Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Corporate Gun Control: The San Francisco Sneak

Monday, February 1, 2021

Corporate Gun Control: The San Francisco Sneak

San Francisco boomed during the Gold Rush and had been a symbol of American ingenuity and prosperity. Now it’s home to would-be corporate overlords. These autocrats use their market dominance to threaten and shut down lawful businesses that engage in – or even with – industries that displease them. They’re more than willing to bend or misapply their own declared rules if it means hurting the “right” people or industries.

Rosanna and Michael Sharps ran a gift shop in the Sierra Nevada foothills selling memorabilia like that which visitors could have found in shops during the Gold Rush. They sold clothing, books, and toys. They don’t sell firearms; they sell non-firing replicas of 18th and 19th century firearms that cannot be modified into a working firearm. These are display pieces and toys.

This merchandise was approved by the California Department of Parks and Recreation, which granted the Sharps the contract to operate their shop in the Columbia State Historic Park. If a California government agency authorized the replica firearms, it can safely be assumed that these are in no way remotely close to an actual firearm. 

Just as the Parks Department contracted with the Sharps to run the shop, the Sharps contracted with Square, Inc., for the services necessary to run a modern business. They used Square for “cash register, payment processing, an e-commerce website, shipping services, gift cards, rewards program, customer feedback, curbside pickup, marketing campaigns, and payroll services.”

After two years of building their business around the Square platform, Square terminated the Sharps’ account. The Sharps believe the non-firing replicas and toys sparked the ire of Square, but the corporation won’t give them a specific reason. The Sharps were forced to shut down both their physical shop and their online store

Square is run by the same CEO as Twitter – Jack Dorsey. Dorsey is quite willing to limit access to his platforms – which the small businesses like the Sharps’ paid for – based on his own shifting personal agenda. Dorsey uses unpredictable and arbitrary reasoning to spontaneously terminate his clients’ accounts on Square.

Dorsey and anti-gun, anti-freedom people like him are entitled to their views. The astounding piece of this story is that Dorsey’s company did business with the Sharps for two years before determining that the Sharps’ existing merchandise was displeasing to those in the San Francisco tower. We’ve seen this story before, though usually companies like Square go after firearms manufacturers or sellers. Now they’re targeting a small business for selling toys deemed acceptable by California.

Square claims that they “believe everyone should be able to participate and thrive in the economy.” That should be amended to “everyone who does not believe in, or appear to believe in, the individual right to keep and bear arms.”

The Sharps violated no law and yet their business has been shut down. Cutting off financial services is a path favored by the professional anti-gun activist class, who have not been able to have their gun control dreams enacted by law. If gun shops and manufacturers cannot be outlawed, the gun controllers seek to make them impossible to operate. Efforts to change the American tradition of gun ownership, to shift the gun-owning culture of the United States, catch small businesses like the Sharps’ that have nothing to do with operational firearms. 

We know the Biden Administration wants to overturn the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act that protects firearms manufacturers and sellers from frivolous lawsuits designed to bankrupt them.  Only time will tell if President Biden permanently blocks the protections against discrimination in banking President Trump established. 

If Biden clears the path to corporate gun control, your rights will be nullified at San Francisco cocktail parties.

Law-abiding gun owners won’t be invited. Other than the security guards hired to protect the corporate overlords, that is.

IN THIS ARTICLE
California Twitter
TRENDING NOW
Second Amendment: 1. “Aloha Spirit:” 0. High Court Shoots Down Hawaii Gun Ban.

Thursday, June 25, 2026

Second Amendment: 1. “Aloha Spirit:” 0. High Court Shoots Down Hawaii Gun Ban.

On June 25, the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated a Hawaii law that sought to ban the carrying of firearms (including licensed concealed carry) on private property open to the public, unless the carrier obtained affirmative ...

U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Narrows Scope of Unlawful Drug User Prohibition

News  

Monday, June 22, 2026

U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Narrows Scope of Unlawful Drug User Prohibition

On June 18, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion which unanimously narrowed the scope of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), which bans firearm acquisition or possession by anyone who is an “unlawful user” of a ...

Anti-Gun Municipalities Double-Down When Policies Are Challenged

News  

Monday, June 22, 2026

Anti-Gun Municipalities Double-Down When Policies Are Challenged

Why is it that, after being told their gun laws are unconstitutional, so many areas under control of anti-gun extremists seem to respond with something along the lines of, “Oh yeah?  Watch what we do next!” 

Delaware: FFL Killer Bill Passes House, Heads to Governor’s Desk

Friday, June 26, 2026

Delaware: FFL Killer Bill Passes House, Heads to Governor’s Desk

Yesterday, the Delaware House of Representatives passed Senate Bill 300, sending the “FFL Killer” bill to Governor Matt Meyer’s desk.

New York:  Gov. Kathy Hochul Signs Gun Ban in State Budget Process

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

New York: Gov. Kathy Hochul Signs Gun Ban in State Budget Process

On Wednesday, May 27, Gov. Kathy Hochul signed S.9005C, which “enacts into law major components” of the state’s public protection and general government budget.

California: Anti-Gun Bills Advance, More Scheduled Next Week

Wednesday, June 17, 2026

California: Anti-Gun Bills Advance, More Scheduled Next Week

Anti-gun legislation continues advancing in Sacramento. This week, the Senate Public Safety Committee advanced Assembly Bills 1743 and 1753, while postponing consideration of AB 1810, the FFL Killer Bill, until June 23. On that same ...

Massachusetts: Sunday Hunting Back on the Table, TAKE ACTION NOW!

Thursday, June 18, 2026

Massachusetts: Sunday Hunting Back on the Table, TAKE ACTION NOW!

Yesterday, after immense pressure from sportsmen and women across the state, the provisions regarding Sunday hunting, crossbow hunting, and archery setbacks that were stripped from the House budget were added back to a bond bill. 

California: Anti-Gun Bills Continue Advancing in Sacramento

Wednesday, June 24, 2026

California: Anti-Gun Bills Continue Advancing in Sacramento

Anti-gun legislation continues advancing in Sacramento. On June 30, the Assembly Public Safety Committee will hear Senate Bill 948, while the Senate Public Safety Committee will hear Assembly Bill 2047. Please use the Take Action ...

Arizona state flag

Monday, June 22, 2026

Arizona: Governor Hobbs Vetoes Pro-Gun Legislation...Again

On Friday, June 19, Governor Katie Hobbs (D), vetoed Senate Bill 1068 and Senate Bill 1069. For those keeping score at home, this marks not the first, nor the second, but the third time Governor ...

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging Michigan’s License-to-Purchase Regime

Monday, June 15, 2026

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging Michigan’s License-to-Purchase Regime

The National Rifle Association, Michigan Coalition for Responsible Gun Owners, Michigan Gun Owners, Michigan Open Carry, and four NRA members filed a lawsuit challenging Michigan’s firearm license-to-purchase and registration regime.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.