Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Reported ATF Email Sparks Concerns of Braced Pistol Crackdown

Monday, January 13, 2025

Reported ATF Email Sparks Concerns of Braced Pistol Crackdown

On Friday, Gun Owners of America published an email reportedly received by one of its members in response to a question to ATF about whether adding a brace to a CZ Scorpion pistol would convert the gun into a short barreled rifle for purposes of the National Firearms Act (NFA). The email appears to claim that, notwithstanding the nationwide injunction against ATFs rule Factoring Criteria for Firearms With Attached Stabilizing Braces,’” ATF now considers ALL braced pistols subject to the NFA, based on its reading of the underlying statutes.

As we reported at the time, ATF in January 2023 published a rule that changed over a decades worth of settled understanding about pistols with attached stabilizing braces, which in many cases could be made or sold without triggering the NFA. The new rule explicitly revoked all prior guidance and rulings on stabilizing braces. It then added a new clause to the regulatory definition of rifle,” which stated:

For purposes of this definition, the term “designed or redesigned, made or remade, and intended to be fired from the shoulder” shall include a weapon that is equipped with … a “stabilizing brace” … that provides surface area that allows the weapon to be fired from the shoulder, provided other factors, as described in paragraph (2), indicate that the weapon is designed, made, and intended to be fired from the shoulder.

These factors,” however, were almost entirely subjective and did not give owners of pistol braces or braced pistols any ascertainable means of determining whether their own set-up was included. A wrong guess, moreover, would be very consequential, as the NFA imposes felony penalties for possessing an SBR without complying with the acts registration and taxation requirements. Reduced to its essence, the rule seemed to say, We cant tell you when a braced pistol becomes an SBR. But well know it when we see it.”

The rule gave current owners of braced pistols that were previously understood to be lawful various options for compliance,” including such things as destroying the braced pistol or surrendering it to the government.

ATFs arbitrary and overreaching rule provoked multiple lawsuits, including one by the NRA. These cases have resulted in a series of injunctions. Notably, a federal court in Texas stayed nationwide enforcement of the rule in its entirety on Nov. 8, 2023. The government has appealed that ruling.

Yet an email exchange that occurred between the owner of a CZ Scorpion pistol and ATF in December is now coming to light suggesting that ATF intends, even without the rule, to treat ALL braced pistols as NFA-regulated SBRs.

When asked if adding a brace to the CZ Scorpion would turn it into an SBR subject to the NFA, the ATFs Firearm Industry Programs Branch (FIPB) reportedly replied: Federal law requires a pistol with an attached stabilizing brace or stock be registered as a short barreled rifle (SBR).”

This statement, if indeed it reflects current ATF understanding and enforcement policy, would constitute the agencys most aggressive posture on the issue to date, surpassing the already broad and punitive approach it took in its 2023 rule.

The purported FIPB response acknowledged that enforcement of this rule was enjoined, and asserted, While the appeal is pending, ATF is complying with the Courts order.”

Yet ATFs idea of compliance,” according to the email, is to assert an even broader authority to treat ALL braced pistols as SBRS (not just ones fulfilling the factoring criteria” specified in its rule), based on the agencys reading of the underlying statutes.

Thus, although several federal courts have now ordered ATF not to proceed with enforcement proceedings against braced pistol owners under the rule, the ATF is apparently reserving the right to treat these same gun owners as felons on other pretexts. And because those pretexts do not depend on the rule, they likely do not offer similar opportunities for owners of non-conforming guns to come into compliance.

It's important to note, however, that the email purportedly from FIPB is unsigned, it is not on agency letterhead, and it has not been published in the Federal Register (or even on ATFs website, apparently). Moreover, it deviates from a published rule the agency continues to defend in court.

It seems strange, to say the least, that ATF would go through the resource-intensive process of a publishing an official rule and defending it in multiple federal courts that asserts a narrower view of its authority than the agencys decision-makers believe it has. The factoring criteria, after all, leave open the possibility that at least some braced pistols would not qualify as SBRs. The email, by contrast, appears to assert a much broader, more categorical approach that all braced pistols fit this category.

It is possible, for example, that the email is a product of a single ATF employee who is trying to discourage a particular individual from adding a brace to a pistol and does not represent official agency policy. Nevertheless, whoever may have been involved in creating the email, the person or persons claims to have answered on behalf of the NFPB, generally.

As this article was being published, NRA-ILA was in the process of trying to verify the authenticity of the email and to determine whether it accurately states the ATFs current position and enforcement policy on braced pistols. We will report on further information as it becomes available.

TRENDING NOW
Ninth Circuit Strikes Down California’s Background Check Requirement for Ammunition Purchases in NRA Backed Case

Thursday, July 24, 2025

Ninth Circuit Strikes Down California’s Background Check Requirement for Ammunition Purchases in NRA Backed Case

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that California’s law requiring a background check for each ammunition purchase violates the Second Amendment in Rhode v. Bonta—a case backed by the National Rifle Association and California Rifle ...

Newsom’s Nonsense: Reassuring Words Pale Next to Anti-Second Amendment Record

News  

Monday, July 21, 2025

Newsom’s Nonsense: Reassuring Words Pale Next to Anti-Second Amendment Record

By now, Americans should be well aware that California Governor Gavin Newsom struggles with the truth. Recently, the known fabulist took his act on the road to sit with Tennessee-based podcaster Shawn Ryan for an interview.

Designed to Fail? Permit Processing in the City of Angels

News  

Monday, July 21, 2025

Designed to Fail? Permit Processing in the City of Angels

Even as the majority of states embrace constitutional carry (29 so far), California continues to make it more difficult for its responsible residents to carry a firearm for lawful self-defense. 

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

News  

Second Amendment  

Thursday, May 22, 2025

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

Earlier today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R.1 the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which included Section 2 of the Hearing Protection Act, completely removing suppressors from the National Firearms Act (NFA).

Legacy Media Finally Acknowledges Politization of Public Health

News  

Monday, July 14, 2025

Legacy Media Finally Acknowledges Politization of Public Health

It appears the editors of The Atlantic are finally willing to entertain an idea that has long been obvious to gun rights supporters.

House Natural Resources Committee Advances Key Hunting Bills

News  

Tuesday, July 15, 2025

House Natural Resources Committee Advances Key Hunting Bills

On July 15, 2025, the House Natural Resources Committee advanced two NRA-ILA supported bills — the Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act (H.R. 556) sponsored by Rep. Rob Wittman (R-VA-1), and the Grizzly Bear ...

Minnesota: Shotgun-Only Hunting Zones Repealed

Friday, June 20, 2025

Minnesota: Shotgun-Only Hunting Zones Repealed

On Monday, June 9th, outside of regular session, the Senate passed the Environment Omnibus bill, removing shotgun-only hunting zones in the state. 

North Carolina: Update on Gun Bills Moving through the General Assembly

Tuesday, June 24, 2025

North Carolina: Update on Gun Bills Moving through the General Assembly

Recently, House Bill 193 (H193) was reported favorably out of both the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Rules Committee, with amendments.

President Trump Signs the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” into Law

News  

Friday, July 4, 2025

President Trump Signs the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” into Law

Earlier today, on the 4th of July, a day on which our Founding Fathers declared their intent for a free nation, the President of the United State of America, Donald Trump, signed the “One Big ...

NRA and 2A Allies Announce NFA Lawsuit

Monday, July 7, 2025

NRA and 2A Allies Announce NFA Lawsuit

Following the passage of the “One Big Beautiful Bill”—which eliminates the National Firearms Act of 1934’s (NFA) excise tax on suppressors, short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and AOWs—the National Rifle Association issued a joint statement along with the ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.