1068 and Senate Bill 1069. For those keeping score at home, this marks not the first, nor the second, but the third time Governor ...

Second Amendment: 1. “Aloha Spirit:” 0. High Court Shoots Down Hawaii Gun Ban.

Thursday, June 25, 2026

Second Amendment: 1. “Aloha Spirit:” 0. High Court Shoots Down Hawaii Gun Ban.

On June 25, the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated a Hawaii law that sought to ban the carrying of firearms (including licensed concealed carry) on private property open to the public, unless the carrier obtained affirmative ...

California: Anti-Gun Bills Continue Advancing in Sacramento

Wednesday, June 24, 2026

California: Anti-Gun Bills Continue Advancing in Sacramento

Anti-gun legislation continues advancing in Sacramento. On June 30, the Assembly Public Safety Committee will hear Senate Bill 948, while the Senate Public Safety Committee will hear Assembly Bill 2047. Please use the Take Action ...

Virginia: Democrats Kick the Can on Unconstitutional Boondoggle with Spanberger Budget Amendment

Monday, June 29, 2026

Virginia: Democrats Kick the Can on Unconstitutional Boondoggle with Spanberger Budget Amendment

Today, the Virginia General Assembly met in Richmond to approve or deny Governor Spanberger's proposed Amendments to the state budget. 

SCOTUS Agrees to Hear Challenges to “Assault Weapon” Bans

Wednesday, July 1, 2026

SCOTUS Agrees to Hear Challenges to “Assault Weapon” Bans

Today, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in two cases challenging bans on “assault weapons.”

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.