Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Reported ATF Email Sparks Concerns of Braced Pistol Crackdown

Monday, January 13, 2025

Reported ATF Email Sparks Concerns of Braced Pistol Crackdown

On Friday, Gun Owners of America published an email reportedly received by one of its members in response to a question to ATF about whether adding a brace to a CZ Scorpion pistol would convert the gun into a short barreled rifle for purposes of the National Firearms Act (NFA). The email appears to claim that, notwithstanding the nationwide injunction against ATFs rule Factoring Criteria for Firearms With Attached Stabilizing Braces,’” ATF now considers ALL braced pistols subject to the NFA, based on its reading of the underlying statutes.

As we reported at the time, ATF in January 2023 published a rule that changed over a decades worth of settled understanding about pistols with attached stabilizing braces, which in many cases could be made or sold without triggering the NFA. The new rule explicitly revoked all prior guidance and rulings on stabilizing braces. It then added a new clause to the regulatory definition of rifle,” which stated:

For purposes of this definition, the term “designed or redesigned, made or remade, and intended to be fired from the shoulder” shall include a weapon that is equipped with … a “stabilizing brace” … that provides surface area that allows the weapon to be fired from the shoulder, provided other factors, as described in paragraph (2), indicate that the weapon is designed, made, and intended to be fired from the shoulder.

These factors,” however, were almost entirely subjective and did not give owners of pistol braces or braced pistols any ascertainable means of determining whether their own set-up was included. A wrong guess, moreover, would be very consequential, as the NFA imposes felony penalties for possessing an SBR without complying with the acts registration and taxation requirements. Reduced to its essence, the rule seemed to say, We cant tell you when a braced pistol becomes an SBR. But well know it when we see it.”

The rule gave current owners of braced pistols that were previously understood to be lawful various options for compliance,” including such things as destroying the braced pistol or surrendering it to the government.

ATFs arbitrary and overreaching rule provoked multiple lawsuits, including one by the NRA. These cases have resulted in a series of injunctions. Notably, a federal court in Texas stayed nationwide enforcement of the rule in its entirety on Nov. 8, 2023. The government has appealed that ruling.

Yet an email exchange that occurred between the owner of a CZ Scorpion pistol and ATF in December is now coming to light suggesting that ATF intends, even without the rule, to treat ALL braced pistols as NFA-regulated SBRs.

When asked if adding a brace to the CZ Scorpion would turn it into an SBR subject to the NFA, the ATFs Firearm Industry Programs Branch (FIPB) reportedly replied: Federal law requires a pistol with an attached stabilizing brace or stock be registered as a short barreled rifle (SBR).”

This statement, if indeed it reflects current ATF understanding and enforcement policy, would constitute the agencys most aggressive posture on the issue to date, surpassing the already broad and punitive approach it took in its 2023 rule.

The purported FIPB response acknowledged that enforcement of this rule was enjoined, and asserted, While the appeal is pending, ATF is complying with the Courts order.”

Yet ATFs idea of compliance,” according to the email, is to assert an even broader authority to treat ALL braced pistols as SBRS (not just ones fulfilling the factoring criteria” specified in its rule), based on the agencys reading of the underlying statutes.

Thus, although several federal courts have now ordered ATF not to proceed with enforcement proceedings against braced pistol owners under the rule, the ATF is apparently reserving the right to treat these same gun owners as felons on other pretexts. And because those pretexts do not depend on the rule, they likely do not offer similar opportunities for owners of non-conforming guns to come into compliance.

It's important to note, however, that the email purportedly from FIPB is unsigned, it is not on agency letterhead, and it has not been published in the Federal Register (or even on ATFs website, apparently). Moreover, it deviates from a published rule the agency continues to defend in court.

It seems strange, to say the least, that ATF would go through the resource-intensive process of a publishing an official rule and defending it in multiple federal courts that asserts a narrower view of its authority than the agencys decision-makers believe it has. The factoring criteria, after all, leave open the possibility that at least some braced pistols would not qualify as SBRs. The email, by contrast, appears to assert a much broader, more categorical approach that all braced pistols fit this category.

It is possible, for example, that the email is a product of a single ATF employee who is trying to discourage a particular individual from adding a brace to a pistol and does not represent official agency policy. Nevertheless, whoever may have been involved in creating the email, the person or persons claims to have answered on behalf of the NFPB, generally.

As this article was being published, NRA-ILA was in the process of trying to verify the authenticity of the email and to determine whether it accurately states the ATFs current position and enforcement policy on braced pistols. We will report on further information as it becomes available.

TRENDING NOW
U.S. Court of Appeals Backtracks on Adverse Suppressor Ruling

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

U.S. Court of Appeals Backtracks on Adverse Suppressor Ruling

In a single sentence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit added to the high-profile and consequential national conversation on firearm suppressors.

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

News  

Second Amendment  

Thursday, May 22, 2025

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

Earlier today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R.1 the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which included Section 2 of the Hearing Protection Act, completely removing suppressors from the National Firearms Act (NFA).

2A News Out of New Jersey You Won’t Believe: It’s Actually a Good Thing!

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

2A News Out of New Jersey You Won’t Believe: It’s Actually a Good Thing!

The Garden State is not where most seek positive developments regarding our right to arms, so we were pleasantly surprised when Englishtown, N.J., recently made a move to support the Second Amendment.

Switched Off: A Case Study on Minnesota’s Illegal Machine Gun Law

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

Switched Off: A Case Study on Minnesota’s Illegal Machine Gun Law

There’s been a lot of noise of late about auto sears or so-called “Glock switches” – devices to convert a semiautomatic firearm into an automatic weapon. 

Update: Washington Post Fact Checks Misleading Ad Council “Children” and Firearms Talking Point

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

Update: Washington Post Fact Checks Misleading Ad Council “Children” and Firearms Talking Point

Last week, NRA-ILA explained how a recent public service announcement campaign from the federally-funded Ad Council, and the gun control lobby more broadly, manipulates statistics to create misleading talking points about “children” and firearms.

Minnesota: Shotgun-Only Hunting Zones Repealed

Friday, June 20, 2025

Minnesota: Shotgun-Only Hunting Zones Repealed

On Monday, June 9th, outside of regular session, the Senate passed the Environment Omnibus bill, removing shotgun-only hunting zones in the state. 

DOJ Files Amicus Brief Supporting NRA-Backed Challenge to IL’s Ban on “Assault Weapons” and “Large-Capacity Magazines”

Tuesday, June 17, 2025

DOJ Files Amicus Brief Supporting NRA-Backed Challenge to IL’s Ban on “Assault Weapons” and “Large-Capacity Magazines”

Last Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice filed an amicus brief in the Seventh Circuit supporting an NRA-backed challenge to Illinois’s prohibition on so-called “assault weapons” and “large-capacity magazines.”

Ninth Circuit Strikes Down CA’s One-Gun-A-Month Law

Friday, June 20, 2025

Ninth Circuit Strikes Down CA’s One-Gun-A-Month Law

Today, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that California’s law prohibiting people from buying more than one firearm in a 30-day period violates the Second Amendment.

North Carolina: Update on Gun Bills Moving through the General Assembly

Tuesday, June 24, 2025

North Carolina: Update on Gun Bills Moving through the General Assembly

Recently, House Bill 193 (H193) was reported favorably out of both the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Rules Committee, with amendments.

The Trace Marks a Birthday: Ten Years of Anti-gun Propaganda, Little to Show for It

News  

Monday, June 23, 2025

The Trace Marks a Birthday: Ten Years of Anti-gun Propaganda, Little to Show for It

On June 18, the anti-gun propaganda mill The Trace celebrated its tenth birthday with a self-congratulatory article entitled “How The Trace Came to Be and Other Stories From Our Early Days.” 

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.