Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Outrage(s) of the Week

Friday, October 4, 2013

Regular readers know that we report with great frequency on a veritable parade of ridiculous cases involving over-zealous school officials and their over-the-top enforcement of "zero-tolerance" rules.  Well, here we go again. 

This week, we have not one, but four outrageous incidents of ridiculously enforced zero-tolerance policies to report.  So, depending on your perspective, either the bar you hoped would not go any lower has dropped yet another peg, or--alternatively--the "asinine enforcement index" has now reached a new high.

Our first case involves a California high school student who was confronted by Canyon High School officials and told to change her NRA T-shirt because the officials deemed the shirt a violation the school's dress code, which forbids offensive, violent or divisive clothing.

According to a CBS Los Angeles story, Sophomore Haley Bullwinkle wore her NRA shirt to school last month, and ended up in the principal's office.  "They were treating me like I was a criminal," she said, noting that school officials would not allow her to wear the shirt "because it promoted gun violence."

The NRA shirt was given to her by her father and features images of a deer, the American flag and the silhouette of a hunter.  Written on the shirt are the words "National Rifle Association of America: Protecting America's Traditions Since 1871."

According to a Los Angeles Times article, when Haley's parents wrote to the school's principal, suggesting that administrators had infringed on their daughter's constitutional rights, Principal Kimberly Fricker responded by sending the parents the school's policy on clothing that "depicts violence."

According to the policy, that includes " anything that is divisive or offensive to a staff member."  It also states: "The administration reserves the right to restrict any clothing or accessories that in our judgment detracts from the educational environment of Canyon High School."

Civil rights attorney Chuck Michel, who has been working with the Bullwinkle family on the case, said, "If they're going to try to characterize this shirt as depicting violence, then this policy is overboard.  School officials can't write themselves a policy that gives them unfettered discretion."

The Orange Unified School District apparently agrees, as they have subsequently released a statement saying that Principal Fricker has now concluded that the shirt didn't promote violence, and that Haley "will be permitted to wear the shirt."  (Please see our related story here.)

The article also noted that this was not the first time Bullwinkle has worn the shirt to school.  Michel said he's not sure why the shirt caught school administrator's attention this time, but believes it may be connected to the national debate on gun rights.

In the second case, 12-year-old Joseph Lyssikatos of Coventry, Rhode Island, was suspended from Shawn Feinstein Middle School for three days, and forced to miss testing for his advanced math class, after violating the school's "anti-weapons policy."   According to a New York Daily News article, his "weapon" was a toy key chain--slightly larger than a quarter--that was shaped like a gun.  The seventh grader had won the key chain at an arcade.  Unfortunately for him, the dangerous "weapon" fell out of his back pack and was picked up by a classmate who showed it to others.    

Joseph was also banned from a school trip at the end of the month.  The classmate who displayed the key chain after it fell out of Joseph's backpack received no disciplinary action.

As reported in the Daily Caller, our third case involves a Cobb County, Georgia high school senior who faces felony weapons charges for bringing fishing gear to school.  Not in school; to school.  More specifically, in a tackle box, in his car, in the parking lot.

Cody Chitwood, an avid fisherman and 17-year-old student at Lassiter High School, was charged with the felony of bringing weapons into a school zone after police found fishing knives in a tackle box in his car.  Police found the fishing knives while performing a random sweep of cars in the parking lot.

According to the article, if the district attorney decides to prosecute, Chitwood could face 2-10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

"It's pretty ridiculous," said Chitwood.  "I have an attorney and I'm hoping to get the felony dropped so I can still get in the Air Force."

Our final case (for now) involves an 8-year-old Florida boy who was suspended from school for using his finger as a pretend gun while playing with his friends. 

According to a Fox News article, Jordan Bennett was suspended for a day after administrators at Harmony Community School said the hand gesture was an act of violence.

The article reports that Jordan's mother is concerned that the suspension and disciplinary record may cause her son to be unfairly labeled as violent.

"He had nothing in his hand.  It was a finger gun, a pretend gun," Bonnie Bennett said. "He didn't threaten violence.  He didn't utter words that were inappropriate.  He made a sound and used his fingers and that was it."

Reportedly, school district officials said their code of conduct prohibits students from playing with "invisible" guns.   

These four cases--and there will be more--serve as the latest reminder of the pitfalls encountered when "zero-tolerance" rules are applied without exercising sound judgment or basic common sense.  As we note time after time, all of us agree that we want our children to be safe at school, and that reasonable safety measures should be followed.  But this continued unreasonable, zero-common-sense enforcement of "zero tolerance" policies not only encroaches on our freedom, but places an extreme and unfair burden on innocent children and their families.  It also undermines the authority of school personnel by making them appear arbitrary and persecutory.  It is truly outrageous, and needs to stop.

TRENDING NOW
U.K. Moves to Legally De-suppress Suppressors

News  

Monday, July 14, 2025

U.K. Moves to Legally De-suppress Suppressors

On July 4th, President Donald Trump signed into law his “One Big Beautiful Bill,” which included a provision that eliminated the tax stamp fee of $200, but did not deregulate suppressors under the National Firearms ...

Baltimore Gets Serious on Crime Control, and the Results Speak for Themselves

News  

Monday, July 14, 2025

Baltimore Gets Serious on Crime Control, and the Results Speak for Themselves

As the mid-year mark of 2025 hits, a promising report on crime trends has come out of the City of Baltimore. Surprising news at first glance until you dig deeper into the policy direction the ...

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

News  

Second Amendment  

Thursday, May 22, 2025

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

Earlier today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R.1 the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which included Section 2 of the Hearing Protection Act, completely removing suppressors from the National Firearms Act (NFA).

House Annual Appropriations Process Update

News  

Monday, July 14, 2025

House Annual Appropriations Process Update

As the House Appropriations Committee is putting together legislation to fund the government, NRA-ILA has worked closely with policy makers to ensure several long-standing priorities for gun owners were included in the underlying bills.

Legacy Media Finally Acknowledges Politization of Public Health

News  

Monday, July 14, 2025

Legacy Media Finally Acknowledges Politization of Public Health

It appears the editors of The Atlantic are finally willing to entertain an idea that has long been obvious to gun rights supporters.

President Trump Supports Hunting and Resource Protection with Executive Actions

News  

Monday, July 14, 2025

President Trump Supports Hunting and Resource Protection with Executive Actions

Just as the United States was preparing to celebrate 249 beautiful years, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order on July 3rd establishing the “Make America Beautiful Again" Commission supporting hunters, outdoorsmen, and outdoor recreationists by prioritizing the ...

NRA and 2A Allies Announce NFA Lawsuit

Monday, July 7, 2025

NRA and 2A Allies Announce NFA Lawsuit

Following the passage of the “One Big Beautiful Bill”—which eliminates the National Firearms Act of 1934’s (NFA) excise tax on suppressors, short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and AOWs—the National Rifle Association issued a joint statement along with the ...

NRA-ILA July 2025 Litigation Update

Thursday, July 10, 2025

NRA-ILA July 2025 Litigation Update

In the second quarter of 2025, the National Rifle Association filed two cert petitions in the U.S. Supreme Court and five amicus briefs, while continuing to litigate dozens of ongoing lawsuits across the country.

DOJ Declines to Seek Supreme Court Review of Decision Striking Down Federal Laws Prohibiting FFLs From Selling Handguns to 18-to-20-Year-Olds

Thursday, July 10, 2025

DOJ Declines to Seek Supreme Court Review of Decision Striking Down Federal Laws Prohibiting FFLs From Selling Handguns to 18-to-20-Year-Olds

In Reese v. ATF, the Fifth Circuit held that 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(b)(1) and (c)(1)—which together forbid Federal Firearms Licensees from selling handguns to 18-to-20-year-olds—violate the Second Amendment.

Florida: Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday Signed by Governor

Monday, July 7, 2025

Florida: Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday Signed by Governor

Governor Ron DeSantis recently signed the Florida Budget for Fiscal Year 2025–2026, which includes a Second Amendment sales tax holiday from September 8 through December 31, 2025. The NRA is thankful for Governor DeSantis’ strong ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.