Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Canada’s Liberals Bypass Parliament to Further Gun Control Agenda

Monday, August 15, 2022

Canada’s Liberals Bypass Parliament to Further Gun Control Agenda

Earlier this year, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government introduced Bill C-21, proposing a permanent freeze on the sale, transfer and import of handguns in Canada. The bill remains at the initial stages and did not pass prior to Parliament’s recess for the summer.

While the bill works its way through the parliamentary process, CBC news reports that the federal government is nonetheless “fast-track[ing] a ban on the import of handguns into the country without the approval of Parliament using a regulatory measure that comes into effect” on August 19, to “last until a permanent freeze is passed in Parliament and comes into force.” A government press release indicates that the “temporary” ban “will help bring the ultimate impact of the national handgun freeze into force sooner,” despite the fact that Bill C-21 has not been enacted.

Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly advised that she has the authority to deny any export or import permit application based on national security concerns. Referring to Marco Mendicino, the minister of public safety, she said, “we came up with this idea of creating this new system of requiring permits, but meanwhile, we will deny any permits from any commercial entity or people wanting to bring handguns to Canada… So this is how creatively we’ve worked…”

As nearly all handguns in Canada are imported, the real reason for this unilateral executive action is to preemptively stamp out individual handgun sales while they are still legal. One source indicates that “licensed firearm users bought almost 90,000 handguns in the seven weeks after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he’s killing the legal market, a shopping spree that set records,” and that by the first week of August, the total is likely to top 100,000 new sales. On August 5, a tweet by Ms. Joly on the intent of the “temporary” import ban couldn’t be clearer: “This will prevent shelves from being restocked, slowing the run on handguns to keep our communities safer.” 

In an interview with CBC News on August 5, Marco Mendicino was asked specifically about the “unilateral ban” imposed while the federal legislation remains pending. “Why [do] you think it is okay to do that without Parliament’s approval,” and again, “why not take the time that it will take to get all the necessary political support for this, rather than doing it on your own?” He replied, in part, that the goal is to save lives and that “the status quo is not acceptable…The idea is that we will continue to press forward without any hesitation to pass Bill C-21…but it has to be seen in the broader context of a comprehensive strategy.” “We’ve been very innovative and creative and this is not necessarily an intuitive legal measure that we have come up with. It is something that is unprecedented and it shows the lengths to which we’re going to leave and exhaust all options… to accelerate the progress that we want to make on this important agenda…” The message, it seems, is if it can be done without Parliament, it will be. 

One reason to avoid the regular legislative process is that the Conservative party and gun rights voters continue to oppose further and greater restrictions on responsible firearm licensees and the gun industry, claiming these will do little to stop the criminals committing gang and gun crimes. Raquel Dancho (Kildonan - St. Paul, MB), the Conservative Shadow Minister for Public Safety, said of Bill C-21 that, “the Liberals made it seem yet again that they are taking real action to keep communities safe, when in fact that is not the case.” Violent gun crimes have gone up in the seven years that Justin Trudeau has been Prime Minister, his government is “spending more money than any other government in history, and yet [the bill] will do nothing to address the rise of gun violence.” The evidence shows that “bans will not be effective,” because criminals who commit crimes will not comply with any bans.

Speaking of the new “temporary” import ban specifically, Ms. Dancho “accused the government of ‘attacking business owners and law-abiding citizens… Instead of addressing the true source of gun crime in Canada, the Liberal government is unilaterally banning imports without parliamentary input, impacting a multi-billion dollar industry and thousands of retailers and small businesses, with very little notice... [the import ban] will do nothing to stop the flow of illegal handguns.”

One real-life example that supports her argument occurred earlier this month, when police in Ontario uncovered a large-scale criminal network that was smuggling illegal guns (including handguns) along with large amounts of cocaine, heroin, fentanyl and other drugs into Canada. The chief of one of the police forces involved pointed out that his jurisdiction has only nine to 11 officers and one boat with which to patrol the border. Speaking to the Ontario Premier and to Prime Minister Trudeau, he asked for additional government help, for them to “flow the necessary adequate financial resources. We desperately need enhanced funding to get this job done.”

Canada’s gun owners are now familiar with the “unprecedented” lengths to which the Liberals are prepared to go to eliminate the lawful ownership of firearms. Bypassing Parliament to unilaterally impose expensive and futile gun control schemes is something of a hallmark of Justin Trudeau: more than two years ago, he imposed a sweeping “assault weapon ban” by means of a regulation. This misleading “temporary” handgun import ban, which the government’s own press release admits “will last until the national freeze comes into force” (even if that never happens) is just the latest example.

IN THIS ARTICLE
Canada handgun ban
TRENDING NOW
“Derivative Disarmament” – A “No Fault” Loss of Gun Rights

News  

Monday, September 14, 2026

“Derivative Disarmament” – A “No Fault” Loss of Gun Rights

One of the aftereffects of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in NYSRPA v. Bruen was the ire expressed by antigun lawmakers, executives and judges, which manifested as an outright unwillingness to respect the ...

Redditors Embarrass Virginia Assembly’s Chief Gun Banner

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Redditors Embarrass Virginia Assembly’s Chief Gun Banner

In late August, Virginia State Delegate Dan Helmer (D-10), who represents a portion of the Northern Virginia D.C. suburb of Fairfax County, took to Reddit for an “ask me anything” (AMA) question and answer session.

Remembering NRA Benefactor John Mascari II from Indianapolis, Indiana

Take Action  

Monday, September 14, 2026

Remembering NRA Benefactor John Mascari II from Indianapolis, Indiana

John was a dedicated NRA volunteer, recruiter, and FrontLines Activist Leader (FAL) whose commitment to protecting the Second Amendment touched many people throughout central Indiana.

Virginia Case Shows Gun Control is Aimed at Decent Citizens, Not Criminals

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Virginia Case Shows Gun Control is Aimed at Decent Citizens, Not Criminals

Economics has a concept called “revealed preference.” The gist is that a person’s observed actions reveal more about their preferences than what a person might profess to favor. 

Unhealthy Exposure: Gun Ban Advocates Allergic to Defensive Gun Use

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Unhealthy Exposure: Gun Ban Advocates Allergic to Defensive Gun Use

One of the narratives invented by gun control activists and their political allies to try to make their agenda more palatable to the general public has been to recast gun crime as a “public health ...

Promise to Practice: Federal Firearm Rights Restoration is Now a Reality

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Promise to Practice: Federal Firearm Rights Restoration is Now a Reality

The federal government’s promise to provide a pathway to restore firearm rights is no longer merely a commitment on paper. 

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Supreme Court “Assault Weapons” Cases

Saturday, September 5, 2026

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Supreme Court “Assault Weapons” Cases

The National Rifle Association, alongside the Independence Institute and the American Suppressor Association, filed an amicus brief on Friday in the consolidated cases Viramontes v. Cook County and Grant v. Higgins, which challenge the "assault weapons” bans ...

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

In another major victory for the National Rifle Association and law-abiding gun owners, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas today held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for ...

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

News  

Monday, August 17, 2026

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

On August 12, we reported on an important development in the ongoing litigation over the National Firearms Act (NFA) filed by multiple plaintiffs in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. These included, ...

What Does the Texas NFA Decision Mean for You?

News  

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

What Does the Texas NFA Decision Mean for You?

On August 5, 2026, Judge Wesley Hendrix of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.