Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Florida Alert! 30 Florida Cities and Counties Think They are ABOVE THE LAW

Thursday, December 26, 2019

 

DATE:    December 26, 2019
TO:         USF & NRA Members and Friends
FROM:    Marion P. Hammer
  USF Executive Director
  NRA Past President

 

How does it feel knowing that in at least 30 Cities and Counties, elected Commissioners and local government officials think they have a right to knowingly and willfully violate State law and not be punished?

In 30 local governments they are spending tax dollars to fight the State for passing a law to punish them for intentionally violating state law. 

Tax payers are actually being represented by Commissioners who THINK they are above the law and are spending tax dollars to try to overturn a law that punishes them for intentionally breaking the law. 

THE ISSUE IS NOT IMPORTANT.  THE ATTITUDE AND CULTURE WHERE CITY & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THINK THEY ARE ABOVE THE LAW IS THE PROBLEM.  It is a clear cultivation of lawlessness for the arrogant, elitist running these local governments.  

Being elected to office doesn't mean they have immunity from being held accountable for intentionally breaking the law.  Being elected means they must be held to at least the same standard of conduct as those who trusted them with their vote. 

BE AWARE: Dozens of City and County Commissioners think they are better than you.  They think they are above the law. They are spending hard earned tax dollars to sue the State for expecting local government officials to obey the law just like you and everybody else.   

Attorneys for dozens of cities - including Tallahassee, the Capitol of Florida - filed a brief urging the 1st District Court of Appeal to rule that local government officials can intentionally break Florida State law and not be punished. 

 

Reprinted with Permission

December 24, 2019

Jim Saunders 

TALLAHASSEE - Describing the law as an “unnecessary and unconstitutional overreach,” cities and counties argue that an appeals court should reject a 2011 state law that threatens tough penalties if local elected officials approve gun regulations. 

Attorneys for dozens of cities, counties and local officials filed a brief Monday urging the 1st District Court of Appeal to uphold a lower-court decision that found the law unconstitutional. Challenges to the law were filed after the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, as local governments looked for ways to curb gun violence. 

The brief Monday said the threatened penalties violate legal immunities provided to local officials as they make policy decisions. 

“These immunities underscore our republican form of government in which citizens choose their elected officials, who are then duty-bound to represent their constituents’ interests through legislative and regulatory initiatives,” the 54-page brief said. “Without immunity from liability, officials and localities are understandably likely to refrain from acting on matters they reasonably believe are both permissible and in the interest of their constituents, for fear of professional and financial ruin if it is later determined their belief was mistaken.” 

Florida since 1987 has barred cities and counties from passing regulations that are stricter than state firearms laws, a concept known as “preemption” of local gun laws. The 2011 law was designed to strengthen the preemption by adding penalties, such as the possibility of local officials facing $5,000 fines and potential removal from office for passing gun regulations. 

The legal battle is not about the underlying 1987 preemption law. 

But the penalties law was challenged by 30 cities, three counties and more than 70 elected officials, according to Monday’s brief. That includes cities such as Miami Beach, Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Orlando, St. Petersburg, Gainesville and Tallahassee. 

Leon County Circuit Judge Charles Dodson in July found parts of the law unconstitutional, citing issues related to “legislative immunity,” which protects local government officials in their decision-making processes. He also pointed to the constitutional separation of powers, as judges could be asked to rule on penalizing local officials. 

Lawyers for Attorney General Ashley Moody and Gov. Ron DeSantis took the case to the Tallahassee-based 1st District Court of Appeal and argued that Dodson’s ruling should be overturned. In a brief last month, they cited a “hierarchical relationship” between the state and local governments and said the Florida Constitution “subjugates local governments’ authority to that of the Florida Legislature.”

 

 

 

 

 

TRENDING NOW
Canadian Criminologist: “Almost All of the U.S. is Safer than Toronto”

News  

Monday, June 15, 2026

Canadian Criminologist: “Almost All of the U.S. is Safer than Toronto”

Canada’s Liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney recently defended his government’s gun confiscation and “buyback” program, stating the government “has acted swiftly and decisively to combat gun crime” by removing “prohibited assault-style firearms from communities across ...

New York’s Penn Station: “Sensitive Place” or a “Disgusting” “Hellhole”?

News  

Monday, June 15, 2026

New York’s Penn Station: “Sensitive Place” or a “Disgusting” “Hellhole”?

Another week, another grotesque act of violence in one of New York’s least sensitive places.

Credibility Crisis Facing Violence Interruption Programs Continues

News  

Monday, June 15, 2026

Credibility Crisis Facing Violence Interruption Programs Continues

Few things expose the hypocrisy of anti-gun activists and their allies more clearly than the recurring spectacle of so-called “violence interrupters” and their own violent tendencies. The story has become repetitive but worth reiterating because ...

UN Officials Declare “We Have Lawyers” After Forcing Through Another Controversial Small Arms Outcome Document

News  

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

UN Officials Declare “We Have Lawyers” After Forcing Through Another Controversial Small Arms Outcome Document

The United Nations’ Ninth Biennial Meeting of States to Consider the Implementation of the Program of Action to Prevent, Combat, and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects ...

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging Michigan’s License-to-Purchase Regime

Monday, June 15, 2026

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging Michigan’s License-to-Purchase Regime

The National Rifle Association, Michigan Coalition for Responsible Gun Owners, Michigan Gun Owners, Michigan Open Carry, and four NRA members filed a lawsuit challenging Michigan’s firearm license-to-purchase and registration regime.

Massachusetts: Sunday Hunting Back on the Table, TAKE ACTION NOW!

Thursday, June 18, 2026

Massachusetts: Sunday Hunting Back on the Table, TAKE ACTION NOW!

Yesterday, after immense pressure from sportsmen and women across the state, the provisions regarding Sunday hunting, crossbow hunting, and archery setbacks that were stripped from the House budget were added back to a bond bill. 

Up Next for DOJ’s Second Amendment Section: Philadelphia

News  

Monday, June 15, 2026

Up Next for DOJ’s Second Amendment Section: Philadelphia

Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ), has been doing yeoman’s work in the defense of the Second Amendment.

New York:  Gov. Kathy Hochul Signs Gun Ban in State Budget Process

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

New York: Gov. Kathy Hochul Signs Gun Ban in State Budget Process

On Wednesday, May 27, Gov. Kathy Hochul signed S.9005C, which “enacts into law major components” of the state’s public protection and general government budget.

California: Anti-Gun Bills Advance, More Scheduled Next Week

Wednesday, June 17, 2026

California: Anti-Gun Bills Advance, More Scheduled Next Week

Anti-gun legislation continues advancing in Sacramento. This week, the Senate Public Safety Committee advanced Assembly Bills 1743 and 1753, while postponing consideration of AB 1810, the FFL Killer Bill, until June 23. On that same ...

Supreme Court Holds Oral Arguments in Marijuana Related Firearm Prohibition Case

News  

Monday, March 9, 2026

Supreme Court Holds Oral Arguments in Marijuana Related Firearm Prohibition Case

On March 2, the U.S. Supreme Court held oral arguments in U.S. v Hemani, a case concerning the federal firearm prohibition on marijuana users. 

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.